健康书面信息可读性高低对自我效能的影响:加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Health Psychology Open Pub Date : 2020-02-12 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2055102920905627
Tsuyoshi Okuhara, Hirono Ishikawa, Haruka Ueno, Hiroko Okada, Mio Kato, Takahiro Kiuchi
{"title":"健康书面信息可读性高低对自我效能的影响:加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。","authors":"Tsuyoshi Okuhara,&nbsp;Hirono Ishikawa,&nbsp;Haruka Ueno,&nbsp;Hiroko Okada,&nbsp;Mio Kato,&nbsp;Takahiro Kiuchi","doi":"10.1177/2055102920905627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the relationship of processing fluency of written information about exercise to participants' perceived interest, safety, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and behavioral intention regarding the exercise. We randomly assigned 400 men and women aged 40-69 years to control or intervention conditions. Perceived self-efficacy of performing the exercise in the intervention group (i.e. easy to read) was significantly higher than that in the control group (i.e. difficult to read) (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Easy-to-read written health information may be important not only for making written health information comprehensible but also for increasing readers' self-efficacy for adopting health-related behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":55856,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"2055102920905627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2055102920905627","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.\",\"authors\":\"Tsuyoshi Okuhara,&nbsp;Hirono Ishikawa,&nbsp;Haruka Ueno,&nbsp;Hiroko Okada,&nbsp;Mio Kato,&nbsp;Takahiro Kiuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2055102920905627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the relationship of processing fluency of written information about exercise to participants' perceived interest, safety, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and behavioral intention regarding the exercise. We randomly assigned 400 men and women aged 40-69 years to control or intervention conditions. Perceived self-efficacy of performing the exercise in the intervention group (i.e. easy to read) was significantly higher than that in the control group (i.e. difficult to read) (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Easy-to-read written health information may be important not only for making written health information comprehensible but also for increasing readers' self-efficacy for adopting health-related behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Open\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"2055102920905627\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2055102920905627\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920905627\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920905627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们调查了运动书面信息的处理流畅性与参与者对运动的感知兴趣、安全、自我效能、结果期望和行为意图之间的关系。我们随机分配400名年龄在40-69岁之间的男性和女性作为对照或干预组。干预组的运动自我效能感(即易读)显著高于对照组(即难读)(p = 0.04)。易于阅读的书面健康信息不仅对使书面健康信息易于理解,而且对提高读者采取健康相关行为的自我效能感也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.

Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.

Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.

Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.

We investigated the relationship of processing fluency of written information about exercise to participants' perceived interest, safety, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and behavioral intention regarding the exercise. We randomly assigned 400 men and women aged 40-69 years to control or intervention conditions. Perceived self-efficacy of performing the exercise in the intervention group (i.e. easy to read) was significantly higher than that in the control group (i.e. difficult to read) (p = 0.04). Easy-to-read written health information may be important not only for making written health information comprehensible but also for increasing readers' self-efficacy for adopting health-related behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Open
Health Psychology Open Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology Open (HPO) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal providing rapid publication. HPO is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge research in health psychology from around the world. HPO seeks to provide a platform for both traditional empirical analyses and more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches to health psychology. All areas of health psychology are covered, but these topics are of particular interest: Clinical health psychology Critical health psychology Community health psychology Health psychology practice Health psychology through a social, cultural or regional lens The journal particularly favours papers that focus on health psychology in practice, including submissions concerning community and/or clinical applications and interventions. Review articles are also welcomed. There is no fixed limit to the length of manuscripts, which is normally strictly limited in other journals, for example HPO’s sister journal, Journal of Health Psychology (JHP). Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信