环境政治中的科学数字与对抗:19世纪早期伦敦自来水公司采用的减烟技术。

Ayuka Kasuga
{"title":"环境政治中的科学数字与对抗:19世纪早期伦敦自来水公司采用的减烟技术。","authors":"Ayuka Kasuga","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines how scientific figures got involved in the confrontation observed in environmental politics. Researchers in environmental history showed that authorities and industries sometimes manipulate figures in order to deny the existence of, or their responsibility for pollution and environmental problems. This paper argues that manipulation of figures is not only the problem for polluters but also for the side against polluters such as environmental campaigners. It focuses on the ways in which smoke abatement technology was evaluated in early-nineteenth century England. Smoke abatement technology was the key in promoting smoke abatement, but it sometimes did not work as well as planned. This case study shows how figures taken from one experiment were used as evidence by both polluting industry and a promoter of smoke abatement technology in order to support their respective claims. It is concluded that scientific figures did not necessarily settle their difference. Scientific figures could rather deepen the confrontation.</p>","PeriodicalId":81754,"journal":{"name":"Kagakushi kenkyu. [Journal of the history of science, Japan","volume":"55 278","pages":"133-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Figures and Confrontation in Environmental Politics: Smoke Abatement Technology Adopted by a London Water Company in the Early Nineteenth Century.\",\"authors\":\"Ayuka Kasuga\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines how scientific figures got involved in the confrontation observed in environmental politics. Researchers in environmental history showed that authorities and industries sometimes manipulate figures in order to deny the existence of, or their responsibility for pollution and environmental problems. This paper argues that manipulation of figures is not only the problem for polluters but also for the side against polluters such as environmental campaigners. It focuses on the ways in which smoke abatement technology was evaluated in early-nineteenth century England. Smoke abatement technology was the key in promoting smoke abatement, but it sometimes did not work as well as planned. This case study shows how figures taken from one experiment were used as evidence by both polluting industry and a promoter of smoke abatement technology in order to support their respective claims. It is concluded that scientific figures did not necessarily settle their difference. Scientific figures could rather deepen the confrontation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kagakushi kenkyu. [Journal of the history of science, Japan\",\"volume\":\"55 278\",\"pages\":\"133-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kagakushi kenkyu. [Journal of the history of science, Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kagakushi kenkyu. [Journal of the history of science, Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了科学人物如何卷入环境政治中观察到的对抗。环境史研究人员表明,当局和企业有时会操纵数据,以否认污染和环境问题的存在,或否认他们对污染和环境问题的责任。本文认为,数据造假不仅是污染者的问题,也是反对污染者的问题,比如环保人士。它关注的是19世纪早期英国对烟雾减排技术的评估方式。消烟技术是促进消烟的关键,但有时效果不如预期。本案例研究表明,从一个实验中获得的数据如何被污染工业和烟雾减排技术的推动者用作证据,以支持他们各自的主张。结论是,科学数据不一定能解决他们的分歧。科学数据反而会加深这种对立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific Figures and Confrontation in Environmental Politics: Smoke Abatement Technology Adopted by a London Water Company in the Early Nineteenth Century.

This paper examines how scientific figures got involved in the confrontation observed in environmental politics. Researchers in environmental history showed that authorities and industries sometimes manipulate figures in order to deny the existence of, or their responsibility for pollution and environmental problems. This paper argues that manipulation of figures is not only the problem for polluters but also for the side against polluters such as environmental campaigners. It focuses on the ways in which smoke abatement technology was evaluated in early-nineteenth century England. Smoke abatement technology was the key in promoting smoke abatement, but it sometimes did not work as well as planned. This case study shows how figures taken from one experiment were used as evidence by both polluting industry and a promoter of smoke abatement technology in order to support their respective claims. It is concluded that scientific figures did not necessarily settle their difference. Scientific figures could rather deepen the confrontation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信