给无声者发声:科罗拉多州对无代表病人的回应。

Q3 Medicine

Journal of Clinical Ethics Pub Date : 2017-01-01

Deb Bennett-Woods, Jean Abbott, Jacqueline J Glover

{"title":"给无声者发声:科罗拉多州对无代表病人的回应。","authors":"Deb Bennett-Woods, Jean Abbott, Jacqueline J Glover","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical decision making on behalf of unrepresented patients is one of the most challenging ethical issues faced in clinical practice. The legal environment surrounding these patients is equally complex. This article describes the efforts of a small coalition of interested healthcare professionals to address the issue in Colorado. A brief history of the effort is presented, along with discussion of the legal, ethical, practical, and political dimensions that arose in Colorado's effort to address decision making for unrepresented patients through an extension of the existing Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act (CRS 15-18). A discussion of lessons learned in the process is included.","PeriodicalId":39646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"204-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giving Voice to the Voiceless: The Colorado Response to Unrepresented Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Deb Bennett-Woods, Jean Abbott, Jacqueline J Glover\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical decision making on behalf of unrepresented patients is one of the most challenging ethical issues faced in clinical practice. The legal environment surrounding these patients is equally complex. This article describes the efforts of a small coalition of interested healthcare professionals to address the issue in Colorado. A brief history of the effort is presented, along with discussion of the legal, ethical, practical, and political dimensions that arose in Colorado's effort to address decision making for unrepresented patients through an extension of the existing Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act (CRS 15-18). A discussion of lessons learned in the process is included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"204-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

代表无代表患者的医疗决策是临床实践中面临的最具挑战性的伦理问题之一。围绕这些患者的法律环境同样复杂。本文描述了一个由感兴趣的医疗保健专业人员组成的小联盟在科罗拉多州为解决这一问题所做的努力。本文简要介绍了这项工作的历史，并讨论了科罗拉多州通过延长现有的《科罗拉多州医疗决策法》(CRS 15-18)来解决无代表患者的决策问题所产生的法律、伦理、实践和政治方面的问题。讨论了在此过程中吸取的经验教训。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Giving Voice to the Voiceless: The Colorado Response to Unrepresented Patients.

Medical decision making on behalf of unrepresented patients is one of the most challenging ethical issues faced in clinical practice. The legal environment surrounding these patients is equally complex. This article describes the efforts of a small coalition of interested healthcare professionals to address the issue in Colorado. A brief history of the effort is presented, along with discussion of the legal, ethical, practical, and political dimensions that arose in Colorado's effort to address decision making for unrepresented patients through an extension of the existing Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act (CRS 15-18). A discussion of lessons learned in the process is included.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Clinical Ethics Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Clinical Ethics is written for and by physicians, nurses, attorneys, clergy, ethicists, and others whose decisions directly affect patients. More than 70 percent of the articles are authored or co-authored by physicians. JCE is a double-blinded, peer-reviewed journal indexed in PubMed, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, the Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and other indexes.