使用Rasch测量法的学校领导跨文化比较。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2019-01-01
Sijia Zhang, Stefanie A Wind
{"title":"使用Rasch测量法的学校领导跨文化比较。","authors":"Sijia Zhang,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School leadership influences school conditions and organizational climate; these conditions in turn impact student outcomes. Accordingly, examining differences in principals' perceptions of leadership activities within and across countries may provide insight into achievement differences. The major purpose of this study was to explore differences in the relative difficulty of principals' leadership activities across four countries that reflect Asian and North American national contexts: (1) Hong Kong SAR, (2) Chinese Taipei, (3) the United States, and (4) Canada. We also sought to illustrate the use of Rasch measurement theory as a modern measurement approach to exploring the psychometric properties of a leadership survey, with a focus on differential item functioning. We applied a rating scale formulation of the Many-facet Rasch model to principals' responses to the Leadership Activities Scale in order to examine the degree to which the overall ordering of leadership activities was invariant across the four countries. Overall, the results suggested that there were significant differences in the difficulty ordering of leadership activities across countries, and that these differences were most pronounced between the two continents. Implications are discussed for research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"20 2","pages":"167-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Comparisons of School Leadership using Rasch Measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Zhang,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>School leadership influences school conditions and organizational climate; these conditions in turn impact student outcomes. Accordingly, examining differences in principals' perceptions of leadership activities within and across countries may provide insight into achievement differences. The major purpose of this study was to explore differences in the relative difficulty of principals' leadership activities across four countries that reflect Asian and North American national contexts: (1) Hong Kong SAR, (2) Chinese Taipei, (3) the United States, and (4) Canada. We also sought to illustrate the use of Rasch measurement theory as a modern measurement approach to exploring the psychometric properties of a leadership survey, with a focus on differential item functioning. We applied a rating scale formulation of the Many-facet Rasch model to principals' responses to the Leadership Activities Scale in order to examine the degree to which the overall ordering of leadership activities was invariant across the four countries. Overall, the results suggested that there were significant differences in the difficulty ordering of leadership activities across countries, and that these differences were most pronounced between the two continents. Implications are discussed for research and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"167-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学校领导影响学校条件和组织氛围;这些条件反过来又影响学生的学习成绩。因此,研究校长在国家内部和国家之间对领导活动的看法差异,可以深入了解成就差异。本研究的主要目的是探讨四个反映亚洲和北美国家背景的校长领导活动相对难度的差异:(1)香港特别行政区,(2)中国台北,(3)美国和(4)加拿大。我们还试图说明使用Rasch测量理论作为一种现代测量方法来探索领导力调查的心理测量特性,重点是差异项目功能。我们将多面拉赫模型的评分量表公式应用于校长对领导活动量表的反应,以检查四个国家领导活动的总体顺序不变的程度。总体而言,研究结果表明,不同国家的领导活动排序难度存在显著差异,而这些差异在两大洲之间最为明显。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural Comparisons of School Leadership using Rasch Measurement.

School leadership influences school conditions and organizational climate; these conditions in turn impact student outcomes. Accordingly, examining differences in principals' perceptions of leadership activities within and across countries may provide insight into achievement differences. The major purpose of this study was to explore differences in the relative difficulty of principals' leadership activities across four countries that reflect Asian and North American national contexts: (1) Hong Kong SAR, (2) Chinese Taipei, (3) the United States, and (4) Canada. We also sought to illustrate the use of Rasch measurement theory as a modern measurement approach to exploring the psychometric properties of a leadership survey, with a focus on differential item functioning. We applied a rating scale formulation of the Many-facet Rasch model to principals' responses to the Leadership Activities Scale in order to examine the degree to which the overall ordering of leadership activities was invariant across the four countries. Overall, the results suggested that there were significant differences in the difficulty ordering of leadership activities across countries, and that these differences were most pronounced between the two continents. Implications are discussed for research and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信