[RSB和TAPB对腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的影响]。

Masato Iwata, Naoya Kuzumoto, Katsuhiro Kmoto, Yuka Akasaki, Masayo Morioka, Kana Nakayama, Nobuyoshi Matsuzawa, Toshiyuki Shimomura
{"title":"[RSB和TAPB对腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后疼痛的影响]。","authors":"Masato Iwata,&nbsp;Naoya Kuzumoto,&nbsp;Katsuhiro Kmoto,&nbsp;Yuka Akasaki,&nbsp;Masayo Morioka,&nbsp;Kana Nakayama,&nbsp;Nobuyoshi Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Shimomura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several reports have examined meth- ods to control pain after a laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy (LC) and have shown regional anesthesia to be an effective method. We had been performing LC using simple general anesthesia (G); however, in 2013, we adapted a rectus sheath block (RSB), and in 2014, we used a combination of RSB and a subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on the right side. We report on the transition from G to regional anesthesia in LC and its effect on postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We anesthetized three groups of patients undergoing LC. Group 1 received G (n =32) ; group 2 received RSB (n=28); and group 3 received a combination of RSB and TAPB (n=31). Patients used the numeric rating scale (NRS) to record their levels of postoperative pain, and the scores were compared for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were noted in NRS scores between the G and RSB groups; however, the scores in the RSB group tended to be lower. NRS scores were significantly lower in the RSB-TAPB group than in both the RSB and G groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the combina- tion of RSB-TAPB effectively controlled pain after LC and lowered NRS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":"66 2","pages":"127-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effects of RSB and TAPB on Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy].\",\"authors\":\"Masato Iwata,&nbsp;Naoya Kuzumoto,&nbsp;Katsuhiro Kmoto,&nbsp;Yuka Akasaki,&nbsp;Masayo Morioka,&nbsp;Kana Nakayama,&nbsp;Nobuyoshi Matsuzawa,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Shimomura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several reports have examined meth- ods to control pain after a laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy (LC) and have shown regional anesthesia to be an effective method. We had been performing LC using simple general anesthesia (G); however, in 2013, we adapted a rectus sheath block (RSB), and in 2014, we used a combination of RSB and a subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on the right side. We report on the transition from G to regional anesthesia in LC and its effect on postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We anesthetized three groups of patients undergoing LC. Group 1 received G (n =32) ; group 2 received RSB (n=28); and group 3 received a combination of RSB and TAPB (n=31). Patients used the numeric rating scale (NRS) to record their levels of postoperative pain, and the scores were compared for each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were noted in NRS scores between the G and RSB groups; however, the scores in the RSB group tended to be lower. NRS scores were significantly lower in the RSB-TAPB group than in both the RSB and G groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that the combina- tion of RSB-TAPB effectively controlled pain after LC and lowered NRS scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"127-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些报道已经研究了控制腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后疼痛的方法,并表明区域麻醉是一种有效的方法。我们一直在单纯全身麻醉下进行LC (G);然而,在2013年,我们采用了直肌鞘阻滞(RSB),并在2014年,我们在右侧使用了RSB和肋下腹横平面阻滞(TAPB)的组合。我们报道了LC从G麻醉到区域麻醉的过渡及其对术后疼痛的影响。方法:对三组行LC的患者进行麻醉。组1给予G (n =32);2组接受RSB治疗(n=28);第三组采用RSB + TAPB联合治疗(n=31)。患者使用数字评定量表(NRS)记录他们的术后疼痛水平,并对每组的评分进行比较。结果:G组与RSB组NRS评分差异无统计学意义;然而,RSB组的得分往往较低。RSB- tapb组的NRS评分明显低于RSB组和G组。结论:本研究显示RSB-TAPB联合应用能有效控制LC后疼痛,降低NRS评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Effects of RSB and TAPB on Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy].

Background: Several reports have examined meth- ods to control pain after a laparoscopic cholecystec- tomy (LC) and have shown regional anesthesia to be an effective method. We had been performing LC using simple general anesthesia (G); however, in 2013, we adapted a rectus sheath block (RSB), and in 2014, we used a combination of RSB and a subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on the right side. We report on the transition from G to regional anesthesia in LC and its effect on postoperative pain.

Methods: We anesthetized three groups of patients undergoing LC. Group 1 received G (n =32) ; group 2 received RSB (n=28); and group 3 received a combination of RSB and TAPB (n=31). Patients used the numeric rating scale (NRS) to record their levels of postoperative pain, and the scores were compared for each group.

Results: No significant differences were noted in NRS scores between the G and RSB groups; however, the scores in the RSB group tended to be lower. NRS scores were significantly lower in the RSB-TAPB group than in both the RSB and G groups.

Conclusions: This study showed that the combina- tion of RSB-TAPB effectively controlled pain after LC and lowered NRS scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信