表面处理对牙釉质表面粗糙度的影响。

Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry Pub Date : 2016-01-12 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.17096/jiufd.02142
Seyda Ersahan, Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu
{"title":"表面处理对牙釉质表面粗糙度的影响。","authors":"Seyda Ersahan,&nbsp;Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu","doi":"10.17096/jiufd.02142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of different methods of surface treatment on enamel roughness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to type of enamel surface treatment: I, acid etching; II, Er:YAG laser; III, Nd:YAG laser. The surface roughness of enamel was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each enamel sample, two readings were taken across the sample-before enamel surface treatment (T1) and after enamel surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using a Paired sample t test and the post-hoc Mann- Whitney U test, with the significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest Ra (average roughness) values were observed for Group II, with a significant difference with Groups I and III (P<0.001). Ra values for the acid etching group (Group I) were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface treatment of enamel with Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser results in significantly higher Ra than acid-etching. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.</p>","PeriodicalId":30947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","volume":"50 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17096/jiufd.02142","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.\",\"authors\":\"Seyda Ersahan,&nbsp;Fidan Alakus Sabuncuoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.17096/jiufd.02142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effects of different methods of surface treatment on enamel roughness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to type of enamel surface treatment: I, acid etching; II, Er:YAG laser; III, Nd:YAG laser. The surface roughness of enamel was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each enamel sample, two readings were taken across the sample-before enamel surface treatment (T1) and after enamel surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using a Paired sample t test and the post-hoc Mann- Whitney U test, with the significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest Ra (average roughness) values were observed for Group II, with a significant difference with Groups I and III (P<0.001). Ra values for the acid etching group (Group I) were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface treatment of enamel with Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser results in significantly higher Ra than acid-etching. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17096/jiufd.02142\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.02142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.02142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:比较不同表面处理方法对牙釉质粗糙度的影响。材料与方法:90颗人上颌第一前磨牙按牙釉质表面处理方式随机分为3组(n=30): 1、酸蚀组;二、Er:YAG激光器;三、Nd:YAG激光器。采用非接触式光学轮廓仪测量牙釉质表面粗糙度。对于每个牙釉质样品,在牙釉质表面处理前(T1)和牙釉质表面处理后(T2)对样品进行两次读数。分析的粗糙度参数为平均粗糙度(Ra)。统计学分析采用配对样本t检验和事后Mann- Whitney U检验,显著性水平设为0.05。结果:ⅱ组Ra(平均粗糙度)值最高,与ⅰ组和ⅲ组差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:Er:YAG激光和Nd:YAG激光表面处理的Ra明显高于酸蚀。Er:YAG激光或Nd:YAG激光都可以推荐作为酸蚀刻的可行治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Effect of surface treatment on enamel surface roughness.

Purpose: To compare the effects of different methods of surface treatment on enamel roughness.

Materials and methods: Ninety human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into three groups (n=30) according to type of enamel surface treatment: I, acid etching; II, Er:YAG laser; III, Nd:YAG laser. The surface roughness of enamel was measured with a noncontact optical profilometer. For each enamel sample, two readings were taken across the sample-before enamel surface treatment (T1) and after enamel surface treatment (T2). The roughness parameter analyzed was the average roughness (Ra). Statistical analysis was performed using a Paired sample t test and the post-hoc Mann- Whitney U test, with the significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The highest Ra (average roughness) values were observed for Group II, with a significant difference with Groups I and III (P<0.001). Ra values for the acid etching group (Group I) were significantly lower than other groups (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Surface treatment of enamel with Er:YAG laser and Nd:YAG laser results in significantly higher Ra than acid-etching. Both Er:YAG laser or Nd:YAG laser can be recommended as viable treatment alternatives to acid etching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信