植周炎的手术治疗。

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Ausra Ramanauskaite, Karina Obreja, Robert Sader, Fouad Khoury, Georgios Romanos, Ki Tae Koo, Philip Leander Keeve, Anton Sculean, Frank Schwarz
{"title":"植周炎的手术治疗。","authors":"Ausra Ramanauskaite,&nbsp;Karina Obreja,&nbsp;Robert Sader,&nbsp;Fouad Khoury,&nbsp;Georgios Romanos,&nbsp;Ki Tae Koo,&nbsp;Philip Leander Keeve,&nbsp;Anton Sculean,&nbsp;Frank Schwarz","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address the focused question: \"In patients with osseointegrated implants diagnosed with periimplantitis, what are the clinical and radiographic outcomes of augmentative surgical interventions compared with nonaugmentative surgical measures\"?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Literature screening was performed in MEDLINE through the PubMed database, for articles published until January 1, 2018. Human studies reporting on the clinical (ie, bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing depth [PD] changes) and/or radiographic (ie, periimplant defect reduction and/or fill) treatment outcomes after surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy, and/or comparing augmentative and nonaugmentative surgical approaches were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen comparative and 11 observational clinical studies were included. Surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy resulted in mean BOP and PD reduction ranging from 26% to 91%, and 0.74 to 5.4 mm, respectively. The reported mean radiographic fill of intrabony defects ranged between 57% and 93.3%, and defect vertical reduction varied from 0.2 to 3.77 mm. Three randomized controlled clinical studies failed to demonstrate the superiority of augmentative therapy compared with nonaugmentative approach in terms of PD and BOP reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence to support superiority of augmentative surgical techniques for periimplantitis management on the treatment outcomes over nonaugmentative methods is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000839","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Treatment of Periimplantitis With Augmentative Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Ausra Ramanauskaite,&nbsp;Karina Obreja,&nbsp;Robert Sader,&nbsp;Fouad Khoury,&nbsp;Georgios Romanos,&nbsp;Ki Tae Koo,&nbsp;Philip Leander Keeve,&nbsp;Anton Sculean,&nbsp;Frank Schwarz\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ID.0000000000000839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To address the focused question: \\\"In patients with osseointegrated implants diagnosed with periimplantitis, what are the clinical and radiographic outcomes of augmentative surgical interventions compared with nonaugmentative surgical measures\\\"?</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Literature screening was performed in MEDLINE through the PubMed database, for articles published until January 1, 2018. Human studies reporting on the clinical (ie, bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing depth [PD] changes) and/or radiographic (ie, periimplant defect reduction and/or fill) treatment outcomes after surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy, and/or comparing augmentative and nonaugmentative surgical approaches were searched.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen comparative and 11 observational clinical studies were included. Surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy resulted in mean BOP and PD reduction ranging from 26% to 91%, and 0.74 to 5.4 mm, respectively. The reported mean radiographic fill of intrabony defects ranged between 57% and 93.3%, and defect vertical reduction varied from 0.2 to 3.77 mm. Three randomized controlled clinical studies failed to demonstrate the superiority of augmentative therapy compared with nonaugmentative approach in terms of PD and BOP reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence to support superiority of augmentative surgical techniques for periimplantitis management on the treatment outcomes over nonaugmentative methods is limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000839\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000839\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:解决焦点问题:“在诊断为种植体周围炎的骨整合种植体患者中,与非增强手术措施相比,增强手术干预的临床和影像学结果是什么?”材料和方法:通过PubMed数据库在MEDLINE中对2018年1月1日之前发表的文章进行文献筛选。我们检索了关于手术增强性种植周炎治疗后临床(即穿刺出血[BOP]和穿刺深度[PD]改变)和/或影像学(即种植周缺损缩小和/或填充)治疗结果的人类研究报告,以及/或比较增强和非增强手术入路。结果:纳入13项比较研究和11项观察性临床研究。手术增强种植周炎治疗导致平均BOP和PD分别减少26%至91%和0.74至5.4 mm。据报道,骨内缺损的x线片平均充足率在57%至93.3%之间,缺损垂直复位从0.2至3.77 mm不等。三个随机对照临床研究未能证明增强治疗在PD和BOP降低方面优于非增强治疗。结论:现有证据表明,在种植体周围炎治疗中,增强手术技术优于非增强手术技术的治疗效果有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Treatment of Periimplantitis With Augmentative Techniques.

Objectives: To address the focused question: "In patients with osseointegrated implants diagnosed with periimplantitis, what are the clinical and radiographic outcomes of augmentative surgical interventions compared with nonaugmentative surgical measures"?

Material and methods: Literature screening was performed in MEDLINE through the PubMed database, for articles published until January 1, 2018. Human studies reporting on the clinical (ie, bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing depth [PD] changes) and/or radiographic (ie, periimplant defect reduction and/or fill) treatment outcomes after surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy, and/or comparing augmentative and nonaugmentative surgical approaches were searched.

Results: Thirteen comparative and 11 observational clinical studies were included. Surgical augmentative periimplantitis therapy resulted in mean BOP and PD reduction ranging from 26% to 91%, and 0.74 to 5.4 mm, respectively. The reported mean radiographic fill of intrabony defects ranged between 57% and 93.3%, and defect vertical reduction varied from 0.2 to 3.77 mm. Three randomized controlled clinical studies failed to demonstrate the superiority of augmentative therapy compared with nonaugmentative approach in terms of PD and BOP reduction.

Conclusions: The available evidence to support superiority of augmentative surgical techniques for periimplantitis management on the treatment outcomes over nonaugmentative methods is limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信