确定初级保健保健结果指标。系统综述的综述

A. Olry de Labry Lima , L. García Mochón , C. Bermúdez Tamayo
{"title":"确定初级保健保健结果指标。系统综述的综述","authors":"A. Olry de Labry Lima ,&nbsp;L. García Mochón ,&nbsp;C. Bermúdez Tamayo","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2017.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Outcome measures are being widely used by health services to assess the quality of health care. It is important to have a battery of useful performance indicators with high validity and feasibility. Thus, the objective of this study is to perform a review of reviews in order to identify outcome indicators for use in Primary Care.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) was carried out. The following databases were consulted: MedLine, EMBASE, and CINAHL, using descriptors and free terms, limiting searches to documents published in English or Spanish. In addition, a search was made for free terms in different web pages. Those reviews that offered indicators that could be used in the Primary Care environment were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This review included a total of 5 reviews on performance indicators in Primary Care, which consisted of indicators in the following areas or clinical care processes: in osteoarthritis, chronicity, childhood asthma, clinical effectiveness, and prescription safety indicators. A total of 69 performance indicators were identified, with the percentage of performance indicators ranging from 0% to 92.8%. None of the reviews identified performed an analysis of the measurement control (feasibility or sensitivity to change of indicators).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper offers a set of 69 performance indicators that have been identified and subsequently validated and prioritised by a panel of experts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"32 5","pages":"Pages 278-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.08.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identificación de indicadores de resultado en salud en atención primaria. Una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas\",\"authors\":\"A. Olry de Labry Lima ,&nbsp;L. García Mochón ,&nbsp;C. Bermúdez Tamayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2017.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Outcome measures are being widely used by health services to assess the quality of health care. It is important to have a battery of useful performance indicators with high validity and feasibility. Thus, the objective of this study is to perform a review of reviews in order to identify outcome indicators for use in Primary Care.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) was carried out. The following databases were consulted: MedLine, EMBASE, and CINAHL, using descriptors and free terms, limiting searches to documents published in English or Spanish. In addition, a search was made for free terms in different web pages. Those reviews that offered indicators that could be used in the Primary Care environment were included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This review included a total of 5 reviews on performance indicators in Primary Care, which consisted of indicators in the following areas or clinical care processes: in osteoarthritis, chronicity, childhood asthma, clinical effectiveness, and prescription safety indicators. A total of 69 performance indicators were identified, with the percentage of performance indicators ranging from 0% to 92.8%. None of the reviews identified performed an analysis of the measurement control (feasibility or sensitivity to change of indicators).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper offers a set of 69 performance indicators that have been identified and subsequently validated and prioritised by a panel of experts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 278-288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2017.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X17300544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

卫生服务机构正在广泛使用结果指标来评估卫生保健的质量。重要的是要有一组有用的、高有效性和可行性的性能指标。因此,本研究的目的是进行综述,以确定用于初级保健的结果指标。方法对系统评价(总括性评价)进行综述。参考了以下数据库:MedLine、EMBASE和CINAHL,使用描述符和自由术语,将搜索限制在以英语或西班牙语发表的文档。此外,还在不同的网页上搜索免费术语。那些提供可用于初级保健环境的指标的评价被包括在内。结果本综述共纳入5篇关于初级保健绩效指标的综述,包括以下领域或临床护理过程的指标:骨关节炎、慢性、儿童哮喘、临床有效性和处方安全性指标。共确定了69个绩效指标,绩效指标占比从0%到92.8%不等。所有已确定的评价均未对测量控制(对指标变化的可行性或敏感性)进行分析。本文提供了一套69个绩效指标,这些指标已被确定并随后由专家小组验证和确定优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identificación de indicadores de resultado en salud en atención primaria. Una revisión de revisiones sistemáticas

Introduction

Outcome measures are being widely used by health services to assess the quality of health care. It is important to have a battery of useful performance indicators with high validity and feasibility. Thus, the objective of this study is to perform a review of reviews in order to identify outcome indicators for use in Primary Care.

Methodology

A review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) was carried out. The following databases were consulted: MedLine, EMBASE, and CINAHL, using descriptors and free terms, limiting searches to documents published in English or Spanish. In addition, a search was made for free terms in different web pages. Those reviews that offered indicators that could be used in the Primary Care environment were included.

Results

This review included a total of 5 reviews on performance indicators in Primary Care, which consisted of indicators in the following areas or clinical care processes: in osteoarthritis, chronicity, childhood asthma, clinical effectiveness, and prescription safety indicators. A total of 69 performance indicators were identified, with the percentage of performance indicators ranging from 0% to 92.8%. None of the reviews identified performed an analysis of the measurement control (feasibility or sensitivity to change of indicators).

Conclusions

This paper offers a set of 69 performance indicators that have been identified and subsequently validated and prioritised by a panel of experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信