姑息治疗课程重新构想:对英国姑息治疗医学大纲的批判性评价。

Palliative Care Pub Date : 2018-05-29 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1178224218780375

Julian Abel, Allan Kellehear

{"title":"姑息治疗课程重新构想:对英国姑息治疗医学大纲的批判性评价。","authors":"Julian Abel, Allan Kellehear","doi":"10.1177/1178224218780375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus is critically evaluated to assess its relationship and relevance to contemporary palliative care policy and direction. Three criteria are employed for this review: (1) relevance to non-cancer dying, ageing, caregivers, and bereaved populations; (2) uptake and adoption of well-being models of public health alongside traditional illness and disease models of clinical understanding; and (3) uptake and integration of public health insights and methodologies for social support. We conclude that the current syllabus falls dramatically short on all 3 criteria. Suggestions are made for future consultation and revision.","PeriodicalId":56348,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178224218780375","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Curriculum Re-imagined: A Critical Evaluation of the UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus.\",\"authors\":\"Julian Abel, Allan Kellehear\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1178224218780375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus is critically evaluated to assess its relationship and relevance to contemporary palliative care policy and direction. Three criteria are employed for this review: (1) relevance to non-cancer dying, ageing, caregivers, and bereaved populations; (2) uptake and adoption of well-being models of public health alongside traditional illness and disease models of clinical understanding; and (3) uptake and integration of public health insights and methodologies for social support. We conclude that the current syllabus falls dramatically short on all 3 criteria. Suggestions are made for future consultation and revision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1178224218780375\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178224218780375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1178224218780375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

英国姑息医学教学大纲是严格评估，以评估其关系和相关性的当代姑息治疗政策和方向。本综述采用了三个标准:(1)与非癌症死亡、老龄化、照顾者和丧亲人群的相关性;(2)与传统疾病和临床理解的疾病模型一起吸收和采用公共卫生的福祉模型;(3)吸收和整合社会支持方面的公共卫生见解和方法。我们得出的结论是，目前的教学大纲在这三个标准上都远远不够。提出建议，供今后咨询和修订。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Palliative Curriculum Re-imagined: A Critical Evaluation of the UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus.

The UK Palliative Medicine Syllabus is critically evaluated to assess its relationship and relevance to contemporary palliative care policy and direction. Three criteria are employed for this review: (1) relevance to non-cancer dying, ageing, caregivers, and bereaved populations; (2) uptake and adoption of well-being models of public health alongside traditional illness and disease models of clinical understanding; and (3) uptake and integration of public health insights and methodologies for social support. We conclude that the current syllabus falls dramatically short on all 3 criteria. Suggestions are made for future consultation and revision.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Palliative Care

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Palliative Care and Social Practice is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes articles on all aspects of palliative care. It welcomes articles from symptom science, clinical practice, and health services research. However, its aim is also to publish cutting-edge research from the realm of social practice - from public health theory and practice, social medicine, and social work, to social sciences related to dying and its care, as well as policy, criticism, and cultural studies. We encourage reports from work with under-represented groups, community development, and studies of civic engagement in end of life issues. Furthermore, we encourage scholarly articles that challenge current thinking about dying, its current care models and practices, and current understandings of grief and bereavement. We want to showcase the next generation of palliative care innovation research and practice - in clinics and in the wider society. Relaunched in July 2019. Partnered with Public Health Palliative Care International (PHPCI) (Title 2008-2018: - Palliative Care: Research and Treatment)