{"title":"两种不同复合材料粘接附着物成功率的研究","authors":"Pierre Couraud","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The choice of composite type is an important factor and can affect the success of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate of two light-curing composites and to evaluate the effectiveness of each in vivo. The two composites studied were Transbond XT® (3M®) and BracePaste® (American Orthodontics®).</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An analytical, experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted. A sample of 22 patients with a total of 440 teeth was selected. The decemented brackets were considered from the central incisor to the second premolar. A software was used to randomly distribute the type of adhesive according to the right and left side of the patient. Thus, Transbond XT® was used in two quadrants and BracePaste® in the other two. Braces that were not decemented after six mounths were considered successful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four failures with BracePaste® and three with Transbond XT were observed. These are respectivly 18.2% vs 13.6% among the 22 patients and 0.9% vs 0.7% among the 440 teeth (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many studies have tested the efficacy of adhesives in vitro and many have failed to predict in vivo efficacy. Therefore, the aim of our study was interesting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample, no difference in bonding failure was observed between Transbond XT® and BracePaste®.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of the success rate in bonding attachments with two different composites\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Couraud\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The choice of composite type is an important factor and can affect the success of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate of two light-curing composites and to evaluate the effectiveness of each in vivo. The two composites studied were Transbond XT® (3M®) and BracePaste® (American Orthodontics®).</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An analytical, experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted. A sample of 22 patients with a total of 440 teeth was selected. The decemented brackets were considered from the central incisor to the second premolar. A software was used to randomly distribute the type of adhesive according to the right and left side of the patient. Thus, Transbond XT® was used in two quadrants and BracePaste® in the other two. Braces that were not decemented after six mounths were considered successful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four failures with BracePaste® and three with Transbond XT were observed. These are respectivly 18.2% vs 13.6% among the 22 patients and 0.9% vs 0.7% among the 440 teeth (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many studies have tested the efficacy of adhesives in vitro and many have failed to predict in vivo efficacy. Therefore, the aim of our study was interesting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample, no difference in bonding failure was observed between Transbond XT® and BracePaste®.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Study of the success rate in bonding attachments with two different composites
Introduction: The choice of composite type is an important factor and can affect the success of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate of two light-curing composites and to evaluate the effectiveness of each in vivo. The two composites studied were Transbond XT® (3M®) and BracePaste® (American Orthodontics®).
Material and method: An analytical, experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted. A sample of 22 patients with a total of 440 teeth was selected. The decemented brackets were considered from the central incisor to the second premolar. A software was used to randomly distribute the type of adhesive according to the right and left side of the patient. Thus, Transbond XT® was used in two quadrants and BracePaste® in the other two. Braces that were not decemented after six mounths were considered successful.
Results: Four failures with BracePaste® and three with Transbond XT were observed. These are respectivly 18.2% vs 13.6% among the 22 patients and 0.9% vs 0.7% among the 440 teeth (p>0.05).
Discussion: Many studies have tested the efficacy of adhesives in vitro and many have failed to predict in vivo efficacy. Therefore, the aim of our study was interesting.
Conclusions: In our sample, no difference in bonding failure was observed between Transbond XT® and BracePaste®.
期刊介绍：
L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
