医生、医学和护理专业学生对共同决策的看法:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2019-07-04 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487
Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert, Ann Van Hecke, Kim Smolderen
{"title":"医生、医学和护理专业学生对共同决策的看法:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert,&nbsp;Ann Van Hecke,&nbsp;Kim Smolderen","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of Flemish physicians and medical/nursing trainees regarding shared decision-making (SDM) and to determine possible differences based on sex, age, rank, occupation and specialty. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2017 in which the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) was translated and administered. Higher scores on the six-point scale indicate a patient-centered respondent. Independent t-tests, One and Two-way ANOVA and multivariate regression analysis with the variables sex, age, occupation and specialty were performed. <b>Results</b>: 266 responses from 93 physicians, 147 medical and 26 nursing students were analyzed. Mean sharing scores were 4,24 ± 0,64; 4,30 ± 0,61; and 4,30 ± 0,67, respectively. In the regression model, female sex (p < 0,10) and employment (p < 0,05) in general practice or internal medicine is predictive for higher sharing among physicians. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between specialisms (p < 0,05): pediatricians (4,79 ± 0,69), psychiatrists (4,74 ± 0,47), obstetricians/gynecologists (4,40 ± 0,38) and general practitioners (4,31 ± 0,59) scored higher on the PPOS than surgeons (3,84 ± 0,58). <b>Conclusion</b>: Flemish providers and trainees are disease-centered. Physicians' attitudes vary depending on their specialism, presumably due to prolonged exposure to the specific clinical context. Additionally, academic-trained nurses share the belief that the physician should decide and the patient should rely on his knowledge rather than his own. There is an urgent need for health policy and educational institutions to facilitate an environment in which SDM is supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":"76 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of physicians, medical and nursing students concerning shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert,&nbsp;Ann Van Hecke,&nbsp;Kim Smolderen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of Flemish physicians and medical/nursing trainees regarding shared decision-making (SDM) and to determine possible differences based on sex, age, rank, occupation and specialty. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2017 in which the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) was translated and administered. Higher scores on the six-point scale indicate a patient-centered respondent. Independent t-tests, One and Two-way ANOVA and multivariate regression analysis with the variables sex, age, occupation and specialty were performed. <b>Results</b>: 266 responses from 93 physicians, 147 medical and 26 nursing students were analyzed. Mean sharing scores were 4,24 ± 0,64; 4,30 ± 0,61; and 4,30 ± 0,67, respectively. In the regression model, female sex (p < 0,10) and employment (p < 0,05) in general practice or internal medicine is predictive for higher sharing among physicians. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between specialisms (p < 0,05): pediatricians (4,79 ± 0,69), psychiatrists (4,74 ± 0,47), obstetricians/gynecologists (4,40 ± 0,38) and general practitioners (4,31 ± 0,59) scored higher on the PPOS than surgeons (3,84 ± 0,58). <b>Conclusion</b>: Flemish providers and trainees are disease-centered. Physicians' attitudes vary depending on their specialism, presumably due to prolonged exposure to the specific clinical context. Additionally, academic-trained nurses share the belief that the physician should decide and the patient should rely on his knowledge rather than his own. There is an urgent need for health policy and educational institutions to facilitate an environment in which SDM is supported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2019.1637487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估佛兰德医生和医疗/护理培训生对共同决策(SDM)的态度,并确定基于性别、年龄、职级、职业和专业的可能差异。方法:在2017年6月至9月期间进行了一项横断面研究,其中翻译并实施了患者-医生取向量表(PPOS)。在6分制中得分越高表明受访者以患者为中心。以性别、年龄、职业、专业为变量进行独立t检验、单因素和双向方差分析及多元回归分析。结果:对93名内科医生、147名医科学生和26名护生的266份问卷进行分析。平均分享得分为4.24±0.64分;4,30±0,61;分别为4,30±0,67。在回归模型中,女性性别(p < 0,10)和全科或内科职业(p < 0.05)对医生之间较高的共享具有预测作用。双变量分析显示各专科之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05):儿科医生(4,79±0,69)、精神科医生(4,74±0,47)、妇产科医生(4,40±0,38)和全科医生(4,31±0,59)的PPOS得分高于外科医生(3,84±0,58)。结论:佛兰德医生和学员以疾病为中心。医生的态度取决于他们的专业,可能是由于长期接触特定的临床环境。此外,受过学术训练的护士都相信医生应该决定,病人应该依靠他的知识而不是他自己的知识。卫生政策和教育机构迫切需要创造一种支持可持续发展的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of physicians, medical and nursing students concerning shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of Flemish physicians and medical/nursing trainees regarding shared decision-making (SDM) and to determine possible differences based on sex, age, rank, occupation and specialty. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and September 2017 in which the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) was translated and administered. Higher scores on the six-point scale indicate a patient-centered respondent. Independent t-tests, One and Two-way ANOVA and multivariate regression analysis with the variables sex, age, occupation and specialty were performed. Results: 266 responses from 93 physicians, 147 medical and 26 nursing students were analyzed. Mean sharing scores were 4,24 ± 0,64; 4,30 ± 0,61; and 4,30 ± 0,67, respectively. In the regression model, female sex (p < 0,10) and employment (p < 0,05) in general practice or internal medicine is predictive for higher sharing among physicians. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between specialisms (p < 0,05): pediatricians (4,79 ± 0,69), psychiatrists (4,74 ± 0,47), obstetricians/gynecologists (4,40 ± 0,38) and general practitioners (4,31 ± 0,59) scored higher on the PPOS than surgeons (3,84 ± 0,58). Conclusion: Flemish providers and trainees are disease-centered. Physicians' attitudes vary depending on their specialism, presumably due to prolonged exposure to the specific clinical context. Additionally, academic-trained nurses share the belief that the physician should decide and the patient should rely on his knowledge rather than his own. There is an urgent need for health policy and educational institutions to facilitate an environment in which SDM is supported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信