西弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区的个人口腔感染控制、低出生体重和早产:一项横断面研究。

Advances in Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2018-08-07 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/9618507
R Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters
{"title":"西弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区的个人口腔感染控制、低出生体重和早产:一项横断面研究。","authors":"R Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters","doi":"10.1155/2018/9618507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appalachia West Virginia has a higher prevalence of preterm and low birthweight babies than the US national prevalence. Many factors have been studied which are known to influence preterm births and low birthweight babies. There are limited interventions that are available to decrease the likelihood of preterm and low birthweight babies; however oral health and personal oral infection control may be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of limited personal oral infection control among pregnant West Virginia Appalachian women and poor birth outcomes (preterm and low birthweight babies).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of data from the West Virginia Healthy Start Helping Appalachian Parents and Infants (HAPI) Project from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. The researchers determined the odds ratio of personal oral infection control with a powered toothbrush (use of the brush fewer than 13 times per week versus use of the brush 13 or more times per week) on poor birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 845 women who completed the oral health program within the HAPI project. In unadjusted logistic regression, women who used the powered toothbrush and brushed less frequently had greater odds of poor birth outcomes than women who brushed more frequently (odds ratio of 2.07 [1.18, 3.62] <i>P</i> = 0.011 for low birthweight babies; and an odds ratio of 1.78 [1.04, 3.02] <i>P</i> = 0.034 for preterm birth). The results remained positive but were no longer significant in adjusted analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to identify interventions that will benefit pregnant women so that their pregnancies result in healthy pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7388,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personal Oral Infection Control, Low Birthweight, and Preterm Births in Appalachia West Virginia: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"R Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/9618507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Appalachia West Virginia has a higher prevalence of preterm and low birthweight babies than the US national prevalence. Many factors have been studied which are known to influence preterm births and low birthweight babies. There are limited interventions that are available to decrease the likelihood of preterm and low birthweight babies; however oral health and personal oral infection control may be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of limited personal oral infection control among pregnant West Virginia Appalachian women and poor birth outcomes (preterm and low birthweight babies).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary data analysis of data from the West Virginia Healthy Start Helping Appalachian Parents and Infants (HAPI) Project from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. The researchers determined the odds ratio of personal oral infection control with a powered toothbrush (use of the brush fewer than 13 times per week versus use of the brush 13 or more times per week) on poor birth outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 845 women who completed the oral health program within the HAPI project. In unadjusted logistic regression, women who used the powered toothbrush and brushed less frequently had greater odds of poor birth outcomes than women who brushed more frequently (odds ratio of 2.07 [1.18, 3.62] <i>P</i> = 0.011 for low birthweight babies; and an odds ratio of 1.78 [1.04, 3.02] <i>P</i> = 0.034 for preterm birth). The results remained positive but were no longer significant in adjusted analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need to identify interventions that will benefit pregnant women so that their pregnancies result in healthy pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6106793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9618507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9618507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言西弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区早产儿和低出生体重儿的发病率高于美国全国的发病率。目前已对影响早产和低出生体重儿的许多因素进行了研究。目前可用于降低早产儿和低出生体重儿发生率的干预措施有限,但口腔健康和个人口腔感染控制可能会有所帮助。本研究的目的是评估西弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区孕妇个人口腔感染控制有限与不良分娩结局(早产儿和低出生体重儿)之间的关联:研究人员对西弗吉尼亚州健康起步帮助阿巴拉契亚父母和婴儿(HAPI)项目 2005 年至 2016 年的数据进行了二次数据分析。研究人员确定了使用电动牙刷控制个人口腔感染(每周使用电动牙刷少于 13 次与每周使用电动牙刷 13 次或以上)对不良出生结果的几率比例:共有 845 名妇女完成了 HAPI 项目中的口腔健康计划。在未经调整的逻辑回归中,使用电动牙刷且刷牙次数较少的妇女比刷牙次数较多的妇女发生不良分娩结局的几率更大(低出生体重儿的几率比为 2.07 [1.18, 3.62] P = 0.011;早产儿的几率比为 1.78 [1.04, 3.02] P = 0.034)。结果仍然是积极的,但在调整分析中不再显著:有必要确定对孕妇有益的干预措施,以使她们的妊娠结果健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Personal Oral Infection Control, Low Birthweight, and Preterm Births in Appalachia West Virginia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Appalachia West Virginia has a higher prevalence of preterm and low birthweight babies than the US national prevalence. Many factors have been studied which are known to influence preterm births and low birthweight babies. There are limited interventions that are available to decrease the likelihood of preterm and low birthweight babies; however oral health and personal oral infection control may be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of limited personal oral infection control among pregnant West Virginia Appalachian women and poor birth outcomes (preterm and low birthweight babies).

Methods: A secondary data analysis of data from the West Virginia Healthy Start Helping Appalachian Parents and Infants (HAPI) Project from 2005 to 2016 was conducted. The researchers determined the odds ratio of personal oral infection control with a powered toothbrush (use of the brush fewer than 13 times per week versus use of the brush 13 or more times per week) on poor birth outcomes.

Results: There were 845 women who completed the oral health program within the HAPI project. In unadjusted logistic regression, women who used the powered toothbrush and brushed less frequently had greater odds of poor birth outcomes than women who brushed more frequently (odds ratio of 2.07 [1.18, 3.62] P = 0.011 for low birthweight babies; and an odds ratio of 1.78 [1.04, 3.02] P = 0.034 for preterm birth). The results remained positive but were no longer significant in adjusted analysis.

Conclusion: There is a need to identify interventions that will benefit pregnant women so that their pregnancies result in healthy pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信