急性冠脉综合征中二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的当代处方模式。

Q1 Medicine
P and T Pub Date : 2018-11-01
Ellen B Yin, Huy Nguyen, Ishan Kamat, Maryam Bayat, Mahboob Alam
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征中二磷酸腺苷受体抑制剂的当代处方模式。","authors":"Ellen B Yin,&nbsp;Huy Nguyen,&nbsp;Ishan Kamat,&nbsp;Maryam Bayat,&nbsp;Mahboob Alam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the contemporary use of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome at a large, quaternary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using health records to compare patients who were treated with ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca), prasugrel, or clopidogrel for a primary diagnosis of new-onset acute coronary syndrome between January 2014 and December 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275 patients were identified. Clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed ADP receptor antagonist (52%), followed by ticagrelor (26%) and prasugrel (22%). Patients who were prescribed clopidogrel were more likely female (<i>P</i> < 0.01), 75 years of age or older (<i>P</i> < 0.01), and 60 kg or less in weight (<i>P</i> = 0.02), and they had more comorbidities. Of the patients on clopidogrel prior to admission, 21% were switched to prasugrel or ticagrelor for inadequate platelet inhibition, restenosis, or new stent placement. Of the patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel prior to admission, 17% were switched to clopidogrel for concerns about bleeding or cost. Clopidogrel was prescribed 13% of the time, prasugrel 13% of the time, and ticagrelor 4% of the time (<i>P</i> = 0.13) outside the recommended use per Food and Drug Administration-approved prescribing information based on relative or absolute contraindications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agent, particularly in older patients with more comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":38773,"journal":{"name":"P and T","volume":"43 11","pages":"667-674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205126/pdf/ptj43011667.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Ellen B Yin,&nbsp;Huy Nguyen,&nbsp;Ishan Kamat,&nbsp;Maryam Bayat,&nbsp;Mahboob Alam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the contemporary use of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome at a large, quaternary academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted using health records to compare patients who were treated with ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca), prasugrel, or clopidogrel for a primary diagnosis of new-onset acute coronary syndrome between January 2014 and December 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 275 patients were identified. Clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed ADP receptor antagonist (52%), followed by ticagrelor (26%) and prasugrel (22%). Patients who were prescribed clopidogrel were more likely female (<i>P</i> < 0.01), 75 years of age or older (<i>P</i> < 0.01), and 60 kg or less in weight (<i>P</i> = 0.02), and they had more comorbidities. Of the patients on clopidogrel prior to admission, 21% were switched to prasugrel or ticagrelor for inadequate platelet inhibition, restenosis, or new stent placement. Of the patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel prior to admission, 17% were switched to clopidogrel for concerns about bleeding or cost. Clopidogrel was prescribed 13% of the time, prasugrel 13% of the time, and ticagrelor 4% of the time (<i>P</i> = 0.13) outside the recommended use per Food and Drug Administration-approved prescribing information based on relative or absolute contraindications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agent, particularly in older patients with more comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"P and T\",\"volume\":\"43 11\",\"pages\":\"667-674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6205126/pdf/ptj43011667.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"P and T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"P and T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估一家大型四级学术医疗中心急性冠状动脉综合征中二磷酸腺苷(ADP)受体抑制剂的使用情况。方法:采用回顾性观察性研究,比较2014年1月至2014年12月期间,因初发急性冠脉综合征而接受替格瑞洛(Brilinta, AstraZeneca)、普拉格雷或氯吡格雷治疗的患者的健康记录。结果:共发现275例患者。氯吡格雷是最常用的ADP受体拮抗剂(52%),其次是替格瑞洛(26%)和普拉格雷(22%)。服用氯吡格雷的患者多为女性(P < 0.01)、75岁及以上(P < 0.01)、体重60kg及以下(P = 0.02),且合并症较多。入院前使用氯吡格雷的患者中,21%因血小板抑制不足、再狭窄或新支架植入而改用普拉格雷或替格瑞洛。入院前使用替格瑞或普拉格雷的患者中,17%因担心出血或费用而改用氯吡格雷。根据美国食品和药物管理局(Food and Drug administration)基于相对或绝对禁忌症批准的处方信息,在推荐使用范围之外,13%的时间使用氯吡格雷,13%的时间使用普拉格雷,4%的时间使用替格瑞洛(P = 0.13)。结论:氯吡格雷仍然是最常用的抗血小板药物,特别是在有更多合并症的老年患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Contemporary Prescription Patterns of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Purpose: To assess the contemporary use of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome at a large, quaternary academic medical center.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using health records to compare patients who were treated with ticagrelor (Brilinta, AstraZeneca), prasugrel, or clopidogrel for a primary diagnosis of new-onset acute coronary syndrome between January 2014 and December 2014.

Results: A total of 275 patients were identified. Clopidogrel was the most commonly prescribed ADP receptor antagonist (52%), followed by ticagrelor (26%) and prasugrel (22%). Patients who were prescribed clopidogrel were more likely female (P < 0.01), 75 years of age or older (P < 0.01), and 60 kg or less in weight (P = 0.02), and they had more comorbidities. Of the patients on clopidogrel prior to admission, 21% were switched to prasugrel or ticagrelor for inadequate platelet inhibition, restenosis, or new stent placement. Of the patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel prior to admission, 17% were switched to clopidogrel for concerns about bleeding or cost. Clopidogrel was prescribed 13% of the time, prasugrel 13% of the time, and ticagrelor 4% of the time (P = 0.13) outside the recommended use per Food and Drug Administration-approved prescribing information based on relative or absolute contraindications.

Conclusion: Clopidogrel continues to be the most commonly prescribed antiplatelet agent, particularly in older patients with more comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
P and T
P and T Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信