健康研究中的公民科学模式:澳大利亚的评论。

Online journal of public health informatics Pub Date : 2019-12-31 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5210/ojphi.v11i3.10358
Ann Borda, Kathleen Gray, Laura Downie
{"title":"健康研究中的公民科学模式:澳大利亚的评论。","authors":"Ann Borda, Kathleen Gray, Laura Downie","doi":"10.5210/ojphi.v11i3.10358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative review explores how established citizen science models can inform and support meaningful engagement of public in health research in Australia. In particular, with the growth in participatory health research approaches and increasing consumer participation in contributing to this research through digital technologies, there are gaps in our understanding of best practice in health and biomedical citizen science research to address these paradigm shifts. Notable gaps are how we might more clearly define the parameters of such research and which citizen science models might best support digitally-enabled participation falling within these. Further work in this area is expected to lead to how established citizen science methods may help improve the quality of and the translation of public engagement in health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"11 3","pages":"e23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975539/pdf/ojphi-11-e23.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizen Science Models in Health Research: an Australian Commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Borda, Kathleen Gray, Laura Downie\",\"doi\":\"10.5210/ojphi.v11i3.10358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This qualitative review explores how established citizen science models can inform and support meaningful engagement of public in health research in Australia. In particular, with the growth in participatory health research approaches and increasing consumer participation in contributing to this research through digital technologies, there are gaps in our understanding of best practice in health and biomedical citizen science research to address these paradigm shifts. Notable gaps are how we might more clearly define the parameters of such research and which citizen science models might best support digitally-enabled participation falling within these. Further work in this area is expected to lead to how established citizen science methods may help improve the quality of and the translation of public engagement in health research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"e23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6975539/pdf/ojphi-11-e23.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online journal of public health informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v11i3.10358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v11i3.10358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定性综述探讨了既有的公民科学模式如何为澳大利亚公众有意义地参与健康研究提供信息和支持。特别是,随着参与式健康研究方法的发展,以及越来越多的消费者通过数字技术参与到这项研究中来,我们对健康和生物医学公民科学研究最佳实践的理解还存在差距,无法应对这些模式的转变。值得注意的差距是,我们如何才能更清晰地定义此类研究的参数,以及哪些公民科学模式可以最好地支持这些参数范围内的数字化参与。预计这一领域的进一步工作将有助于了解既定的公民科学方法可如何帮助提高公众参与健康研究的质量并将其转化为成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Citizen Science Models in Health Research: an Australian Commentary.

This qualitative review explores how established citizen science models can inform and support meaningful engagement of public in health research in Australia. In particular, with the growth in participatory health research approaches and increasing consumer participation in contributing to this research through digital technologies, there are gaps in our understanding of best practice in health and biomedical citizen science research to address these paradigm shifts. Notable gaps are how we might more clearly define the parameters of such research and which citizen science models might best support digitally-enabled participation falling within these. Further work in this area is expected to lead to how established citizen science methods may help improve the quality of and the translation of public engagement in health research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信