上颌窦手术开窗入路可替代Caldwell-Luc技术。

Q3 Medicine
Massimiliano Manfredi, Christopher Fabbri, Manlio Gessaroli, Federica Morolli, Marco Stacchini
{"title":"上颌窦手术开窗入路可替代Caldwell-Luc技术。","authors":"Massimiliano Manfredi,&nbsp;Christopher Fabbri,&nbsp;Manlio Gessaroli,&nbsp;Federica Morolli,&nbsp;Marco Stacchini","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04255-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the last few years the surgical treatment of patients with maxillary sinus disease has shifted from more invasive maneuvers to more conservative approaches in order to save intraoral mucosa. Recently, some authors have proposed a modification to the classical Caldwell-Luc's approach (CL) for the removal of dental implants displaced into the maxillary sinus. The modified approach involves a fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus. The bony pedicled windows of maxillary sinus in some selected cases may limit some of the most common complications and it may reduce healing times.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Evaluation of the middle term results of a maxillary fenestrated sinus approach as an alternative technique to CL and review of literature.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>From 2013 to 2017 thirty-one patients were treated with the CL modified technique, most of which for foreign bodies, displacement of endodontic material and implants in the maxillary sinus, large mucoceles and odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. All patients were subjected to clinical, and in some cases radiological, from 6 months to 18 months follow-up. Different combinations of Keywords and MeSH term were used for the bibliographic research in the main search engines (PubMed, Cochrane library, Medline). Inclusion criteria - fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus, postoperative complications, description of the operative case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No complications occurred in the intraoperative period and during the months of follow-up. There has been no recurrence of the starting problem and all treated patients were free from residual maxillary pathology 18 months after surgery. Four works meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The surgical fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus is a valid alternative to the classical Caldwell-Luc techniques that, alone or in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery, allow to treat foreign bodies of maxillary sinus, of mucoceles and other diseases of the maxillary sinus. The proposed technique does not require particular surgical skills, it does not increase the operating time and can also be performed under local anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"68 6","pages":"308-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus like alternative to Caldwell-Luc technique.\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Manfredi,&nbsp;Christopher Fabbri,&nbsp;Manlio Gessaroli,&nbsp;Federica Morolli,&nbsp;Marco Stacchini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04255-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the last few years the surgical treatment of patients with maxillary sinus disease has shifted from more invasive maneuvers to more conservative approaches in order to save intraoral mucosa. Recently, some authors have proposed a modification to the classical Caldwell-Luc's approach (CL) for the removal of dental implants displaced into the maxillary sinus. The modified approach involves a fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus. The bony pedicled windows of maxillary sinus in some selected cases may limit some of the most common complications and it may reduce healing times.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Evaluation of the middle term results of a maxillary fenestrated sinus approach as an alternative technique to CL and review of literature.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>From 2013 to 2017 thirty-one patients were treated with the CL modified technique, most of which for foreign bodies, displacement of endodontic material and implants in the maxillary sinus, large mucoceles and odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. All patients were subjected to clinical, and in some cases radiological, from 6 months to 18 months follow-up. Different combinations of Keywords and MeSH term were used for the bibliographic research in the main search engines (PubMed, Cochrane library, Medline). Inclusion criteria - fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus, postoperative complications, description of the operative case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No complications occurred in the intraoperative period and during the months of follow-up. There has been no recurrence of the starting problem and all treated patients were free from residual maxillary pathology 18 months after surgery. Four works meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The surgical fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus is a valid alternative to the classical Caldwell-Luc techniques that, alone or in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery, allow to treat foreign bodies of maxillary sinus, of mucoceles and other diseases of the maxillary sinus. The proposed technique does not require particular surgical skills, it does not increase the operating time and can also be performed under local anesthesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"volume\":\"68 6\",\"pages\":\"308-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04255-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04255-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的几年里,上颌窦疾病患者的手术治疗已经从更多的侵入性操作转向更保守的方法,以保存口腔内粘膜。最近,一些作者提出了一种改进经典的Caldwell-Luc入路(CL),用于去除移位到上颌窦的种植体。改良入路包括上颌窦开窗入路。上颌窦骨带蒂窗在某些病例中可以限制一些最常见的并发症,并可以缩短愈合时间。证据获取:上颌开窗窦入路作为CL的替代技术的中期结果评价和文献回顾。证据综合:2013年至2017年,采用CL改良技术治疗31例患者,主要针对上颌窦异物、根管材料移位、种植体移位、大黏液囊肿和牙源性上颌鼻炎。所有患者均接受临床随访,部分患者接受放射学随访,随访时间为6至18个月。主要搜索引擎(PubMed, Cochrane library, Medline)的书目研究使用了不同的关键词和MeSH术语组合。纳入标准-上颌窦开窗入路,术后并发症,手术病例描述。结论:术中及随访数月无并发症发生。手术后18个月,所有患者均无上颌残留病理。有四件作品符合入选标准。上颌窦手术开窗入路是经典Caldwell-Luc技术的有效替代方法,后者单独或与内窥镜鼻窦手术相结合,可以治疗上颌窦异物、粘液囊肿和其他上颌窦疾病。该技术不需要特殊的手术技巧,不增加手术时间,也可以在局部麻醉下进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus like alternative to Caldwell-Luc technique.

Introduction: In the last few years the surgical treatment of patients with maxillary sinus disease has shifted from more invasive maneuvers to more conservative approaches in order to save intraoral mucosa. Recently, some authors have proposed a modification to the classical Caldwell-Luc's approach (CL) for the removal of dental implants displaced into the maxillary sinus. The modified approach involves a fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus. The bony pedicled windows of maxillary sinus in some selected cases may limit some of the most common complications and it may reduce healing times.

Evidence acquisition: Evaluation of the middle term results of a maxillary fenestrated sinus approach as an alternative technique to CL and review of literature.

Evidence synthesis: From 2013 to 2017 thirty-one patients were treated with the CL modified technique, most of which for foreign bodies, displacement of endodontic material and implants in the maxillary sinus, large mucoceles and odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. All patients were subjected to clinical, and in some cases radiological, from 6 months to 18 months follow-up. Different combinations of Keywords and MeSH term were used for the bibliographic research in the main search engines (PubMed, Cochrane library, Medline). Inclusion criteria - fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus, postoperative complications, description of the operative case.

Conclusions: No complications occurred in the intraoperative period and during the months of follow-up. There has been no recurrence of the starting problem and all treated patients were free from residual maxillary pathology 18 months after surgery. Four works meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The surgical fenestrated approach to the maxillary sinus is a valid alternative to the classical Caldwell-Luc techniques that, alone or in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery, allow to treat foreign bodies of maxillary sinus, of mucoceles and other diseases of the maxillary sinus. The proposed technique does not require particular surgical skills, it does not increase the operating time and can also be performed under local anesthesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva stomatologica
Minerva stomatologica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信