聚焦激光在抗血管内皮生长因子时代的作用。

Ophthalmology and eye diseases Pub Date : 2017-11-21 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179172117738240
Jason N Crosson, Lauren Mason, John O Mason
{"title":"聚焦激光在抗血管内皮生长因子时代的作用。","authors":"Jason N Crosson,&nbsp;Lauren Mason,&nbsp;John O Mason","doi":"10.1177/1179172117738240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To review important studies examining focal laser for diabetic macular edema (DME), to examine real-world data regarding actual treatments patients are receiving, to present long-term visual outcomes in real-world practice, and to suggest an evidence-based approach for the use of focal laser.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a review of landmark studies evaluating focal laser and pharmacologic therapy for DME. In addition, the authors include a retrospective review of 102 consecutive eyes of 53 patients in our practice setting in rural Alabama. A chart review was performed, and patients were included if they were diagnosed with DME and were treated with both focal laser and bevacizumab. Bevacizumab and focal laser were given on a \"as needed basis\" at the discretion of one treating physician (J.O.M.). Worse visual acuity or worsening macular edema were indications for additional treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and percentages. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded at baseline and at the end of treatment (mean of 5 years) in the medical record. Primary outcome measures were BCVA, patients with better than 20/40 BCVA, patients with worse than 20/200 BCVA, and patients with stable BCVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the first-line treatment for DME, but real-world claims data suggest that diabetic patients cannot come in for monthly injections as in large clinical trials. In our series, after a mean of 5 lasers and 5.5 injections, 90% of eyes had stable or better BCVA, 65% were ≥20/40, and only 13% were ≤20/200.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser treatment for DME remains an important adjunctive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74362,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and eye diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1179172117738240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179172117738240","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Focal Laser in the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Era.\",\"authors\":\"Jason N Crosson,&nbsp;Lauren Mason,&nbsp;John O Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179172117738240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To review important studies examining focal laser for diabetic macular edema (DME), to examine real-world data regarding actual treatments patients are receiving, to present long-term visual outcomes in real-world practice, and to suggest an evidence-based approach for the use of focal laser.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a review of landmark studies evaluating focal laser and pharmacologic therapy for DME. In addition, the authors include a retrospective review of 102 consecutive eyes of 53 patients in our practice setting in rural Alabama. A chart review was performed, and patients were included if they were diagnosed with DME and were treated with both focal laser and bevacizumab. Bevacizumab and focal laser were given on a \\\"as needed basis\\\" at the discretion of one treating physician (J.O.M.). Worse visual acuity or worsening macular edema were indications for additional treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and percentages. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded at baseline and at the end of treatment (mean of 5 years) in the medical record. Primary outcome measures were BCVA, patients with better than 20/40 BCVA, patients with worse than 20/200 BCVA, and patients with stable BCVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the first-line treatment for DME, but real-world claims data suggest that diabetic patients cannot come in for monthly injections as in large clinical trials. In our series, after a mean of 5 lasers and 5.5 injections, 90% of eyes had stable or better BCVA, 65% were ≥20/40, and only 13% were ≤20/200.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser treatment for DME remains an important adjunctive therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology and eye diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1179172117738240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179172117738240\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology and eye diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179172117738240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and eye diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179172117738240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

简介:回顾检查局灶性激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的重要研究,检查有关患者正在接受的实际治疗的真实世界数据,展示现实世界实践中的长期视力结果,并建议一种基于证据的方法来使用局灶性激光。方法:本研究回顾了评价局部激光和药物治疗二甲醚的里程碑式研究。此外,作者还对我们在阿拉巴马州农村的53名患者的102个连续眼睛进行了回顾性审查。进行图表回顾,如果患者被诊断为DME并同时接受局灶激光和贝伐单抗治疗,则纳入患者。贝伐单抗和局部激光治疗是在“需要的基础上”由一位治疗医师(J.O.M.)决定。视力恶化或黄斑水肿恶化是需要额外治疗的指征。采用频率和百分比进行统计分析。在医疗记录中记录基线和治疗结束时(平均5年)的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。主要结局指标为BCVA、20/40以上BCVA患者、20/200以下BCVA患者和稳定BCVA患者。结果:抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗是二甲醚的一线治疗方法,但现实世界的数据表明,糖尿病患者不能像大型临床试验那样每月注射。在我们的研究中,平均5次激光和5.5次注射后,90%的眼睛BCVA稳定或更好,65%≥20/40,只有13%≤20/200。结论:激光治疗DME仍是一种重要的辅助治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Role of Focal Laser in the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Era.

The Role of Focal Laser in the Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Era.

Introduction: To review important studies examining focal laser for diabetic macular edema (DME), to examine real-world data regarding actual treatments patients are receiving, to present long-term visual outcomes in real-world practice, and to suggest an evidence-based approach for the use of focal laser.

Methods: This study is a review of landmark studies evaluating focal laser and pharmacologic therapy for DME. In addition, the authors include a retrospective review of 102 consecutive eyes of 53 patients in our practice setting in rural Alabama. A chart review was performed, and patients were included if they were diagnosed with DME and were treated with both focal laser and bevacizumab. Bevacizumab and focal laser were given on a "as needed basis" at the discretion of one treating physician (J.O.M.). Worse visual acuity or worsening macular edema were indications for additional treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using frequencies and percentages. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded at baseline and at the end of treatment (mean of 5 years) in the medical record. Primary outcome measures were BCVA, patients with better than 20/40 BCVA, patients with worse than 20/200 BCVA, and patients with stable BCVA.

Results: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies are the first-line treatment for DME, but real-world claims data suggest that diabetic patients cannot come in for monthly injections as in large clinical trials. In our series, after a mean of 5 lasers and 5.5 injections, 90% of eyes had stable or better BCVA, 65% were ≥20/40, and only 13% were ≤20/200.

Conclusions: Laser treatment for DME remains an important adjunctive therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信