“两者都爱”:全球化世界中的堕胎。

Medicina nei secoli Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Susanna Mancini
{"title":"“两者都爱”:全球化世界中的堕胎。","authors":"Susanna Mancini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the origins and the development of women-protective anti-abortion arguments in a globalized world. Unlike fetus-base pro- life arguments, women protective ones focus on gender stereotypes and on the theory of gender complementarity. The article traces the influence of US conservative groups in spreading such arguments beyond the US borders, so that in today's globalized world, womnen-protective arguments have become central in abortion and contraception related legislation and litigation in the US, Europe and Russia. The article points to the dangers of the women-protective anti-abortion strategy, which aims at disempowering women, by denying them agency and control over reproduction, resulting in a direct challenge to gender equality.</p>","PeriodicalId":76143,"journal":{"name":"Medicina nei secoli","volume":"28 1","pages":"123-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[['Love them Both': Abortion in a Globalized World].]\",\"authors\":\"Susanna Mancini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article explores the origins and the development of women-protective anti-abortion arguments in a globalized world. Unlike fetus-base pro- life arguments, women protective ones focus on gender stereotypes and on the theory of gender complementarity. The article traces the influence of US conservative groups in spreading such arguments beyond the US borders, so that in today's globalized world, womnen-protective arguments have become central in abortion and contraception related legislation and litigation in the US, Europe and Russia. The article points to the dangers of the women-protective anti-abortion strategy, which aims at disempowering women, by denying them agency and control over reproduction, resulting in a direct challenge to gender equality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina nei secoli\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"123-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina nei secoli\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina nei secoli","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在全球化的世界中保护妇女的反堕胎论点的起源和发展。与以胎儿为基础的反堕胎论点不同,保护妇女的论点侧重于性别刻板印象和性别互补理论。文章追溯了美国保守派团体将这一论点传播到美国境外的影响,以至于在全球化的今天,美国、欧洲和俄罗斯的堕胎和避孕相关立法和诉讼中,保护妇女的论点已经成为核心。这篇文章指出了保护妇女的反堕胎战略的危险,该战略旨在剥夺妇女的权力,剥夺她们对生育的代理权和控制权,从而直接挑战性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[['Love them Both': Abortion in a Globalized World].]

This article explores the origins and the development of women-protective anti-abortion arguments in a globalized world. Unlike fetus-base pro- life arguments, women protective ones focus on gender stereotypes and on the theory of gender complementarity. The article traces the influence of US conservative groups in spreading such arguments beyond the US borders, so that in today's globalized world, womnen-protective arguments have become central in abortion and contraception related legislation and litigation in the US, Europe and Russia. The article points to the dangers of the women-protective anti-abortion strategy, which aims at disempowering women, by denying them agency and control over reproduction, resulting in a direct challenge to gender equality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信