释义、历史和未来。

IF 17.8 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-07 Epub Date: 2020-02-05 DOI:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548

Charles Moser, Peggy J Kleinplatz

{"title":"释义、历史和未来。","authors":"Charles Moser, Peggy J Kleinplatz","doi":"10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no accepted definition of the term paraphilia despite its being listed as an essential feature of a class of mental disorders known as the paraphilic disorders. The origin of the term, history of its inclusion as a diagnosis, and logical flaws inherent in the various definitions are discussed in this review. We examine the basis for pathologizing individuals with paraphilias, consider what paraphilias can tell us about how humans develop their sexual interests, and question the usefulness of dividing sexual interests into paraphilias and normophilias. The construct of the paraphilias appears to be poorly conceived and has outlived its usefulness.","PeriodicalId":50755,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualization, History, and Future of the Paraphilias.\",\"authors\":\"Charles Moser, Peggy J Kleinplatz\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is no accepted definition of the term paraphilia despite its being listed as an essential feature of a class of mental disorders known as the paraphilic disorders. The origin of the term, history of its inclusion as a diagnosis, and logical flaws inherent in the various definitions are discussed in this review. We examine the basis for pathologizing individuals with paraphilias, consider what paraphilias can tell us about how humans develop their sexual interests, and question the usefulness of dividing sexual interests into paraphilias and normophilias. The construct of the paraphilias appears to be poorly conceived and has outlived its usefulness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

摘要

尽管它被列为一种被称为性反常障碍的精神障碍的基本特征，但对“性反常”一词还没有公认的定义。本综述讨论了该术语的起源，其作为诊断的历史，以及各种定义中固有的逻辑缺陷。我们研究了有性反常行为的个体的病理基础，考虑了性反常行为可以告诉我们人类是如何发展他们的性兴趣的，并质疑将性兴趣分为性反常行为和正常恋的有效性。性偏离的构造似乎构思得很差，而且已经失去了它的用处。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conceptualization, History, and Future of the Paraphilias.

There is no accepted definition of the term paraphilia despite its being listed as an essential feature of a class of mental disorders known as the paraphilic disorders. The origin of the term, history of its inclusion as a diagnosis, and logical flaws inherent in the various definitions are discussed in this review. We examine the basis for pathologizing individuals with paraphilias, consider what paraphilias can tell us about how humans develop their sexual interests, and question the usefulness of dividing sexual interests into paraphilias and normophilias. The construct of the paraphilias appears to be poorly conceived and has outlived its usefulness.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 医学-心理学

CiteScore

31.50

自引率

0.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Annual Review of Clinical Psychology is a publication that has been available since 2005. It offers comprehensive reviews on significant developments in the field of clinical psychology and psychiatry. The journal covers various aspects including research, theory, and the application of psychological principles to address recognized disorders such as schizophrenia, mood, anxiety, childhood, substance use, cognitive, and personality disorders. Additionally, the articles also touch upon broader issues that cut across the field, such as diagnosis, treatment, social policy, and cross-cultural and legal issues. Recently, the current volume of this journal has transitioned from a gated access model to an open access format through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. All articles published in this volume are now available under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), allowing for widespread distribution and use. The journal is also abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search, among others.