线性回归分析中的两个悖论。

Ge Feng, Jing Peng, Dongke Tu, Julia Z Zheng, Changyong Feng
{"title":"线性回归分析中的两个悖论。","authors":"Ge Feng,&nbsp;Jing Peng,&nbsp;Dongke Tu,&nbsp;Julia Z Zheng,&nbsp;Changyong Feng","doi":"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regression is one of the favorite tools in applied statistics. However, misuse and misinterpretation of results from regression analysis are common in biomedical research. In this paper we use statistical theory and simulation studies to clarify some paradoxes around this popular statistical method. In particular, we show that a widely used model selection procedure employed in many publications in top medical journals is wrong. Formal procedures based on solid statistical theory should be used in model selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21886,"journal":{"name":"上海精神医学","volume":"28 6","pages":"355-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/2d/sap-28-355.PMC5434296.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ge Feng,&nbsp;Jing Peng,&nbsp;Dongke Tu,&nbsp;Julia Z Zheng,&nbsp;Changyong Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Regression is one of the favorite tools in applied statistics. However, misuse and misinterpretation of results from regression analysis are common in biomedical research. In this paper we use statistical theory and simulation studies to clarify some paradoxes around this popular statistical method. In particular, we show that a widely used model selection procedure employed in many publications in top medical journals is wrong. Formal procedures based on solid statistical theory should be used in model selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"上海精神医学\",\"volume\":\"28 6\",\"pages\":\"355-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/2d/sap-28-355.PMC5434296.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"上海精神医学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海精神医学","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.216084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

回归是应用统计学中最受欢迎的工具之一。然而,对回归分析结果的误用和误读在生物医学研究中很常见。在本文中,我们使用统计理论和模拟研究来澄清围绕这种流行的统计方法的一些悖论。特别是,我们表明在许多顶级医学期刊出版物中广泛使用的模型选择程序是错误的。模型选择应采用基于可靠统计理论的正式程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis.

Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis.

Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis.

Two Paradoxes in Linear Regression Analysis.

Regression is one of the favorite tools in applied statistics. However, misuse and misinterpretation of results from regression analysis are common in biomedical research. In this paper we use statistical theory and simulation studies to clarify some paradoxes around this popular statistical method. In particular, we show that a widely used model selection procedure employed in many publications in top medical journals is wrong. Formal procedures based on solid statistical theory should be used in model selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2341
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信