反恐战争中的美国军事医学伦理。

Q2 Medicine

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-01-24 DOI:10.1136/jramc-2018-001062

George J Annas, S Crosby

{"title":"反恐战争中的美国军事医学伦理。","authors":"George J Annas, S Crosby","doi":"10.1136/jramc-2018-001062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Military medical ethics has been challenged by the post-11 September 2001 'War on Terror'. Two recurrent questions are whether military physicians are officers first or physicians first, and whether military physicians need a separate code of ethics. In this article, we focus on how the War on Terror has affected the way we have addressed these questions since 2001. Two examples frame this discussion: the use of military physicians to force-feed hunger strikers held in Guantanamo Bay prison camp, and the uncertain fate of the Department of Defense's report on 'Ethical Guidelines and Practices for US Military Medical Professionals'.","PeriodicalId":17327,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jramc-2018-001062","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"US military medical ethics in the War on Terror.\",\"authors\":\"George J Annas, S Crosby\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jramc-2018-001062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Military medical ethics has been challenged by the post-11 September 2001 'War on Terror'. Two recurrent questions are whether military physicians are officers first or physicians first, and whether military physicians need a separate code of ethics. In this article, we focus on how the War on Terror has affected the way we have addressed these questions since 2001. Two examples frame this discussion: the use of military physicians to force-feed hunger strikers held in Guantanamo Bay prison camp, and the uncertain fate of the Department of Defense's report on 'Ethical Guidelines and Practices for US Military Medical Professionals'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jramc-2018-001062\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2018-001062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

2001年9月11日之后的“反恐战争”对军事医学伦理提出了挑战。两个反复出现的问题是，军医首先是军官还是医生，以及军医是否需要单独的道德准则。在这篇文章中，我们将重点讨论自2001年以来反恐战争是如何影响我们解决这些问题的方式的。有两个例子构成了这次讨论的框架:使用军医强迫喂食关押在关塔那摩湾监狱的绝食者，以及国防部关于“美国军事医疗专业人员的道德准则和实践”的报告的不确定命运。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

US military medical ethics in the War on Terror.

Military medical ethics has been challenged by the post-11 September 2001 'War on Terror'. Two recurrent questions are whether military physicians are officers first or physicians first, and whether military physicians need a separate code of ethics. In this article, we focus on how the War on Terror has affected the way we have addressed these questions since 2001. Two examples frame this discussion: the use of military physicians to force-feed hunger strikers held in Guantanamo Bay prison camp, and the uncertain fate of the Department of Defense's report on 'Ethical Guidelines and Practices for US Military Medical Professionals'.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps aims to publish high quality research, reviews and case reports, as well as other invited articles, which pertain to the practice of military medicine in its broadest sense. It welcomes material from all ranks, services and corps wherever they serve as well as submissions from beyond the military. It is intended not only to propagate current knowledge and expertise but also to act as an institutional memory for the practice of medicine within the military.