种族对南非接受全身麻醉的中高风险患者术后恶心和呕吐发生率的影响:一项对照观察性研究。

A Alli, S Omar, S Tsang, B I Naik
{"title":"种族对南非接受全身麻醉的中高风险患者术后恶心和呕吐发生率的影响:一项对照观察性研究。","authors":"A Alli,&nbsp;S Omar,&nbsp;S Tsang,&nbsp;B I Naik","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted this prospective controlled observational study to compare the effect of ethnicity on the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between moderate to high-risk African and non-African patients undergoing general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Apfel score risk factors and predicted length of surgery (>30 minutes), 89 moderate to high risk patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited in a university hospital between March 2009 and November 2010. Thirty patients in the non-African group and 59 patients in the African group were allocated using an ethnicity self identification questionnaire. Intraoperative anesthesia was standardized. PONV was assessed at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 90 minutes, 180 minutes, and 24 hours. Generalized linear mixed effects models was used to determine the effect of ethnicity on PONV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite similar Apfel scores, cumulative incidence of postoperative nausea was higher in the non-African group at 0 minutes (46.67% vs 22.03%, <i>P =</i> 0.019), 15 minutes (70% vs 23.73%, p<0.001) and 90 minutes (36.67% vs 16.95%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The non-African group had more episodes of vomiting over 24 hours (13.33% vs 1.69%, <i>P</i> = 0.055). Non-Africans had a 25 times higher reported nausea incidence than Africans over 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of PONV in non-Africans is significantly higher than in Africans. Non-African ethnicity is an independent risk factor for PONV. Current risk prediction models may be limited in multi-ethnic populations and further investigations are warranted to examine ethnicity as a risk factor.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103314/pdf/nihms932288.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN MODERATE TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CONTROLLED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.\",\"authors\":\"A Alli,&nbsp;S Omar,&nbsp;S Tsang,&nbsp;B I Naik\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted this prospective controlled observational study to compare the effect of ethnicity on the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between moderate to high-risk African and non-African patients undergoing general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Apfel score risk factors and predicted length of surgery (>30 minutes), 89 moderate to high risk patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited in a university hospital between March 2009 and November 2010. Thirty patients in the non-African group and 59 patients in the African group were allocated using an ethnicity self identification questionnaire. Intraoperative anesthesia was standardized. PONV was assessed at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 90 minutes, 180 minutes, and 24 hours. Generalized linear mixed effects models was used to determine the effect of ethnicity on PONV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite similar Apfel scores, cumulative incidence of postoperative nausea was higher in the non-African group at 0 minutes (46.67% vs 22.03%, <i>P =</i> 0.019), 15 minutes (70% vs 23.73%, p<0.001) and 90 minutes (36.67% vs 16.95%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). The non-African group had more episodes of vomiting over 24 hours (13.33% vs 1.69%, <i>P</i> = 0.055). Non-Africans had a 25 times higher reported nausea incidence than Africans over 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of PONV in non-Africans is significantly higher than in Africans. Non-African ethnicity is an independent risk factor for PONV. Current risk prediction models may be limited in multi-ethnic populations and further investigations are warranted to examine ethnicity as a risk factor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6103314/pdf/nihms932288.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们进行了这项前瞻性对照观察性研究,比较种族对接受全身麻醉的中等至高危非洲和非非洲患者术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)风险的影响。方法:采用Apfel评分危险因素和预测手术时间(>30分钟),于2009年3月至2010年11月在某大学附属医院进行全身麻醉的中高危患者89例。非非洲组的30名患者和非洲组的59名患者使用种族自我认同问卷进行分配。术中麻醉标准化。分别在0分钟、15分钟、90分钟、180分钟和24小时评估PONV。采用广义线性混合效应模型确定种族对PONV的影响。结果:尽管Apfel评分相似,但非非洲组术后恶心的累积发生率在0分钟(46.67% vs 22.03%, P = 0.019)和15分钟(70% vs 23.73%, pP = 0.04)时更高。非非洲组在24小时内呕吐次数较多(13.33% vs 1.69%, P = 0.055)。在24小时内,非非洲人报告的恶心发生率是非洲人的25倍。结论:非非洲人的PONV发病率明显高于非洲人。非非洲族裔是PONV的独立危险因素。目前的风险预测模型在多种族人群中可能受到限制,需要进一步的调查来检查种族是否是一个风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN MODERATE TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CONTROLLED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.

THE EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN MODERATE TO HIGH RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CONTROLLED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.

Background: We conducted this prospective controlled observational study to compare the effect of ethnicity on the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between moderate to high-risk African and non-African patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Methods: Using Apfel score risk factors and predicted length of surgery (>30 minutes), 89 moderate to high risk patients undergoing general anesthesia were recruited in a university hospital between March 2009 and November 2010. Thirty patients in the non-African group and 59 patients in the African group were allocated using an ethnicity self identification questionnaire. Intraoperative anesthesia was standardized. PONV was assessed at 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 90 minutes, 180 minutes, and 24 hours. Generalized linear mixed effects models was used to determine the effect of ethnicity on PONV.

Results: Despite similar Apfel scores, cumulative incidence of postoperative nausea was higher in the non-African group at 0 minutes (46.67% vs 22.03%, P = 0.019), 15 minutes (70% vs 23.73%, p<0.001) and 90 minutes (36.67% vs 16.95%, P = 0.04). The non-African group had more episodes of vomiting over 24 hours (13.33% vs 1.69%, P = 0.055). Non-Africans had a 25 times higher reported nausea incidence than Africans over 24 hours.

Conclusion: The incidence of PONV in non-Africans is significantly higher than in Africans. Non-African ethnicity is an independent risk factor for PONV. Current risk prediction models may be limited in multi-ethnic populations and further investigations are warranted to examine ethnicity as a risk factor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信