线型和底型对育成期白罗马鹅生长性能和羽毛特性的影响。

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences Pub Date : 2020-09-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-22 DOI:10.5713/ajas.19.0663
Min Jung Lin, Shen Chang Chang, Tzu Jou Chen, Wei Chih Lin, Shao Yu Peng, Tzu Tai Lee
{"title":"线型和底型对育成期白罗马鹅生长性能和羽毛特性的影响。","authors":"Min Jung Lin,&nbsp;Shen Chang Chang,&nbsp;Tzu Jou Chen,&nbsp;Wei Chih Lin,&nbsp;Shao Yu Peng,&nbsp;Tzu Tai Lee","doi":"10.5713/ajas.19.0663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether goose growth and feather characteristics are influenced by their line and feeding surroundings, inclusive of floor materials and types, since there are no reports regarding these factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 240 White Roman geese which were hatched and sex identified came from 3 commercial goose farms. They were randomly distributed to 24 pens depending on a completely random design. The study continued for 13 weeks and included 3 lines of commercial geese and 2 floor types (cement strip floor [CSF] or cement floor [CF]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The day one gosling weight from A farm was lower than other two farms (96 g vs 107 and 115 g; p<0.001). Afterwards, the body weight, back length, keel length, chest girth and main wing feather length among 3 farms showed no significance difference prior to 12 weeks. The CF group showed heavier body weight, shorter back length, longer keel length, shorter chest girth and shorter main wing feather length than the CSF group prior to 12 weeks. The down weight in the CF was heavier than the CSF group (57.1 g vs 41.8 g; p<0.01) prior to 13 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The body weight showed the positive relations for dry feather weight (r = 0.59), down weight (r = 0.69), percent of the down weight of live body weight prior to 13 weeks (r = 0.61).</p>","PeriodicalId":8558,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","volume":"33 9","pages":"1455-1462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468168/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of line and floor type on growth performance and feather characterization during the growth period of White Roman geese.\",\"authors\":\"Min Jung Lin,&nbsp;Shen Chang Chang,&nbsp;Tzu Jou Chen,&nbsp;Wei Chih Lin,&nbsp;Shao Yu Peng,&nbsp;Tzu Tai Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5713/ajas.19.0663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate whether goose growth and feather characteristics are influenced by their line and feeding surroundings, inclusive of floor materials and types, since there are no reports regarding these factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 240 White Roman geese which were hatched and sex identified came from 3 commercial goose farms. They were randomly distributed to 24 pens depending on a completely random design. The study continued for 13 weeks and included 3 lines of commercial geese and 2 floor types (cement strip floor [CSF] or cement floor [CF]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The day one gosling weight from A farm was lower than other two farms (96 g vs 107 and 115 g; p<0.001). Afterwards, the body weight, back length, keel length, chest girth and main wing feather length among 3 farms showed no significance difference prior to 12 weeks. The CF group showed heavier body weight, shorter back length, longer keel length, shorter chest girth and shorter main wing feather length than the CSF group prior to 12 weeks. The down weight in the CF was heavier than the CSF group (57.1 g vs 41.8 g; p<0.01) prior to 13 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The body weight showed the positive relations for dry feather weight (r = 0.59), down weight (r = 0.69), percent of the down weight of live body weight prior to 13 weeks (r = 0.61).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"1455-1462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468168/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0663\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/10/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是调查鹅的生长和羽毛特征是否受到其线和饲养环境的影响,包括地板材料和类型,因为没有关于这些因素的报道。方法:选取3个商业鹅场孵出并鉴定性别的240只白罗马鹅。根据完全随机的设计,他们被随机分配到24个笔中。试验持续13周,选取3个商品鹅品系和2种地板类型(水泥条地板[CSF]或水泥地板[CF])。结果:A场日龄雏鹅体重(96 g)低于其他两个场(107和115 g);结论:13周龄前雏鸡的体重与干羽重(r = 0.59)、羽绒重(r = 0.69)、羽绒重占活体重的比例(r = 0.61)呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of line and floor type on growth performance and feather characterization during the growth period of White Roman geese.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether goose growth and feather characteristics are influenced by their line and feeding surroundings, inclusive of floor materials and types, since there are no reports regarding these factors.

Methods: The 240 White Roman geese which were hatched and sex identified came from 3 commercial goose farms. They were randomly distributed to 24 pens depending on a completely random design. The study continued for 13 weeks and included 3 lines of commercial geese and 2 floor types (cement strip floor [CSF] or cement floor [CF]).

Results: The day one gosling weight from A farm was lower than other two farms (96 g vs 107 and 115 g; p<0.001). Afterwards, the body weight, back length, keel length, chest girth and main wing feather length among 3 farms showed no significance difference prior to 12 weeks. The CF group showed heavier body weight, shorter back length, longer keel length, shorter chest girth and shorter main wing feather length than the CSF group prior to 12 weeks. The down weight in the CF was heavier than the CSF group (57.1 g vs 41.8 g; p<0.01) prior to 13 weeks.

Conclusion: The body weight showed the positive relations for dry feather weight (r = 0.59), down weight (r = 0.69), percent of the down weight of live body weight prior to 13 weeks (r = 0.61).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) aims to publish original and cutting-edge research results and reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences. Emphasis will be placed on studies involving farm animals such as cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, pigs, horses, and poultry. Studies for the improvement of human health using animal models may also be publishable. AJAS will encompass all areas of animal production and fundamental aspects of animal sciences: breeding and genetics, reproduction and physiology, nutrition, meat and milk science, biotechnology, behavior, welfare, health, and livestock farming systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信