消费者对食品和药物管理局最新推荐的食品设施检查格式的看法:文字很重要。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Journal of Environmental Health Pub Date : 2017-06-01
Jooho Kim, Jing Ma, Barbara Almanza
{"title":"消费者对食品和药物管理局最新推荐的食品设施检查格式的看法:文字很重要。","authors":"Jooho Kim,&nbsp;Jing Ma,&nbsp;Barbara Almanza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration recommended restaurant inspection scores change to a format that incorporated three new categories of violations: priority, priority foundation, and core. It was uncertain whether interested consumers would value the more in-depth information or become more confused. The purpose of this study was to assess consumer perception of the recommended inspection system. Data were collected from an online survey. Results showed that consumers want convenient access to the information either online or on the wall of restaurants, and some consumers do want to read inspection reports and use them in making dining decisions. Choice of restaurant inspection format did appear to change consumer understanding and perceptions about some of the violations. Results also demonstrated the importance of the words used to categorize violations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15713,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health","volume":"79 10","pages":"20-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer Perception of the Food and Drug Administration's Newest Recommended Food Facility Inspection Format: Words Matter.\",\"authors\":\"Jooho Kim,&nbsp;Jing Ma,&nbsp;Barbara Almanza\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Food and Drug Administration recommended restaurant inspection scores change to a format that incorporated three new categories of violations: priority, priority foundation, and core. It was uncertain whether interested consumers would value the more in-depth information or become more confused. The purpose of this study was to assess consumer perception of the recommended inspection system. Data were collected from an online survey. Results showed that consumers want convenient access to the information either online or on the wall of restaurants, and some consumers do want to read inspection reports and use them in making dining decisions. Choice of restaurant inspection format did appear to change consumer understanding and perceptions about some of the violations. Results also demonstrated the importance of the words used to categorize violations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"volume\":\"79 10\",\"pages\":\"20-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局(fda)建议将餐馆检查分数改为包含三个新类别的格式:优先、优先基础和核心。不确定感兴趣的消费者是否会重视更深入的信息,还是会变得更加困惑。本研究的目的是评估消费者对推荐的检验系统的看法。数据来自一项在线调查。调查结果显示,消费者希望方便地在网上或餐馆的墙上获取信息,一些消费者确实希望阅读检查报告并在做出用餐决定时使用它们。餐馆检查形式的选择似乎确实改变了消费者对一些违规行为的理解和看法。结果还显示了用于对违规行为进行分类的词语的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consumer Perception of the Food and Drug Administration's Newest Recommended Food Facility Inspection Format: Words Matter.

The Food and Drug Administration recommended restaurant inspection scores change to a format that incorporated three new categories of violations: priority, priority foundation, and core. It was uncertain whether interested consumers would value the more in-depth information or become more confused. The purpose of this study was to assess consumer perception of the recommended inspection system. Data were collected from an online survey. Results showed that consumers want convenient access to the information either online or on the wall of restaurants, and some consumers do want to read inspection reports and use them in making dining decisions. Choice of restaurant inspection format did appear to change consumer understanding and perceptions about some of the violations. Results also demonstrated the importance of the words used to categorize violations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health
Journal of Environmental Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Health (JEH) is published 10 times per year by the National Environmental Health Association and keeps readers up-to-date on current issues, new research, useful products and services, and employment opportunities. As the only direct link to the complete spectrum of environmental health topics, the JEH reaches more than 20,000 professionals working to solve problems in areas such as air quality, drinking water, food safety and protection, hazardous materials/toxic substances management, institutional environmental health, occupational safety and health, terrorism and all-hazards preparedness, vector control, wastewater management, and water pollution control/water quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信