用于评估轻度认知障碍风险的手指敲击测试。

Shota Suzumura, Aiko Osawa, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Maeda Keisuke, Eiko Takano, Junpei Sugioka, Maeda Natsumi, Taishi Nagahama, Kenta Shiramoto, Katsumi Kuno, Shiori Kizuka, Kenji Satoh, Hiroaki Sakurai, Yuko Sano, Tomohiko Mizuguchi, Akihiko Kandori, Izumi Kondo
{"title":"用于评估轻度认知障碍风险的手指敲击测试。","authors":"Shota Suzumura, Aiko Osawa, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Maeda Keisuke, Eiko Takano, Junpei Sugioka, Maeda Natsumi, Taishi Nagahama, Kenta Shiramoto, Katsumi Kuno, Shiori Kizuka, Kenji Satoh, Hiroaki Sakurai, Yuko Sano, Tomohiko Mizuguchi, Akihiko Kandori, Izumi Kondo","doi":"10.1177/15691861221109872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>A testing method for early diagnosis of Mild cognitive dementia (MCI) that can be easily applied in clinical practice was investigated in this study. We examined whether MCI risk can be determined through finger movements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2013 and 2020, 1097 individuals were screened. After applying propensity-score matching to adjust for variability between the groups, 173 individuals each in the mild cognitive impairment and control groups were selected. Thereafter, differences between groups in mean values of parameters extracted from finger tap movements were determined using unpaired t-test and effect size. Furthermore, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve for parameters with significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed, especially in the number of taps in the MCI group compared with that in the control group (<i>p</i> < .001; 95% CI, -12.7 to -8.8; <i>r</i> = 0.51). A cut-off value of 30 taps was applied (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.67; AUC, 0.79). Significant differences were also observed in rhythm-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These parameters might be useful for capturing MCI risk. Finger taps are easily measured and may be suitable for screening large populations. This tool might be used as a supplemental method to increase the sensitivity of traditional cognitive tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":73249,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","volume":"35 2","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/1f/10.1177_15691861221109872.PMC9716461.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finger Tapping Test for Assessing the Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Shota Suzumura, Aiko Osawa, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Maeda Keisuke, Eiko Takano, Junpei Sugioka, Maeda Natsumi, Taishi Nagahama, Kenta Shiramoto, Katsumi Kuno, Shiori Kizuka, Kenji Satoh, Hiroaki Sakurai, Yuko Sano, Tomohiko Mizuguchi, Akihiko Kandori, Izumi Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15691861221109872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>A testing method for early diagnosis of Mild cognitive dementia (MCI) that can be easily applied in clinical practice was investigated in this study. We examined whether MCI risk can be determined through finger movements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2013 and 2020, 1097 individuals were screened. After applying propensity-score matching to adjust for variability between the groups, 173 individuals each in the mild cognitive impairment and control groups were selected. Thereafter, differences between groups in mean values of parameters extracted from finger tap movements were determined using unpaired t-test and effect size. Furthermore, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve for parameters with significant difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was observed, especially in the number of taps in the MCI group compared with that in the control group (<i>p</i> < .001; 95% CI, -12.7 to -8.8; <i>r</i> = 0.51). A cut-off value of 30 taps was applied (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.67; AUC, 0.79). Significant differences were also observed in rhythm-related parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These parameters might be useful for capturing MCI risk. Finger taps are easily measured and may be suitable for screening large populations. This tool might be used as a supplemental method to increase the sensitivity of traditional cognitive tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"137-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/1f/10.1177_15691861221109872.PMC9716461.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861221109872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861221109872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了一种易于应用于临床实践的早期诊断轻度认知痴呆(MCI)的测试方法。我们研究了是否可以通过手指运动来确定 MCI 风险:方法:2013 年至 2020 年间,我们对 1097 人进行了筛查。采用倾向分数匹配法调整组间差异后,轻度认知障碍组和对照组各选出 173 人。随后,采用非配对 t 检验和效应大小法确定了各组间从手指敲击运动中提取的参数平均值的差异。此外,还根据接收者操作特征曲线计算了有显著差异的参数的曲线下面积、灵敏度和特异性:与对照组相比,MCI 组的拍击次数有明显差异(P < .001;95% CI,-12.7 至 -8.8;r = 0.51)。以 30 次为临界值(灵敏度为 0.77;特异性为 0.67;AUC 为 0.79)。在节律相关参数中也观察到了显著差异:这些参数可能有助于捕捉 MCI 风险。手指敲击法易于测量,可能适用于大量人群的筛查。该工具可作为一种补充方法,提高传统认知测试的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Finger Tapping Test for Assessing the Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Finger Tapping Test for Assessing the Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Finger Tapping Test for Assessing the Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Finger Tapping Test for Assessing the Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Aim: A testing method for early diagnosis of Mild cognitive dementia (MCI) that can be easily applied in clinical practice was investigated in this study. We examined whether MCI risk can be determined through finger movements.

Methods: Between 2013 and 2020, 1097 individuals were screened. After applying propensity-score matching to adjust for variability between the groups, 173 individuals each in the mild cognitive impairment and control groups were selected. Thereafter, differences between groups in mean values of parameters extracted from finger tap movements were determined using unpaired t-test and effect size. Furthermore, area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curve for parameters with significant difference.

Results: A significant difference was observed, especially in the number of taps in the MCI group compared with that in the control group (p < .001; 95% CI, -12.7 to -8.8; r = 0.51). A cut-off value of 30 taps was applied (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.67; AUC, 0.79). Significant differences were also observed in rhythm-related parameters.

Conclusions: These parameters might be useful for capturing MCI risk. Finger taps are easily measured and may be suitable for screening large populations. This tool might be used as a supplemental method to increase the sensitivity of traditional cognitive tests.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信