LMA Supreme, i-gel和Baska面罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中气道管理的比较:一项来自北印度的前瞻性随机比较研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-14 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_23_22
Parul Sharma, Sujeet Rai, Manoj Tripathi, Deepak Malviya, Sumita Kumari, Smarika Mishra
{"title":"LMA Supreme, i-gel和Baska面罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中气道管理的比较:一项来自北印度的前瞻性随机比较研究。","authors":"Parul Sharma,&nbsp;Sujeet Rai,&nbsp;Manoj Tripathi,&nbsp;Deepak Malviya,&nbsp;Sumita Kumari,&nbsp;Smarika Mishra","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_23_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni <i>post hoc</i> multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OLP was significantly higher (<i>P</i> = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558661/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.\",\"authors\":\"Parul Sharma,&nbsp;Sujeet Rai,&nbsp;Manoj Tripathi,&nbsp;Deepak Malviya,&nbsp;Sumita Kumari,&nbsp;Smarika Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_23_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni <i>post hoc</i> multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OLP was significantly higher (<i>P</i> = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"42-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558661/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_23_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_23_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:声门上气道装置(SAD)由于其减少气道操作和血流动力学稳定等优点,已被证明是腹腔镜手术中气管内插管的合适替代方案。目的:我们比较了喉罩(LMA)-Supreme (LMA- s)、i-gel和Baska面罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者口咽漏压(OLP)和安全性方面的疗效。背景和设计:选择90例择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在三级医疗中心进行前瞻性随机比较研究。材料和方法:根据不同的SADs分为三组,每组30人,分别使用Group-LS组与LMA-Supreme, Group-IG组与i-gel, Group-BM组与Baska mask。次要目标是器械插入时间、插入难易程度、气道峰值压(PAP)的变化、心率、平均动脉压和气道并发症(喉咙痛、吞咽困难)。发音障碍、唇/舌或牙齿损伤等)。统计分析:定量资料采用单因素方差检验和Bonferroni事后多重比较检验进行分析。定性资料用Chi进行比较。方测试。结果:Baska面罩组的OLP明显高于i-gel组和LMA-S组(P = 0.005)。两组患者植针时间、植针次数、植针难易程度、手法使用差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。BM组胃管插入时间(9.59±2.78)明显低于IG组(12.79±3.47)和LS组(10.84±3.68)(P < 0.05)。两组间PAP、心率、不同时间间隔平均动脉压变化及并发症无显著差异。结论:Baska面罩在腹腔镜手术中提供的OLP明显高于i-gel和LMA-S,且无明显气道并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.

Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.

Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.

Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.

Background: The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.

Aims: We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Settings and design: Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.

Statistical analysis: The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.

Results: OLP was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation (P > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.

Conclusion: Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信