{"title":"商业晒黑沙龙与黑色素瘤风险","authors":"David G Hoel","doi":"10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been many case-control studies of melanoma and the use of indoor tanning equipment. A recent meta analysis of 8 credible studies in North America estimated an overall significant odds ratio of 1.23. Three of these 8 studies also reported separately on commercial use and home use of indoor tanning equipment. For home use the overall odds ratio was a significant 1.53 while for commercial use there was a non significant 1.05.</p>","PeriodicalId":11115,"journal":{"name":"Dermato-Endocrinology","volume":"9 1","pages":"e1270485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial tanning salons and melanoma risk.\",\"authors\":\"David G Hoel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There have been many case-control studies of melanoma and the use of indoor tanning equipment. A recent meta analysis of 8 credible studies in North America estimated an overall significant odds ratio of 1.23. Three of these 8 studies also reported separately on commercial use and home use of indoor tanning equipment. For home use the overall odds ratio was a significant 1.53 while for commercial use there was a non significant 1.05.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermato-Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e1270485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermato-Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermato-Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19381980.2016.1270485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
There have been many case-control studies of melanoma and the use of indoor tanning equipment. A recent meta analysis of 8 credible studies in North America estimated an overall significant odds ratio of 1.23. Three of these 8 studies also reported separately on commercial use and home use of indoor tanning equipment. For home use the overall odds ratio was a significant 1.53 while for commercial use there was a non significant 1.05.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
