非粉刺性和非痤疮性的声明证实。

IF 0.2 4区医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED

Journal of cosmetic science Pub Date : 2017-07-01

Craig Weiss, Michael Caswell

{"title":"非粉刺性和非痤疮性的声明证实。","authors":"Craig Weiss, Michael Caswell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are currently two methods to evaluate comedogenecity. One is the inexpensive human model developed by Mills and Kligman and modified by others. The second is the more costly human clinical trial, which is the gold standard for comedogenesis and to which the human model is compared. The qualification of each method to support the comedogenecity claim is evaluated and contrasted.","PeriodicalId":15523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cosmetic science","volume":"68 4","pages":"253-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic claim substantiation.\",\"authors\":\"Craig Weiss, Michael Caswell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are currently two methods to evaluate comedogenecity. One is the inexpensive human model developed by Mills and Kligman and modified by others. The second is the more costly human clinical trial, which is the gold standard for comedogenesis and to which the human model is compared. The qualification of each method to support the comedogenecity claim is evaluated and contrasted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"253-256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cosmetic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cosmetic science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目前有两种方法来评估粉刺的发生。一种是由米尔斯和克利格曼开发并经过其他人改进的廉价人体模型。第二种是更昂贵的人体临床试验，这是粉刺形成的黄金标准，与人体模型进行比较。评估和对比了支持粉刺性权利要求的每种方法的资格。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Non-comedogenic and non-acnegenic claim substantiation.

There are currently two methods to evaluate comedogenecity. One is the inexpensive human model developed by Mills and Kligman and modified by others. The second is the more costly human clinical trial, which is the gold standard for comedogenesis and to which the human model is compared. The qualification of each method to support the comedogenecity claim is evaluated and contrasted.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of cosmetic science 工程技术-皮肤病学

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE (JCS) publishes papers concerned with cosmetics, cosmetic products, fragrances, their formulation and their effects in skin care or in overall consumer well-being, as well as papers relating to the sciences underlying cosmetics, such as human skin physiology, color physics, physical chemistry of colloids and emulsions, or psychological effects of olfaction in humans. Papers of interest to the cosmetic industry and to the understanding of the cosmetic markets are also welcome for publication.