痴呆症快速评级系统(QDRS)的验证和扩展。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-14 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2129056
Peter V Stewart, Brian E Tapscott, Beate Davis, Joseph J Boscarino, Keshia Sanders, Sarajane E Rodgers, Maya L Lichtenstein
{"title":"痴呆症快速评级系统(QDRS)的验证和扩展。","authors":"Peter V Stewart, Brian E Tapscott, Beate Davis, Joseph J Boscarino, Keshia Sanders, Sarajane E Rodgers, Maya L Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2129056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informant report dementia severity staging measures, such as the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) offer clinicians useful diagnostic and staging information. These measures also potentially avoid many of the pitfalls inherent in mental status examinations (e.g., cultural bias, educational bias, floor and ceiling effects). We derive cut points for the QDRS and comprehensively examine their classification accuracy in a large, diagnostically heterogeneous, rural, memory disorder clinic sample. Our findings suggest the QDRS may be helpful when used in the context of a comprehensive diagnostic and staging evaluation. When used in isolation, the QDRS is insufficiently accurate for diagnosis and staging of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1375-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation and extension of the quick dementia rating system (QDRS).\",\"authors\":\"Peter V Stewart, Brian E Tapscott, Beate Davis, Joseph J Boscarino, Keshia Sanders, Sarajane E Rodgers, Maya L Lichtenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2022.2129056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Informant report dementia severity staging measures, such as the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) offer clinicians useful diagnostic and staging information. These measures also potentially avoid many of the pitfalls inherent in mental status examinations (e.g., cultural bias, educational bias, floor and ceiling effects). We derive cut points for the QDRS and comprehensively examine their classification accuracy in a large, diagnostically heterogeneous, rural, memory disorder clinic sample. Our findings suggest the QDRS may be helpful when used in the context of a comprehensive diagnostic and staging evaluation. When used in isolation, the QDRS is insufficiently accurate for diagnosis and staging of dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1375-1382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2129056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2129056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由知情者报告的痴呆严重程度分期措施,如快速痴呆分级系统(QDRS),可为临床医生提供有用的诊断和分期信息。这些测量方法还可以避免精神状态检查中固有的许多缺陷(如文化偏差、教育偏差、下限和上限效应)。我们推导出了 QDRS 的切点,并在一个大型、诊断异质、农村记忆障碍诊所样本中全面检查了其分类准确性。我们的研究结果表明,在综合诊断和分期评估中使用 QDRS 可能会有所帮助。如果单独使用,QDRS 对痴呆症的诊断和分期不够准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation and extension of the quick dementia rating system (QDRS).

Informant report dementia severity staging measures, such as the Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) offer clinicians useful diagnostic and staging information. These measures also potentially avoid many of the pitfalls inherent in mental status examinations (e.g., cultural bias, educational bias, floor and ceiling effects). We derive cut points for the QDRS and comprehensively examine their classification accuracy in a large, diagnostically heterogeneous, rural, memory disorder clinic sample. Our findings suggest the QDRS may be helpful when used in the context of a comprehensive diagnostic and staging evaluation. When used in isolation, the QDRS is insufficiently accurate for diagnosis and staging of dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信