圆锥角膜交联(部分深度去角质)的5年随访。

Ophthalmology and eye diseases Pub Date : 2016-05-12 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.4137/OED.S38364
Virgilio Galvis, Alejandro Tello, Néstor I Carreño, Alvaro I Ortiz, Rodrigo Barrera, Carlos Julián Rodriguez, Miguel E Ochoa
{"title":"圆锥角膜交联(部分深度去角质)的5年随访。","authors":"Virgilio Galvis,&nbsp;Alejandro Tello,&nbsp;Néstor I Carreño,&nbsp;Alvaro I Ortiz,&nbsp;Rodrigo Barrera,&nbsp;Carlos Julián Rodriguez,&nbsp;Miguel E Ochoa","doi":"10.4137/OED.S38364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a retrospective interventional case series including 80 eyes of 48 patients with keratoconus (KC) who were treated with modified corneal cross-linking (CXL) for KC (with a partial deepithelization in a pattern of stripes). The average follow-up was 5.8 years (with a minimum of 5 years). At the last follow-up visit, compared with preoperative values, there were no significant changes in spherical equivalent, average keratometry, corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, or corneal resistance factor. The distance-corrected visual acuity was 20/39 preoperatively and 20/36 postoperatively (P = 0.3). The endothelial cell count decreased by 4.7% (P < 0.005). These findings suggest that this modified corneal CXL technique is a safe and effective alternative to halt the progression of KC up to five years after the procedure. However, some concerns remain as to whether this technique can affect in some degree the corneal endothelial cells. </p>","PeriodicalId":74362,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and eye diseases","volume":"8 ","pages":"17-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/OED.S38364","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corneal Cross-Linking (with a Partial Deepithelization) in Keratoconus with Five Years of Follow-Up.\",\"authors\":\"Virgilio Galvis,&nbsp;Alejandro Tello,&nbsp;Néstor I Carreño,&nbsp;Alvaro I Ortiz,&nbsp;Rodrigo Barrera,&nbsp;Carlos Julián Rodriguez,&nbsp;Miguel E Ochoa\",\"doi\":\"10.4137/OED.S38364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We performed a retrospective interventional case series including 80 eyes of 48 patients with keratoconus (KC) who were treated with modified corneal cross-linking (CXL) for KC (with a partial deepithelization in a pattern of stripes). The average follow-up was 5.8 years (with a minimum of 5 years). At the last follow-up visit, compared with preoperative values, there were no significant changes in spherical equivalent, average keratometry, corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, or corneal resistance factor. The distance-corrected visual acuity was 20/39 preoperatively and 20/36 postoperatively (P = 0.3). The endothelial cell count decreased by 4.7% (P < 0.005). These findings suggest that this modified corneal CXL technique is a safe and effective alternative to halt the progression of KC up to five years after the procedure. However, some concerns remain as to whether this technique can affect in some degree the corneal endothelial cells. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology and eye diseases\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"17-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/OED.S38364\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology and eye diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4137/OED.S38364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and eye diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/OED.S38364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

我们对48例圆锥角膜(KC)患者的80只眼进行了回顾性介入病例系列研究,这些患者接受了改良角膜交联(CXL)治疗KC(以条纹模式进行部分深度化)。平均随访5.8年(最少5年)。最后一次随访时,与术前相比,球体当量、平均角膜密度、角膜厚度、角膜迟滞或角膜阻力因子均无明显变化。术前矫正视力为20/39,术后矫正视力为20/36 (P = 0.3)。内皮细胞计数减少4.7% (P < 0.005)。这些发现表明,这种改良的角膜CXL技术是一种安全有效的替代方法,可以在手术后5年内阻止KC的进展。然而,这项技术是否会在一定程度上影响角膜内皮细胞仍存在一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Corneal Cross-Linking (with a Partial Deepithelization) in Keratoconus with Five Years of Follow-Up.

Corneal Cross-Linking (with a Partial Deepithelization) in Keratoconus with Five Years of Follow-Up.

Corneal Cross-Linking (with a Partial Deepithelization) in Keratoconus with Five Years of Follow-Up.

Corneal Cross-Linking (with a Partial Deepithelization) in Keratoconus with Five Years of Follow-Up.

We performed a retrospective interventional case series including 80 eyes of 48 patients with keratoconus (KC) who were treated with modified corneal cross-linking (CXL) for KC (with a partial deepithelization in a pattern of stripes). The average follow-up was 5.8 years (with a minimum of 5 years). At the last follow-up visit, compared with preoperative values, there were no significant changes in spherical equivalent, average keratometry, corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis, or corneal resistance factor. The distance-corrected visual acuity was 20/39 preoperatively and 20/36 postoperatively (P = 0.3). The endothelial cell count decreased by 4.7% (P < 0.005). These findings suggest that this modified corneal CXL technique is a safe and effective alternative to halt the progression of KC up to five years after the procedure. However, some concerns remain as to whether this technique can affect in some degree the corneal endothelial cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信