两种脑电图峰值检测算法的鲁棒性比较。

Q3 Medicine
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2015-07-23 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874120701509010151
Sahbi Chaibi, Tarek Lajnef, Abdelbacet Ghrob, Mounir Samet, Abdennaceur Kachouri
{"title":"两种脑电图峰值检测算法的鲁棒性比较。","authors":"Sahbi Chaibi,&nbsp;Tarek Lajnef,&nbsp;Abdelbacet Ghrob,&nbsp;Mounir Samet,&nbsp;Abdennaceur Kachouri","doi":"10.2174/1874120701509010151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spikes and sharp waves recorded on scalp EEG may play an important role in identifying the epileptogenic network as well as in understanding the central nervous system. Therefore, several automatic and semi-automatic methods have been implemented to detect these two neural transients. A consistent gold standard associated with a high degree of agreement among neuroscientists is required to measure relevant performance of different methods. In fact, scalp EEG data can often be corrupted by a set of artifacts and are not always served as data of gold standard. For this reason, the use of intracerebral EEG data mixed with gaussian noise seems to best resemble the output of scalp EEG brain and serves as a consistent gold standard. In the present framework, we test the robustness of two important methods that have been previously used for the automatic detection of epileptiform transients (spikes and sharp waves). These methods are based respectively on Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Our purpose is to elaborate a comparative study in terms of sensitivity and selectivity changes via the decrease of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), which is ranged from 10 dB up to -10 dB. The results demonstrate that, DWT approach turns to be more stable in terms of sensitivity, and it successfully follows the detection of relevant spikes with the decrease of SNR. However, CWT-based approach remains more stable in terms of selectivity, so that, it performs well in terms of rejecting false spikes compared to DWT approach. </p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"9 ","pages":"151-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/4b/TOBEJ-9-151.PMC4541300.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.\",\"authors\":\"Sahbi Chaibi,&nbsp;Tarek Lajnef,&nbsp;Abdelbacet Ghrob,&nbsp;Mounir Samet,&nbsp;Abdennaceur Kachouri\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701509010151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spikes and sharp waves recorded on scalp EEG may play an important role in identifying the epileptogenic network as well as in understanding the central nervous system. Therefore, several automatic and semi-automatic methods have been implemented to detect these two neural transients. A consistent gold standard associated with a high degree of agreement among neuroscientists is required to measure relevant performance of different methods. In fact, scalp EEG data can often be corrupted by a set of artifacts and are not always served as data of gold standard. For this reason, the use of intracerebral EEG data mixed with gaussian noise seems to best resemble the output of scalp EEG brain and serves as a consistent gold standard. In the present framework, we test the robustness of two important methods that have been previously used for the automatic detection of epileptiform transients (spikes and sharp waves). These methods are based respectively on Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Our purpose is to elaborate a comparative study in terms of sensitivity and selectivity changes via the decrease of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), which is ranged from 10 dB up to -10 dB. The results demonstrate that, DWT approach turns to be more stable in terms of sensitivity, and it successfully follows the detection of relevant spikes with the decrease of SNR. However, CWT-based approach remains more stable in terms of selectivity, so that, it performs well in terms of rejecting false spikes compared to DWT approach. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"151-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/4b/TOBEJ-9-151.PMC4541300.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

头皮脑电图记录的尖峰和尖波在识别癫痫发生网络和理解中枢神经系统方面具有重要作用。因此,已经实现了几种自动和半自动的方法来检测这两种神经瞬变。衡量不同方法的相关性能需要神经科学家之间高度一致的一致金标准。事实上,头皮EEG数据经常会被一组伪影破坏,并不总是作为金标准数据。因此,混合高斯噪声的脑内EEG数据的使用似乎最接近头皮EEG脑输出,可以作为一致的金标准。在目前的框架中,我们测试了两种重要方法的鲁棒性,这两种方法以前被用于癫痫样瞬态(尖峰和尖波)的自动检测。这些方法分别基于离散小波变换和连续小波变换。我们的目的是详细阐述通过降低信噪比(SNR)来改变灵敏度和选择性的比较研究,信噪比的范围从10 dB到-10 dB。结果表明,DWT方法在灵敏度方面变得更加稳定,并且随着信噪比的降低,它成功地跟踪了相关尖峰的检测。然而,基于cwt的方法在选择性方面仍然更加稳定,因此,与DWT方法相比,它在拒绝假尖峰方面表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.

A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.

A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.

A Robustness Comparison of Two Algorithms Used for EEG Spike Detection.

Spikes and sharp waves recorded on scalp EEG may play an important role in identifying the epileptogenic network as well as in understanding the central nervous system. Therefore, several automatic and semi-automatic methods have been implemented to detect these two neural transients. A consistent gold standard associated with a high degree of agreement among neuroscientists is required to measure relevant performance of different methods. In fact, scalp EEG data can often be corrupted by a set of artifacts and are not always served as data of gold standard. For this reason, the use of intracerebral EEG data mixed with gaussian noise seems to best resemble the output of scalp EEG brain and serves as a consistent gold standard. In the present framework, we test the robustness of two important methods that have been previously used for the automatic detection of epileptiform transients (spikes and sharp waves). These methods are based respectively on Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT). Our purpose is to elaborate a comparative study in terms of sensitivity and selectivity changes via the decrease of Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), which is ranged from 10 dB up to -10 dB. The results demonstrate that, DWT approach turns to be more stable in terms of sensitivity, and it successfully follows the detection of relevant spikes with the decrease of SNR. However, CWT-based approach remains more stable in terms of selectivity, so that, it performs well in terms of rejecting false spikes compared to DWT approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信