警方调查:拒绝行使自由裁量权,但又无可否认。

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
J Belur, N Tilley, D Osrin, N Daruwalla, M Kumar, V Tiwari
{"title":"警方调查:拒绝行使自由裁量权,但又无可否认。","authors":"J Belur, N Tilley, D Osrin, N Daruwalla, M Kumar, V Tiwari","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2013.878343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Police investigations involve determining whether a crime has been committed, and if so what type of crime, who has committed it and whether there is the evidence to charge the perpetrators. Drawing on fieldwork in Delhi and Mumbai, this paper explores how police investigations unfolded in the specific context of women's deaths by burning in India. In particular, it focuses on the use of discretion despite its denial by those exercising it. In India, there are distinctive statutes relating to women's suspicious deaths, reflecting the widespread expectation that the bride's family will pay a dowry to the groom's family and the tensions to which this may on occasion give rise in the early years of a marriage. Often, there are conflicting claims influencing how the woman's death is classified. These in turn affect police investigation. The nature and direction of police discretion in investigating women's deaths by burning reflect in part the unique nature of the legislation and the particular sensitivities in relation to these types of death. They also highlight processes that are liable to be at work in any crime investigation. It was found that police officers exercised unacknowledged discretion at seven specific points in the investigative process, with potentially significant consequences for the achievement of just outcomes: first response, recording the victim's 'dying declaration', inquest, registering of the 'First Information Report', collecting evidence, arrest and framing of the charges.</p>","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338498/pdf/emss-57337.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Police investigations: discretion denied yet undeniably exercised.\",\"authors\":\"J Belur, N Tilley, D Osrin, N Daruwalla, M Kumar, V Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.2013.878343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Police investigations involve determining whether a crime has been committed, and if so what type of crime, who has committed it and whether there is the evidence to charge the perpetrators. Drawing on fieldwork in Delhi and Mumbai, this paper explores how police investigations unfolded in the specific context of women's deaths by burning in India. In particular, it focuses on the use of discretion despite its denial by those exercising it. In India, there are distinctive statutes relating to women's suspicious deaths, reflecting the widespread expectation that the bride's family will pay a dowry to the groom's family and the tensions to which this may on occasion give rise in the early years of a marriage. Often, there are conflicting claims influencing how the woman's death is classified. These in turn affect police investigation. The nature and direction of police discretion in investigating women's deaths by burning reflect in part the unique nature of the legislation and the particular sensitivities in relation to these types of death. They also highlight processes that are liable to be at work in any crime investigation. It was found that police officers exercised unacknowledged discretion at seven specific points in the investigative process, with potentially significant consequences for the achievement of just outcomes: first response, recording the victim's 'dying declaration', inquest, registering of the 'First Information Report', collecting evidence, arrest and framing of the charges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338498/pdf/emss-57337.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.878343\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.878343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

警方调查涉及确定是否发生了犯罪,如果发生了犯罪,是哪种类型的犯罪,犯罪人是谁,以及是否有证据指控犯罪人。本文通过在德里和孟买的实地调查,探讨了在印度妇女被烧死的具体情况下,警方是如何展开调查的。本文尤其关注在行使自由裁量权的人否认自由裁量权的情况下,自由裁量权的使用情况。印度有关于妇女可疑死亡的独特法规,反映了人们普遍期望新娘家向新郎家支付嫁妆,以及这种期望有时会在婚姻初期引发的紧张局势。在对妇女的死亡进行分类时,往往会出现相互矛盾的说法。这些反过来又会影响警方的调查。警方在调查妇女被焚烧致死案件时的自由裁量权的性质和方向在一定程度上反映了立法的独特性以及与这类死亡有关的特殊敏感性。它们还突显了在任何犯罪调查中都有可能发生作用的过程。调查发现,警官在调查过程中的七个具体环节行使了不被认可的自由裁量权,这可能会对实现公正结果产生重大影响:第一反应、记录受害者的 "临终声明"、审讯、登记 "首次信息报告"、收集证据、逮捕和提出指控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Police investigations: discretion denied yet undeniably exercised.

Police investigations: discretion denied yet undeniably exercised.

Police investigations involve determining whether a crime has been committed, and if so what type of crime, who has committed it and whether there is the evidence to charge the perpetrators. Drawing on fieldwork in Delhi and Mumbai, this paper explores how police investigations unfolded in the specific context of women's deaths by burning in India. In particular, it focuses on the use of discretion despite its denial by those exercising it. In India, there are distinctive statutes relating to women's suspicious deaths, reflecting the widespread expectation that the bride's family will pay a dowry to the groom's family and the tensions to which this may on occasion give rise in the early years of a marriage. Often, there are conflicting claims influencing how the woman's death is classified. These in turn affect police investigation. The nature and direction of police discretion in investigating women's deaths by burning reflect in part the unique nature of the legislation and the particular sensitivities in relation to these types of death. They also highlight processes that are liable to be at work in any crime investigation. It was found that police officers exercised unacknowledged discretion at seven specific points in the investigative process, with potentially significant consequences for the achievement of just outcomes: first response, recording the victim's 'dying declaration', inquest, registering of the 'First Information Report', collecting evidence, arrest and framing of the charges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信