(NEEDLESCOPIC手术)。

Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Nobumi Tagaya
{"title":"(NEEDLESCOPIC手术)。","authors":"Nobumi Tagaya","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We define needlescopic surgery (NS) as endoscopic surgery performed with 2- to 3-mm needlescopic instruments, and it has received attention as a form of reduced-port surgery. Reports on NS have been published since 1998, and their number has gradually increased. A Japanese study group called the “Needlescopic Surgery Meeting” was established in October 2000. The advantages of NS are improved cosmetic results and reduced postoperative pain. Although the cosmetic results of NS are inferior to those of single-incision endoscopic surgery, the creation of an operative field is similar to that using the conventional method, and NS involves less stress on surgeons. In the comparison of postoperative pain among conventional, single-incision, and needlescopic techniques, the amount of postoperative analgesics required after the needlescopic technique is significantly (p<0.001) less than that after the other techniques. The disadvantages of NS are the poorer image quality of the needlescope, difficulty in grasping due to the fine shaft of the instruments, and difficulty in creating the operative field. If we understand the specific details of needlescopic instruments and endeavor to use them properly to avoid intra- and postoperative complications, NS will become more advanced in cooperation with single-incision endoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19165,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"117 5","pages":"370-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[NEEDLESCOPIC SURGERY].\",\"authors\":\"Nobumi Tagaya\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We define needlescopic surgery (NS) as endoscopic surgery performed with 2- to 3-mm needlescopic instruments, and it has received attention as a form of reduced-port surgery. Reports on NS have been published since 1998, and their number has gradually increased. A Japanese study group called the “Needlescopic Surgery Meeting” was established in October 2000. The advantages of NS are improved cosmetic results and reduced postoperative pain. Although the cosmetic results of NS are inferior to those of single-incision endoscopic surgery, the creation of an operative field is similar to that using the conventional method, and NS involves less stress on surgeons. In the comparison of postoperative pain among conventional, single-incision, and needlescopic techniques, the amount of postoperative analgesics required after the needlescopic technique is significantly (p<0.001) less than that after the other techniques. The disadvantages of NS are the poorer image quality of the needlescope, difficulty in grasping due to the fine shaft of the instruments, and difficulty in creating the operative field. If we understand the specific details of needlescopic instruments and endeavor to use them properly to avoid intra- and postoperative complications, NS will become more advanced in cooperation with single-incision endoscopic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"370-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Geka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将针镜手术(NS)定义为使用2- 3毫米的针镜器械进行的内窥镜手术,它作为一种减少端口手术的形式受到了关注。自1998年以来,有关国家统计局的报告陆续发表,数目逐渐增加。2000年10月,日本成立了一个名为“针镜手术会议”的研究小组。NS的优点是改善了美容效果,减少了术后疼痛。虽然NS的美容效果不如单切口内窥镜手术,但手术野的创建与传统方法相似,并且NS对外科医生的压力较小。在比较常规、单切口和针镜技术的术后疼痛时,针镜技术术后所需镇痛药的量明显少于其他技术(p<0.001)。NS的缺点是针镜图像质量较差,由于器械的细轴而难以抓取,难以形成手术场。如果我们了解针镜器械的具体细节,并努力正确使用,避免术中术后并发症,NS与单切口内镜手术配合将会更加先进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[NEEDLESCOPIC SURGERY].

We define needlescopic surgery (NS) as endoscopic surgery performed with 2- to 3-mm needlescopic instruments, and it has received attention as a form of reduced-port surgery. Reports on NS have been published since 1998, and their number has gradually increased. A Japanese study group called the “Needlescopic Surgery Meeting” was established in October 2000. The advantages of NS are improved cosmetic results and reduced postoperative pain. Although the cosmetic results of NS are inferior to those of single-incision endoscopic surgery, the creation of an operative field is similar to that using the conventional method, and NS involves less stress on surgeons. In the comparison of postoperative pain among conventional, single-incision, and needlescopic techniques, the amount of postoperative analgesics required after the needlescopic technique is significantly (p<0.001) less than that after the other techniques. The disadvantages of NS are the poorer image quality of the needlescope, difficulty in grasping due to the fine shaft of the instruments, and difficulty in creating the operative field. If we understand the specific details of needlescopic instruments and endeavor to use them properly to avoid intra- and postoperative complications, NS will become more advanced in cooperation with single-incision endoscopic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信