肺栓塞严重程度指数是否被常规应用于临床实践?

Thrombosis Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-07-29 DOI:10.1155/2015/175357
Ali Shafiq, Hamza Lodhi, Zaheer Ahmed, Ata Bajwa
{"title":"肺栓塞严重程度指数是否被常规应用于临床实践?","authors":"Ali Shafiq,&nbsp;Hamza Lodhi,&nbsp;Zaheer Ahmed,&nbsp;Ata Bajwa","doi":"10.1155/2015/175357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86-105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use. </p>","PeriodicalId":75222,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis","volume":"2015 ","pages":"175357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?\",\"authors\":\"Ali Shafiq,&nbsp;Hamza Lodhi,&nbsp;Zaheer Ahmed,&nbsp;Ata Bajwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/175357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86-105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis\",\"volume\":\"2015 \",\"pages\":\"175357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/175357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景。肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)评分可以对PE患者进行风险分层,但其广泛应用尚不确定。通过PESI,我们比较了低、中、高风险PE患者的住院时间,并确定了早期出院的低风险PE患者的数量。方法。对2005年1月至2010年8月在奥克兰圣约瑟夫慈悲医院(St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital)住院的PE患者进行筛查。PESI评分将急性PE患者分为低危(105)类,并比较其住院时间。计算早期(≤3天)出院的低风险PE患者。结果。315例PE患者中,51.7%为低危。低危(7.11±3 d)与中度危(6.88±2.9 d)、低危(7.28±3.0 d)与高危(7.28±3.0 d)住院时间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。9%的低危患者出院≤3天。结论。低风险组和高风险组的住院时间没有显著差异,只有少数低风险患者提前出院,这表明像PESI这样的风险工具可能没有广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?

Background. The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) score can risk-stratify patients with PE but its widespread use is uncertain. With the PESI, we compared length of hospital stay between low, moderate, and high risk PE patients and determined the number of low risk PE patients who were discharged early. Methods. PE patients admitted to St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital from January 2005 to August 2010 were screened. PESI score stratified acute PE patients into low (<85), moderate (86-105), and high (>105) risk categories and their length of hospital stay was compared. Patients with low risk PE discharged early (≤3 days) were calculated. Results. Among 315 PE patients, 51.7% were at low risk. No significant difference in hospital stay between low (7.11 ± 3 d) and moderate (6.88 ± 2.9 d) risk, p > 0.05, as well as low and high risk (7.28 ± 3.0 d), p > 0.05, was found. 9% of low risk patients were discharged ≤ 3 days. Conclusions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between low and high risk groups and only a small number of low risk patients were discharged from the hospital early suggesting that risk tools like PESI may not have a widespread use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信