社会工作实践的国家定义:对我们职业认同的启示。

Katharine Hill, Sondra Fogel, Linda Plitt Donaldson, Christina Erickson
{"title":"社会工作实践的国家定义:对我们职业认同的启示。","authors":"Katharine Hill,&nbsp;Sondra Fogel,&nbsp;Linda Plitt Donaldson,&nbsp;Christina Erickson","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For over a century, the social work profession has been concerned with describing the unique and specific characteristics that define its core functions in society; however, the profession has yet to agree to a single definition of social work. In the absence of a unifying definition, 51 different statutory definitions of social work have been created by each state and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using qualitative methods, each statutory definition of social work was analyzed to gain an understanding of how social work is defined and understood across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that 57% of the statutory language blend the full range of micro to macro social work practice skills into their definition. However, even within these and those remaining, there are vast differences in definitions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implications for state licensing laws, are considered, along with how this impacts education, the work force, and professional identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"14 4","pages":"266-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Definitions of Social Work Practice: Implications for our Professional Identity.\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Hill,&nbsp;Sondra Fogel,&nbsp;Linda Plitt Donaldson,&nbsp;Christina Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For over a century, the social work profession has been concerned with describing the unique and specific characteristics that define its core functions in society; however, the profession has yet to agree to a single definition of social work. In the absence of a unifying definition, 51 different statutory definitions of social work have been created by each state and the District of Columbia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using qualitative methods, each statutory definition of social work was analyzed to gain an understanding of how social work is defined and understood across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that 57% of the statutory language blend the full range of micro to macro social work practice skills into their definition. However, even within these and those remaining, there are vast differences in definitions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implications for state licensing laws, are considered, along with how this impacts education, the work force, and professional identity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"266-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-informed social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1319775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:一个多世纪以来,社会工作专业一直关注描述定义其在社会中的核心功能的独特和具体特征;然而,该行业尚未就社会工作的单一定义达成一致。在缺乏统一定义的情况下,每个州和哥伦比亚特区制定了51个不同的社会工作法定定义。方法:采用定性方法,分析社会工作的每个法定定义,以了解如何在美国定义和理解社会工作。结果:调查结果表明,57%的法定语言将微观到宏观的社会工作实践技能融入其定义中。然而,即使在这些和那些剩下的,在定义上也有巨大的差异。讨论:考虑了对州执照法的影响,以及这对教育、劳动力和职业身份的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State Definitions of Social Work Practice: Implications for our Professional Identity.

Purpose: For over a century, the social work profession has been concerned with describing the unique and specific characteristics that define its core functions in society; however, the profession has yet to agree to a single definition of social work. In the absence of a unifying definition, 51 different statutory definitions of social work have been created by each state and the District of Columbia.

Methods: Using qualitative methods, each statutory definition of social work was analyzed to gain an understanding of how social work is defined and understood across the United States.

Results: Findings indicate that 57% of the statutory language blend the full range of micro to macro social work practice skills into their definition. However, even within these and those remaining, there are vast differences in definitions.

Discussion: Implications for state licensing laws, are considered, along with how this impacts education, the work force, and professional identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信