超声引导坐骨政治神经阻滞:胫骨和腓总神经分离注射与近端分支注射的比较。

Magdy H Eldegwy, Sami M Ibrahim, Samy Hanora, Elsayed Elkarta, Ayman S Elsily
{"title":"超声引导坐骨政治神经阻滞:胫骨和腓总神经分离注射与近端分支注射的比较。","authors":"Magdy H Eldegwy,&nbsp;Sami M Ibrahim,&nbsp;Samy Hanora,&nbsp;Elsayed Elkarta,&nbsp;Ayman S Elsily","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Block of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa can be performed using the ultrasound machine; it may be proximally or distally to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve using lateral, medial, or posterior approaches. It is frequently used for surgeries below the knee specially the foot and ankle operations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares one and two injections of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa with ultrasound-guided block in foot or ankle surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients received ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with the nerve stimulator, using the posterior approach. The patients were enrolled into two groups (20 patients each), group 1: received one injection at 2 cm cephalad to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve, and group 2: received two injections caudate to the sciatic bifurcation; one for tibial nerve and the other for common peroneal nerve. All patients received 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5%. The block performance time, block efficacy, success rate, complications and patient's satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Block the tibial and common peroneal nerves separately (two injections) distal to the point of bifurcation of the sciatic nerve has a significantly (P < 0.05) faster time to complete sensory block of tibial and common peroneal nerves compared to a pre-bifurcation sciatic nerve block (one injection). The complete motor block, block time performance, success rate and patient's satisfaction were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The block of tibial and common peroneal nerves separately distal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation is superior to single injection block of sciatic nerve above the bifurcation in the popliteal fossa as regard complete sensory block time.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SCIATIC POLITEAL NERVE BLOCK: A COMPARISON OF SEPARATE TIBIAL AND COMMON PERONEAL NERVE INJECTIONS VERSUS INJECTING PROXIMAL TO THE BIFURCATION.\",\"authors\":\"Magdy H Eldegwy,&nbsp;Sami M Ibrahim,&nbsp;Samy Hanora,&nbsp;Elsayed Elkarta,&nbsp;Ayman S Elsily\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Block of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa can be performed using the ultrasound machine; it may be proximally or distally to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve using lateral, medial, or posterior approaches. It is frequently used for surgeries below the knee specially the foot and ankle operations.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compares one and two injections of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa with ultrasound-guided block in foot or ankle surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty patients received ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with the nerve stimulator, using the posterior approach. The patients were enrolled into two groups (20 patients each), group 1: received one injection at 2 cm cephalad to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve, and group 2: received two injections caudate to the sciatic bifurcation; one for tibial nerve and the other for common peroneal nerve. All patients received 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5%. The block performance time, block efficacy, success rate, complications and patient's satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Block the tibial and common peroneal nerves separately (two injections) distal to the point of bifurcation of the sciatic nerve has a significantly (P < 0.05) faster time to complete sensory block of tibial and common peroneal nerves compared to a pre-bifurcation sciatic nerve block (one injection). The complete motor block, block time performance, success rate and patient's satisfaction were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The block of tibial and common peroneal nerves separately distal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation is superior to single injection block of sciatic nerve above the bifurcation in the popliteal fossa as regard complete sensory block time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用超声机可以在腘窝处进行坐骨神经阻滞;它可以在坐骨神经分支的近端或远端采用外侧入路、内侧入路或后入路。它经常用于膝盖以下的手术,特别是足部和踝关节的手术。目的:比较超声引导下腘窝坐骨神经一次和两次注射在足部或踝关节手术中的应用。方法:超声引导下经后路神经刺激器坐骨神经阻滞40例。将患者分为两组,每组20例,组1:在坐骨神经分叉头2 cm处注射1针,组2:在坐骨神经分叉尾状处注射2针;一个是胫骨神经,另一个是腓总神经。所有患者均给予0.5%左布比卡因20 ml。观察阻滞时间、阻滞效果、成功率、并发症及患者满意度。结果:在坐骨神经分叉点远端分别阻断胫骨和腓总神经(两次注射)比在坐骨神经分叉点前阻断(一次注射)完成胫骨和腓总神经感觉阻滞的时间明显(P < 0.05)快。两组间运动完全阻滞、阻滞时间、成功率及患者满意度差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:胫骨神经和腓总神经分别在坐骨神经分岔远端阻滞优于腘窝分岔上方坐骨神经单次阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SCIATIC POLITEAL NERVE BLOCK: A COMPARISON OF SEPARATE TIBIAL AND COMMON PERONEAL NERVE INJECTIONS VERSUS INJECTING PROXIMAL TO THE BIFURCATION.

Objective: Block of the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa can be performed using the ultrasound machine; it may be proximally or distally to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve using lateral, medial, or posterior approaches. It is frequently used for surgeries below the knee specially the foot and ankle operations.

Purpose: This study compares one and two injections of the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa with ultrasound-guided block in foot or ankle surgeries.

Methods: Forty patients received ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block with the nerve stimulator, using the posterior approach. The patients were enrolled into two groups (20 patients each), group 1: received one injection at 2 cm cephalad to the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve, and group 2: received two injections caudate to the sciatic bifurcation; one for tibial nerve and the other for common peroneal nerve. All patients received 20 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5%. The block performance time, block efficacy, success rate, complications and patient's satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: Block the tibial and common peroneal nerves separately (two injections) distal to the point of bifurcation of the sciatic nerve has a significantly (P < 0.05) faster time to complete sensory block of tibial and common peroneal nerves compared to a pre-bifurcation sciatic nerve block (one injection). The complete motor block, block time performance, success rate and patient's satisfaction were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The block of tibial and common peroneal nerves separately distal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation is superior to single injection block of sciatic nerve above the bifurcation in the popliteal fossa as regard complete sensory block time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信