分析内血压变化对心血管预后的影响与维持性血液透析患者的容量状态无关

Q1 Medicine
Jungho Shin MD, PhD , Seongyup Yeo MD , Jun Young Hong MD , Jin Ho Hwang MD, PhD , Su Hyun Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"分析内血压变化对心血管预后的影响与维持性血液透析患者的容量状态无关","authors":"Jungho Shin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Seongyup Yeo MD ,&nbsp;Jun Young Hong MD ,&nbsp;Jin Ho Hwang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Su Hyun Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes are related to the volume status; however, whether SBP change impacts on </span>adverse outcomes<span> depends on the volume status remains uncertain. We retrospectively investigated the relationship among intradialytic changes in SBP, cardiovascular outcomes, and volume status in maintenance hemodialysis<span> patients. We determined SBP changes (ΔSBP) as postdialysis SBP minus predialysis SBP and volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using bioelectrical impedance analysis. There were 82 (60.3%) with ΔSBP −20 to 10 mm Hg, 21 (15.4%) with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg, and 33 (24.3%) with ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg, and they were followed up for a median of 34 months. Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in the patients with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg and ≥ 10 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 2.3 and 3.0; </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .062 and .006); these associations persisted even after adjusting for postdialysis ECW/TBW (<em>P</em><span> = .056 and .028). Moreover, ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortalities independent of postdialysis ECW/TBW (</span><em>P</em> = .043). There was an independent association of volume status between considerable SBP decrease or increase during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besides appropriate volume control, other factors related to BP changes during hemodialysis must be investigated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of intradialytic blood pressure changes on cardiovascular outcomes is independent of the volume status of maintenance hemodialysis patients\",\"authors\":\"Jungho Shin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Seongyup Yeo MD ,&nbsp;Jun Young Hong MD ,&nbsp;Jin Ho Hwang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Su Hyun Kim MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes are related to the volume status; however, whether SBP change impacts on </span>adverse outcomes<span> depends on the volume status remains uncertain. We retrospectively investigated the relationship among intradialytic changes in SBP, cardiovascular outcomes, and volume status in maintenance hemodialysis<span> patients. We determined SBP changes (ΔSBP) as postdialysis SBP minus predialysis SBP and volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using bioelectrical impedance analysis. There were 82 (60.3%) with ΔSBP −20 to 10 mm Hg, 21 (15.4%) with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg, and 33 (24.3%) with ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg, and they were followed up for a median of 34 months. Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in the patients with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg and ≥ 10 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 2.3 and 3.0; </span></span></span><em>P</em> = .062 and .006); these associations persisted even after adjusting for postdialysis ECW/TBW (<em>P</em><span> = .056 and .028). Moreover, ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortalities independent of postdialysis ECW/TBW (</span><em>P</em> = .043). There was an independent association of volume status between considerable SBP decrease or increase during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besides appropriate volume control, other factors related to BP changes during hemodialysis must be investigated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jash.2018.06.011\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118301906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933171118301906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

分析期收缩压(SBP)变化与容积状态有关;然而,收缩压变化是否影响不良后果取决于容量状态仍不确定。我们回顾性地研究了维持性血液透析患者的舒张压、心血管结局和容量状态之间的关系。我们使用生物电阻抗分析确定了透析后收缩压变化(ΔSBP)减去透析前收缩压,以及细胞外水与全身水之比(ECW/TBW)的体积状态。82例(60.3%)为ΔSBP−20 ~ 10 mm Hg, 21例(15.4%)为ΔSBP≤- 20 mm Hg, 33例(24.3%)为ΔSBP≥10 mm Hg,中位随访时间为34个月。心血管事件多发于ΔSBP≤- 20 mm Hg和≥10 mm Hg的患者(风险比:2.3和3.0;P = 0.062和0.006);即使在调整透析后ECW/TBW后,这些相关性仍然存在(P = 0.056和0.028)。此外,ΔSBP≥10 mm Hg与心血管死亡率增加相关,与透析后ECW/TBW无关(P = 0.043)。血液透析期间收缩压显著降低或升高与心血管不良结局之间的容积状态存在独立关联。除了适当的容积控制外,血液透析过程中与血压变化有关的其他因素也必须加以研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of intradialytic blood pressure changes on cardiovascular outcomes is independent of the volume status of maintenance hemodialysis patients

Intradialytic systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes are related to the volume status; however, whether SBP change impacts on adverse outcomes depends on the volume status remains uncertain. We retrospectively investigated the relationship among intradialytic changes in SBP, cardiovascular outcomes, and volume status in maintenance hemodialysis patients. We determined SBP changes (ΔSBP) as postdialysis SBP minus predialysis SBP and volume status as the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) using bioelectrical impedance analysis. There were 82 (60.3%) with ΔSBP −20 to 10 mm Hg, 21 (15.4%) with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg, and 33 (24.3%) with ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg, and they were followed up for a median of 34 months. Cardiovascular events more frequently occurred in the patients with ΔSBP ≤ −20 mm Hg and ≥ 10 mm Hg (hazard ratio: 2.3 and 3.0; P = .062 and .006); these associations persisted even after adjusting for postdialysis ECW/TBW (P = .056 and .028). Moreover, ΔSBP ≥ 10 mm Hg was associated with increased cardiovascular mortalities independent of postdialysis ECW/TBW (P = .043). There was an independent association of volume status between considerable SBP decrease or increase during hemodialysis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Besides appropriate volume control, other factors related to BP changes during hemodialysis must be investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. The Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) publishes peer-reviewed articles on the topics of basic, applied and translational research on blood pressure, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders and factors; as well as clinical research and clinical trials in hypertension. Original research studies, reviews, hypotheses, editorial commentary and special reports spanning the spectrum of human and experimental animal and tissue research will be considered. All research studies must have been conducted following animal welfare guidelines. Studies involving human subjects or tissues must have received approval of the appropriate institutional committee charged with oversight of human studies and informed consent must be obtained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信