反对意见:学术界对元分析的盲目信仰可能对公共卫生构成威胁。

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-15 DOI:10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308
Jae Hyun Bae
{"title":"反对意见:学术界对元分析的盲目信仰可能对公共卫生构成威胁。","authors":"Jae Hyun Bae","doi":"10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%–1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.6%) for stroke in people who received statins compared with placebo or usual care. The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 9% (95% CI, 5%–14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%–34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%–22%), respectively. These findings were consistent in primary prevention and secondary prevention populations. However, significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed depending on the outcomes and study populations.","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"11 3","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/04/jla-11-308.PMC9515736.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hyun Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%–1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.6%) for stroke in people who received statins compared with placebo or usual care. The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 9% (95% CI, 5%–14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%–34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%–22%), respectively. These findings were consistent in primary prevention and secondary prevention populations. However, significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed depending on the outcomes and study populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"308-313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/04/jla-11-308.PMC9515736.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.
for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%–1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%–0.6%) for stroke in people who received statins compared with placebo or usual care. The relative risk reduction (RRR) was 9% (95% CI, 5%–14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%–34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%–22%), respectively. These findings were consistent in primary prevention and secondary prevention populations. However, significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity was observed depending on the outcomes and study populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信