约旦原则与加拿大土著残疾儿童:管辖权、倡导和研究。

Shelly Johnson
{"title":"约旦原则与加拿大土著残疾儿童:管辖权、倡导和研究。","authors":"Shelly Johnson","doi":"10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses Indigenous (1) (1)In this article, the terms Indigenous, First Nations, Aboriginal, and Treaty Indian are used interchangeably, and as needed to describe the political reality of the First Peoples of Canada. children with disabilities in Canada and examines their experiences with federal and provincial jurisdictional and funding disputes. It explores Canada's adversarial legal and policy techniques to delay implementation and funding of Jordan's Principle, a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal action seeking to address the delays, and the recommendations of a recent independent Canadian research project. Finally, it suggests ways to advance Jordan's Principle in Canada and elsewhere. </p>","PeriodicalId":87649,"journal":{"name":"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"233-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jordan's principle and Indigenous children with disabilities in Canada: jurisdiction, advocacy, and research.\",\"authors\":\"Shelly Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article discusses Indigenous (1) (1)In this article, the terms Indigenous, First Nations, Aboriginal, and Treaty Indian are used interchangeably, and as needed to describe the political reality of the First Peoples of Canada. children with disabilities in Canada and examines their experiences with federal and provincial jurisdictional and funding disputes. It explores Canada's adversarial legal and policy techniques to delay implementation and funding of Jordan's Principle, a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal action seeking to address the delays, and the recommendations of a recent independent Canadian research project. Finally, it suggests ways to advance Jordan's Principle in Canada and elsewhere. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"14 3-4\",\"pages\":\"233-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2015.1068260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在本文中,土著、第一民族、土著和条约印第安人这些术语可以互换使用,并根据需要描述加拿大第一民族的政治现实。研究加拿大的残疾儿童,并研究他们在联邦和省级司法和资金纠纷方面的经验。它探讨了加拿大的对抗性法律和政策技术,以延迟约旦原则的实施和资助,加拿大人权法庭的一项行动,寻求解决拖延问题,以及最近加拿大独立研究项目的建议。最后,它提出了在加拿大和其他地方推进约旦原则的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jordan's principle and Indigenous children with disabilities in Canada: jurisdiction, advocacy, and research.

This article discusses Indigenous (1) (1)In this article, the terms Indigenous, First Nations, Aboriginal, and Treaty Indian are used interchangeably, and as needed to describe the political reality of the First Peoples of Canada. children with disabilities in Canada and examines their experiences with federal and provincial jurisdictional and funding disputes. It explores Canada's adversarial legal and policy techniques to delay implementation and funding of Jordan's Principle, a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal action seeking to address the delays, and the recommendations of a recent independent Canadian research project. Finally, it suggests ways to advance Jordan's Principle in Canada and elsewhere.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信