鉴别女性类风湿关节炎患者肥胖的体质指数的最佳临界值是哪一个?双能x射线吸收仪对人体成分的研究

Maria Fernanda B. Resende Guimarães , Maria Raquel da Costa Pinto , Renata G. Santos Couto Raid , Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade , Adriana Maria Kakehasi
{"title":"鉴别女性类风湿关节炎患者肥胖的体质指数的最佳临界值是哪一个?双能x射线吸收仪对人体成分的研究","authors":"Maria Fernanda B. Resende Guimarães ,&nbsp;Maria Raquel da Costa Pinto ,&nbsp;Renata G. Santos Couto Raid ,&nbsp;Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade ,&nbsp;Adriana Maria Kakehasi","doi":"10.1016/j.rbre.2016.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Standard anthropometric measures used to diagnose obesity in the general population may not have the same performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine cutoff points for body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) for detecting obesity in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing these standard anthropometric measures to a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based obesity criterion.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>Adult female patients with more than six months of diagnosis of RA underwent clinical evaluation, with anthropometric measures and body composition with DXA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty two patients were included, mean age 55<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.7 years. The diagnosis of obesity in the sample was about 31.7% by BMI, 86.6% by WC and 59.8% by DXA. Considering DXA as golden standard, cutoff points were identified for anthropometric measures to better approximate DXA estimates of percent body fat: for BMI value<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->25<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> was the best for definition of obesity in female patients with RA, with sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 60%. For WC, with 80% of sensitivity and 35% of specificity, the best value to detect obesity was 86<!--> <!-->cm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A large percentage of patients were obese. The traditional cutoff points used for obesity were not suitable for our sample. For this female population with established RA, BMI cutoff point of 25<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> and WC cutoff point of 86<!--> <!-->cm were the most appropriate to detect obesity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)","volume":"57 4","pages":"Pages 279-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.02.008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which is the best cutoff of body mass index to identify obesity in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A study using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition\",\"authors\":\"Maria Fernanda B. Resende Guimarães ,&nbsp;Maria Raquel da Costa Pinto ,&nbsp;Renata G. Santos Couto Raid ,&nbsp;Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade ,&nbsp;Adriana Maria Kakehasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbre.2016.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Standard anthropometric measures used to diagnose obesity in the general population may not have the same performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine cutoff points for body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) for detecting obesity in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing these standard anthropometric measures to a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based obesity criterion.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and method</h3><p>Adult female patients with more than six months of diagnosis of RA underwent clinical evaluation, with anthropometric measures and body composition with DXA.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty two patients were included, mean age 55<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.7 years. The diagnosis of obesity in the sample was about 31.7% by BMI, 86.6% by WC and 59.8% by DXA. Considering DXA as golden standard, cutoff points were identified for anthropometric measures to better approximate DXA estimates of percent body fat: for BMI value<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->25<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> was the best for definition of obesity in female patients with RA, with sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 60%. For WC, with 80% of sensitivity and 35% of specificity, the best value to detect obesity was 86<!--> <!-->cm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A large percentage of patients were obese. The traditional cutoff points used for obesity were not suitable for our sample. For this female population with established RA, BMI cutoff point of 25<!--> <!-->kg/m<sup>2</sup> and WC cutoff point of 86<!--> <!-->cm were the most appropriate to detect obesity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 279-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbre.2016.02.008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255502116000274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255502116000274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

用于诊断普通人群肥胖的标准人体测量测量可能在类风湿关节炎患者中没有相同的表现。目的通过比较标准人体测量指标和基于双能x线吸收测量(DXA)的肥胖标准,确定检测类风湿关节炎(RA)女性肥胖的体质指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)的截止点。患者和方法诊断为RA超过6个月的成年女性患者进行临床评估,使用DXA进行人体测量和身体成分。结果纳入患者82例,平均年龄55±10.7岁。BMI、WC和DXA的肥胖诊断率分别为31.7%、86.6%和59.8%。考虑到DXA作为金标准,我们确定了人体测量的截止点,以更好地近似DXA对体脂百分比的估计:BMI值≥25 kg/m2是女性RA患者肥胖定义的最佳值,敏感性为80%,特异性为60%。对于WC,敏感性为80%,特异性为35%,检测肥胖的最佳值为86 cm。结论肥胖患者比例较高。传统的肥胖分界点不适合我们的样本。对于已确诊RA的女性人群,BMI截断点为25 kg/m2, WC截断点为86 cm是最适合检测肥胖的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which is the best cutoff of body mass index to identify obesity in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A study using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition

Introduction

Standard anthropometric measures used to diagnose obesity in the general population may not have the same performance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Objective

To determine cutoff points for body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) for detecting obesity in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing these standard anthropometric measures to a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based obesity criterion.

Patients and method

Adult female patients with more than six months of diagnosis of RA underwent clinical evaluation, with anthropometric measures and body composition with DXA.

Results

Eighty two patients were included, mean age 55 ± 10.7 years. The diagnosis of obesity in the sample was about 31.7% by BMI, 86.6% by WC and 59.8% by DXA. Considering DXA as golden standard, cutoff points were identified for anthropometric measures to better approximate DXA estimates of percent body fat: for BMI value  25 kg/m2 was the best for definition of obesity in female patients with RA, with sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 60%. For WC, with 80% of sensitivity and 35% of specificity, the best value to detect obesity was 86 cm.

Conclusion

A large percentage of patients were obese. The traditional cutoff points used for obesity were not suitable for our sample. For this female population with established RA, BMI cutoff point of 25 kg/m2 and WC cutoff point of 86 cm were the most appropriate to detect obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信