马德里卫生服务中初级保健医生对电子处方的看法

A.I. Villímar Rodríguez , A.B. Gangoso Fermoso , C. Calvo Pita , G. Ariza Cardiel
{"title":"马德里卫生服务中初级保健医生对电子处方的看法","authors":"A.I. Villímar Rodríguez ,&nbsp;A.B. Gangoso Fermoso ,&nbsp;C. Calvo Pita ,&nbsp;G. Ariza Cardiel","doi":"10.1016/j.cali.2016.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the opinion of Primary Care physicians regarding electronic prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive study by means of a questionnaire sent to 527 primary care physicians. Period: June 2014. The questionnaire included closed questions about interest shown, satisfaction, benefits, weaknesses, and barriers, and one open question about difficulties, all of them referred to electronic prescribing. Satisfaction was measured using 1-10 scale, and benefits, weaknesses, and barriers were evaluated by a 5-ítems Likert scale. Interest was measured using both methods. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail for on line response through Google Drive® tool. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The response rate was 47% (248/527). Interest shown was 8.7 (95% CI; 8.5-8.9) and satisfaction was 7.9 (95% CI; 7.8-8). The great majority 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents used electronic prescribing where possible. Most reported benefits were: 73.4% (95% CI; 67.8-78.9%) of respondents considered that electronic prescribing facilitated medication review, and 59.3% (95% CI; 53.1-65.4) of them felt that it reduced bureaucratic burden. Among the observed weaknesses, they highlighted the following: 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents believed specialist care physicians should also be able to use electronic prescribing. Concerning to barriers: 30.2% (95% CI; 24.5-36%) of respondents think that entering a patient into the electronic prescribing system takes too much time, and 4% (95% CI; 1.6-6.5%) of them perceived the application as difficult to use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Physicians showed a notable interest in using electronic prescribing and high satisfaction with the application performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101101,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.01.008","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percepción de los médicos de atención primaria sobre la receta electrónica en el Servicio Madrileño de Salud\",\"authors\":\"A.I. Villímar Rodríguez ,&nbsp;A.B. Gangoso Fermoso ,&nbsp;C. Calvo Pita ,&nbsp;G. Ariza Cardiel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cali.2016.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the opinion of Primary Care physicians regarding electronic prescribing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive study by means of a questionnaire sent to 527 primary care physicians. Period: June 2014. The questionnaire included closed questions about interest shown, satisfaction, benefits, weaknesses, and barriers, and one open question about difficulties, all of them referred to electronic prescribing. Satisfaction was measured using 1-10 scale, and benefits, weaknesses, and barriers were evaluated by a 5-ítems Likert scale. Interest was measured using both methods. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail for on line response through Google Drive® tool. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The response rate was 47% (248/527). Interest shown was 8.7 (95% CI; 8.5-8.9) and satisfaction was 7.9 (95% CI; 7.8-8). The great majority 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents used electronic prescribing where possible. Most reported benefits were: 73.4% (95% CI; 67.8-78.9%) of respondents considered that electronic prescribing facilitated medication review, and 59.3% (95% CI; 53.1-65.4) of them felt that it reduced bureaucratic burden. Among the observed weaknesses, they highlighted the following: 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents believed specialist care physicians should also be able to use electronic prescribing. Concerning to barriers: 30.2% (95% CI; 24.5-36%) of respondents think that entering a patient into the electronic prescribing system takes too much time, and 4% (95% CI; 1.6-6.5%) of them perceived the application as difficult to use.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Physicians showed a notable interest in using electronic prescribing and high satisfaction with the application performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 338-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cali.2016.01.008\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Calidad Asistencial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16300288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Calidad Asistencial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134282X16300288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的了解基层医师对电子处方的看法。方法采用描述性研究方法,对527名初级保健医师进行问卷调查。期间:2014年6月。问卷包括关于兴趣表现、满意度、益处、弱点和障碍的封闭式问题,以及一个关于困难的开放式问题,所有问题都涉及电子处方。满意度采用1-10量表进行测量,益处、劣势和障碍采用5-ítems李克特量表进行评估。用两种方法测量兴趣。问卷通过电子邮件发送,通过Google Drive®工具在线回答。进行描述性统计分析。结果总有效率为47%(248/527)。显示的兴趣为8.7 (95% CI;8.5-8.9),满意度为7.9 (95% CI;7.8 8)。绝大多数87.9% (95% CI;83.8% -92%)的受访者在可能的情况下使用电子处方。大多数报告的获益为:73.4% (95% CI;67.8-78.9%)的受访者认为电子处方促进了药物审查,59.3% (95% CI;53.1-65.4)的人认为减少了官僚负担。在观察到的弱点中,他们强调了以下几点:87.9% (95% CI;83.8% -92%)的受访者认为专科医生也应该能够使用电子处方。关于障碍:30.2% (95% CI;24.5-36%)的受访者认为将患者输入电子处方系统需要太多时间,4% (95% CI;1.6-6.5%)的受访者认为该应用程序难以使用。结论医师对电子处方的使用兴趣明显,对电子处方的应用效果满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percepción de los médicos de atención primaria sobre la receta electrónica en el Servicio Madrileño de Salud

Objective

To investigate the opinion of Primary Care physicians regarding electronic prescribing.

Methods

Descriptive study by means of a questionnaire sent to 527 primary care physicians. Period: June 2014. The questionnaire included closed questions about interest shown, satisfaction, benefits, weaknesses, and barriers, and one open question about difficulties, all of them referred to electronic prescribing. Satisfaction was measured using 1-10 scale, and benefits, weaknesses, and barriers were evaluated by a 5-ítems Likert scale. Interest was measured using both methods. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail for on line response through Google Drive® tool. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The response rate was 47% (248/527). Interest shown was 8.7 (95% CI; 8.5-8.9) and satisfaction was 7.9 (95% CI; 7.8-8). The great majority 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents used electronic prescribing where possible. Most reported benefits were: 73.4% (95% CI; 67.8-78.9%) of respondents considered that electronic prescribing facilitated medication review, and 59.3% (95% CI; 53.1-65.4) of them felt that it reduced bureaucratic burden. Among the observed weaknesses, they highlighted the following: 87.9% (95% CI; 83.8-92%) of respondents believed specialist care physicians should also be able to use electronic prescribing. Concerning to barriers: 30.2% (95% CI; 24.5-36%) of respondents think that entering a patient into the electronic prescribing system takes too much time, and 4% (95% CI; 1.6-6.5%) of them perceived the application as difficult to use.

Conclusions

Physicians showed a notable interest in using electronic prescribing and high satisfaction with the application performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信