{"title":"[主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术与经导管主动脉瓣植入术联合非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较]。","authors":"Ryuichiro Abe, Akira Iura, Takeshi Iritakenishi, Tatsuyuki Imada, Yuji Fujino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative management of aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (TAVI+OPCAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone either AVR+CABG or TAVI+OPCAB for AS and CAD in Osaka Univer- sity Medical Hospital from January to October, 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AVR+CABG was performed in 11 pa- tients (group A) and TAVI+OPCAB was performed in 4 patients (group T) in this period. The patients in group T was significantly older than the patients in group A. There were no significant differences in other background factors. Procedure time and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were shorter in group T than in group A. Postoperative recovery was signifi- cantly faster in group T than in group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI+OPCAB is less invasive than AVR+CABG and an effective treatment for high risk patient with AS and CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of Aortic Valve Replacement Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Combined with Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichiro Abe, Akira Iura, Takeshi Iritakenishi, Tatsuyuki Imada, Yuji Fujino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative management of aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (TAVI+OPCAB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone either AVR+CABG or TAVI+OPCAB for AS and CAD in Osaka Univer- sity Medical Hospital from January to October, 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AVR+CABG was performed in 11 pa- tients (group A) and TAVI+OPCAB was performed in 4 patients (group T) in this period. The patients in group T was significantly older than the patients in group A. There were no significant differences in other background factors. Procedure time and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were shorter in group T than in group A. Postoperative recovery was signifi- cantly faster in group T than in group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVI+OPCAB is less invasive than AVR+CABG and an effective treatment for high risk patient with AS and CAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Comparison of Aortic Valve Replacement Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Combined with Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting].
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative management of aortic valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (AVR+CABG) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (TAVI+OPCAB).
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who had undergone either AVR+CABG or TAVI+OPCAB for AS and CAD in Osaka Univer- sity Medical Hospital from January to October, 2014.
Results: AVR+CABG was performed in 11 pa- tients (group A) and TAVI+OPCAB was performed in 4 patients (group T) in this period. The patients in group T was significantly older than the patients in group A. There were no significant differences in other background factors. Procedure time and postoperative mechanical ventilation time were shorter in group T than in group A. Postoperative recovery was signifi- cantly faster in group T than in group A.
Conclusions: TAVI+OPCAB is less invasive than AVR+CABG and an effective treatment for high risk patient with AS and CAD.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
