单冠种植体-基台连接:系统回顾。

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-01-21 eCollection Date: 2017-10-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349
F M Ceruso, P Barnaba, S Mazzoleni, L Ottria, M Gargari, A Zuccon, G Bruno, A DI Fiore
{"title":"单冠种植体-基台连接:系统回顾。","authors":"F M Ceruso,&nbsp;P Barnaba,&nbsp;S Mazzoleni,&nbsp;L Ottria,&nbsp;M Gargari,&nbsp;A Zuccon,&nbsp;G Bruno,&nbsp;A DI Fiore","doi":"10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different implant-abutment connections have been developed in the effort of reducing mechanical and biological failure. The most frequent complications are screw loosening, abutment or implant fracture and marginal bone loss due to overload and bacterial micro-leakage. Ideal connection should work as a one-piece implant avoiding the formation of a micro-gap at the implant-abutment interface. Different <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> researches have been published to compare the implant-abutment connections actually available: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical finding different amount of micro-gap, micro-leakage and marginal bone loss. The aim of this article is to describe, according to the most recent literature, different kind of fixture-abutment connections and their clinical and mechanical advantages or disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"10 4","pages":"349-353"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"F M Ceruso,&nbsp;P Barnaba,&nbsp;S Mazzoleni,&nbsp;L Ottria,&nbsp;M Gargari,&nbsp;A Zuccon,&nbsp;G Bruno,&nbsp;A DI Fiore\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different implant-abutment connections have been developed in the effort of reducing mechanical and biological failure. The most frequent complications are screw loosening, abutment or implant fracture and marginal bone loss due to overload and bacterial micro-leakage. Ideal connection should work as a one-piece implant avoiding the formation of a micro-gap at the implant-abutment interface. Different <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> researches have been published to compare the implant-abutment connections actually available: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical finding different amount of micro-gap, micro-leakage and marginal bone loss. The aim of this article is to describe, according to the most recent literature, different kind of fixture-abutment connections and their clinical and mechanical advantages or disadvantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"349-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.4.349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

不同的种植体-基台连接已经开发出来,以减少机械和生物失效。最常见的并发症是螺钉松动、基台或种植体骨折以及由于超载和细菌微渗漏导致的边缘骨丢失。理想的连接方式应为一体式种植体,避免在种植体-基台界面处形成微间隙。不同的体外和体内研究已经发表,比较了实际可用的种植体-基台连接:外六边形、内六边形和锥形,发现不同数量的微间隙、微渗漏和边缘骨丢失。本文的目的是描述,根据最新的文献,不同类型的夹具-基台连接及其临床和机械的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: a systematic review.

Different implant-abutment connections have been developed in the effort of reducing mechanical and biological failure. The most frequent complications are screw loosening, abutment or implant fracture and marginal bone loss due to overload and bacterial micro-leakage. Ideal connection should work as a one-piece implant avoiding the formation of a micro-gap at the implant-abutment interface. Different in vitro and in vivo researches have been published to compare the implant-abutment connections actually available: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical finding different amount of micro-gap, micro-leakage and marginal bone loss. The aim of this article is to describe, according to the most recent literature, different kind of fixture-abutment connections and their clinical and mechanical advantages or disadvantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信