牙列旁指数与正畸保持器之间的相关性:对一组 16 名患者进行的前瞻性研究。

ORAL and Implantology Pub Date : 2017-04-10 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078
D DI Venere, F Pettini, G M Nardi, A Laforgia, G Stefanachi, V Notaro, B Rapone, F R Grassi, M Corsalini
{"title":"牙列旁指数与正畸保持器之间的相关性:对一组 16 名患者进行的前瞻性研究。","authors":"D DI Venere, F Pettini, G M Nardi, A Laforgia, G Stefanachi, V Notaro, B Rapone, F R Grassi, M Corsalini","doi":"10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fixed retainers are used to stabilize dental elements after orthodontic treatment. Being it a permanent treatment, it is necessary to instruct patients about a constant and continuous monitoring of their periodontal conditions and a correct oral hygiene. The aim of this study was to highlight the possible adverse effects of bonded retainers on parameters correlated to the health conditions of periodontal tissues.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We selected 16 patients, under treatment in the Orthodontics Department of University of Bari Dental School, who had undergone a lingual retainer insertion at the end of the orthodontic treatment. The patients were then divided into two groups (Control Group and Study Group) and monitored for 3 and 36 months, respectively. The following indexes were taken into consideration: gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and the presence of calculus (Calculus Index, CI), the probing depth and the presence of gingival recession on the six inferior frontal dental elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the observation was carried out, any of the patients showed periodontal sockets and gingival recession. In the Study Group, only 1 patient had a PI score=3, the 7 left had scores between 0.66 and 2.83. In the Control Group, one patient had score=0, the other ones showed values between 0.5 and 1.66. The mean GI in the Study Group peaked at a score of 2.83, the minimum was 0.66; whereas in the Control Group the maximum value was 2 and the minimum 0.66. The CI in the Group Study was between 1 and 2. In the Control Group it was absent in only 1 patient, whereas in the remaining 7, it had a value between 0.3 and 1. The clinical data were studied by means of the Wilcoxon test. We found a statistically significant difference for what concerns the Plaque Indexes (PI) (P>0.05) and Calculus Indexes (CI) (P>0.1) in both groups, with higher scores in the Study Group, having retainers for 36 months. Any statistically significant difference was calculated for the GI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We can therefore conclude that patients with lingual retainers need periodontal hygiene and treatment as to prevent, in the course of time, periodontal damages non-detectable in short-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"10 1","pages":"78-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516425/pdf/78-86.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between parodontal indexes and orthodontic retainers: prospective study in a group of 16 patients.\",\"authors\":\"D DI Venere, F Pettini, G M Nardi, A Laforgia, G Stefanachi, V Notaro, B Rapone, F R Grassi, M Corsalini\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fixed retainers are used to stabilize dental elements after orthodontic treatment. Being it a permanent treatment, it is necessary to instruct patients about a constant and continuous monitoring of their periodontal conditions and a correct oral hygiene. The aim of this study was to highlight the possible adverse effects of bonded retainers on parameters correlated to the health conditions of periodontal tissues.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We selected 16 patients, under treatment in the Orthodontics Department of University of Bari Dental School, who had undergone a lingual retainer insertion at the end of the orthodontic treatment. The patients were then divided into two groups (Control Group and Study Group) and monitored for 3 and 36 months, respectively. The following indexes were taken into consideration: gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and the presence of calculus (Calculus Index, CI), the probing depth and the presence of gingival recession on the six inferior frontal dental elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the observation was carried out, any of the patients showed periodontal sockets and gingival recession. In the Study Group, only 1 patient had a PI score=3, the 7 left had scores between 0.66 and 2.83. In the Control Group, one patient had score=0, the other ones showed values between 0.5 and 1.66. The mean GI in the Study Group peaked at a score of 2.83, the minimum was 0.66; whereas in the Control Group the maximum value was 2 and the minimum 0.66. The CI in the Group Study was between 1 and 2. In the Control Group it was absent in only 1 patient, whereas in the remaining 7, it had a value between 0.3 and 1. The clinical data were studied by means of the Wilcoxon test. We found a statistically significant difference for what concerns the Plaque Indexes (PI) (P>0.05) and Calculus Indexes (CI) (P>0.1) in both groups, with higher scores in the Study Group, having retainers for 36 months. Any statistically significant difference was calculated for the GI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We can therefore conclude that patients with lingual retainers need periodontal hygiene and treatment as to prevent, in the course of time, periodontal damages non-detectable in short-term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"78-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516425/pdf/78-86.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORAL and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2017.10.1.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:固定保持器用于在正畸治疗后稳定牙齿。由于它是一种永久性治疗,因此有必要指导患者持续不断地监测牙周状况和正确的口腔卫生。本研究旨在强调粘结保持器对牙周组织健康状况相关参数可能产生的不良影响:我们选择了 16 名在巴里大学牙科学院正畸科接受治疗的患者,他们在正畸治疗结束时都安装了舌侧保持器。这些患者被分为两组(对照组和研究组),分别接受 3 个月和 36 个月的监测。观察指标包括:牙龈指数(GI)、牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙结石指数(CI)、探诊深度和六个下前牙体的牙龈退缩情况:观察后,所有患者均出现牙周袋和牙龈退缩。在研究组中,只有 1 名患者的 PI 值为 3,其余 7 名患者的 PI 值在 0.66 至 2.83 之间。对照组中,一名患者的 PI 值为 0,其他患者的 PI 值在 0.5 至 1.66 之间。研究组的平均胃肠道指数最高值为 2.83,最低值为 0.66;而对照组的最高值为 2,最低值为 0.66。研究组的 CI 值介于 1 和 2 之间。在对照组中,只有 1 名患者没有 CI 值,而其余 7 名患者的 CI 值在 0.3 和 1 之间。我们发现,两组患者在牙菌斑指数(PI)(P>0.05)和结石指数(CI)(P>0.1)方面存在明显的统计学差异,其中研究组患者的得分更高,因为他们佩戴了 36 个月的保持器。结论:因此,我们可以得出结论,使用舌侧保持器的患者需要进行牙周卫生和治疗,以防止牙周损伤在短期内难以察觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between parodontal indexes and orthodontic retainers: prospective study in a group of 16 patients.

Purpose: Fixed retainers are used to stabilize dental elements after orthodontic treatment. Being it a permanent treatment, it is necessary to instruct patients about a constant and continuous monitoring of their periodontal conditions and a correct oral hygiene. The aim of this study was to highlight the possible adverse effects of bonded retainers on parameters correlated to the health conditions of periodontal tissues.

Materials and methods: We selected 16 patients, under treatment in the Orthodontics Department of University of Bari Dental School, who had undergone a lingual retainer insertion at the end of the orthodontic treatment. The patients were then divided into two groups (Control Group and Study Group) and monitored for 3 and 36 months, respectively. The following indexes were taken into consideration: gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI) and the presence of calculus (Calculus Index, CI), the probing depth and the presence of gingival recession on the six inferior frontal dental elements.

Results: After the observation was carried out, any of the patients showed periodontal sockets and gingival recession. In the Study Group, only 1 patient had a PI score=3, the 7 left had scores between 0.66 and 2.83. In the Control Group, one patient had score=0, the other ones showed values between 0.5 and 1.66. The mean GI in the Study Group peaked at a score of 2.83, the minimum was 0.66; whereas in the Control Group the maximum value was 2 and the minimum 0.66. The CI in the Group Study was between 1 and 2. In the Control Group it was absent in only 1 patient, whereas in the remaining 7, it had a value between 0.3 and 1. The clinical data were studied by means of the Wilcoxon test. We found a statistically significant difference for what concerns the Plaque Indexes (PI) (P>0.05) and Calculus Indexes (CI) (P>0.1) in both groups, with higher scores in the Study Group, having retainers for 36 months. Any statistically significant difference was calculated for the GI.

Conclusions: We can therefore conclude that patients with lingual retainers need periodontal hygiene and treatment as to prevent, in the course of time, periodontal damages non-detectable in short-term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信