一个不相关随机反应技术与逻辑回归分析的替代方案。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2016-11-01 Epub Date: 2016-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1
Shu-Hui Hsieh, Shen-Ming Lee, Chin-Shang Li, Su-Hao Tu
{"title":"一个不相关随机反应技术与逻辑回归分析的替代方案。","authors":"Shu-Hui Hsieh,&nbsp;Shen-Ming Lee,&nbsp;Chin-Shang Li,&nbsp;Su-Hao Tu","doi":"10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The randomized response technique (RRT) is an important tool that is commonly used to protect a respondent's privacy and avoid biased answers in surveys on sensitive issues. In this work, we consider the joint use of the unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 64:520-539, 1969) and the related-question RRT of Warner (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63-69, 1965) dealing with the issue of an innocuous question from the unrelated-question RRT. Unlike the existing unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (1969), the approach can provide more information on the innocuous question by using the related-question RRT of Warner (1965) to effectively improve the efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator of Scheers and Dayton (J Am Stat Assoc 83:969-974, 1988). We can then estimate the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic by using logistic regression. In this new design, we propose the transformation method and provide large-sample properties. From the case of two survey studies, an extramarital relationship study and a cable TV study, we develop the joint conditional likelihood method. As part of this research, we conduct a simulation study of the relative efficiencies of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we use the two survey studies to compare the analysis results under different scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hui Hsieh,&nbsp;Shen-Ming Lee,&nbsp;Chin-Shang Li,&nbsp;Su-Hao Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The randomized response technique (RRT) is an important tool that is commonly used to protect a respondent's privacy and avoid biased answers in surveys on sensitive issues. In this work, we consider the joint use of the unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 64:520-539, 1969) and the related-question RRT of Warner (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63-69, 1965) dealing with the issue of an innocuous question from the unrelated-question RRT. Unlike the existing unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (1969), the approach can provide more information on the innocuous question by using the related-question RRT of Warner (1965) to effectively improve the efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator of Scheers and Dayton (J Am Stat Assoc 83:969-974, 1988). We can then estimate the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic by using logistic regression. In this new design, we propose the transformation method and provide large-sample properties. From the case of two survey studies, an extramarital relationship study and a cable TV study, we develop the joint conditional likelihood method. As part of this research, we conduct a simulation study of the relative efficiencies of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we use the two survey studies to compare the analysis results under different scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随机反应技术(RRT)是一种重要的工具,通常用于保护受访者的隐私,避免在敏感问题的调查中有偏见的答案。在这项工作中,我们考虑联合使用格林伯格等人的非相关问题RRT (J Am Stat Assoc 64:520- 539,1969)和华纳的相关问题RRT (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63- 69,1965)来处理非相关问题RRT中无害问题的问题。与Greenberg等人(1969)现有的无相关问题RRT不同,该方法可以通过使用Warner(1965)的相关问题RRT提供更多关于无害问题的信息,从而有效提高Scheers和Dayton (J Am Stat Assoc 83:969-974, 1988)的最大似然估计器的效率。然后,我们可以使用逻辑回归来估计敏感特征的普遍性。在这种新设计中,我们提出了转换方法并提供了大样本特性。本文以婚外关系调查和有线电视调查为例,提出了联合条件似然方法。作为本研究的一部分,我们对所提出的方法的相对效率进行了模拟研究。此外,我们利用两项调查研究比较了不同情景下的分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.

An alternative to unrelated randomized response techniques with logistic regression analysis.

The randomized response technique (RRT) is an important tool that is commonly used to protect a respondent's privacy and avoid biased answers in surveys on sensitive issues. In this work, we consider the joint use of the unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 64:520-539, 1969) and the related-question RRT of Warner (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63-69, 1965) dealing with the issue of an innocuous question from the unrelated-question RRT. Unlike the existing unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (1969), the approach can provide more information on the innocuous question by using the related-question RRT of Warner (1965) to effectively improve the efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator of Scheers and Dayton (J Am Stat Assoc 83:969-974, 1988). We can then estimate the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic by using logistic regression. In this new design, we propose the transformation method and provide large-sample properties. From the case of two survey studies, an extramarital relationship study and a cable TV study, we develop the joint conditional likelihood method. As part of this research, we conduct a simulation study of the relative efficiencies of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we use the two survey studies to compare the analysis results under different scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信