使用众包图像来确定2D:4D和亲环境变量的关系

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Gary J. Pickering, Nicholas Anger, Julia Baird, Gillian Dale, Glenn J. Tattersall
{"title":"使用众包图像来确定2D:4D和亲环境变量的关系","authors":"Gary J. Pickering,&nbsp;Nicholas Anger,&nbsp;Julia Baird,&nbsp;Gillian Dale,&nbsp;Glenn J. Tattersall","doi":"10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether 2D:4D ratios (a putative measure of prenatal androgen exposure) could be determined using participant-submitted hand images. The secondary purpose was to examine whether 2D:4D ratio was associated with pro-environmental behaviors, attitudes, and empathy, given the recent literature linking sex to environmental attitudes and actions. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1065) were asked via an online survey to submit a clear photograph of their right hand, palm side up. Participants also completed a questionnaire to assess (a) demographics, (b) dispositional empathy, and (c) environmental attitudes and behavior. A 2D:4D ratio was calculated for each participant, and the quality of each image was classified as poor, moderate, or good. We then examined the reliability of the 2D:4D image measurements, and the relationship between 2D:4D and our environmental measures. 2D:4D ratios fell somewhat outside of previously reported ranges, but the measurements did show acceptable intra-rater consistency. Although we did not find a sex difference in 2D:4D, we did find a sex by ratio interaction for both empathy and the number of pro-environmental behaviors in which individuals had engaged. Specifically, as 2D:4D ratio increased, males reported lower empathy and less engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, whereas females reported more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors (but no differences in empathy). These findings were contrary to expectations, as we anticipated that greater digit ratios (i.e., feminized) would be associated with greater empathy and pro-environmental behaviors. Overall, the findings of this study present a preliminary examination of the utility of measuring digit ratio with online samples. Furthermore, our results provide information regarding the complex relationship between sex and pro-environmental behaviors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6879,"journal":{"name":"acta ethologica","volume":"25 3","pages":"165 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables\",\"authors\":\"Gary J. Pickering,&nbsp;Nicholas Anger,&nbsp;Julia Baird,&nbsp;Gillian Dale,&nbsp;Glenn J. Tattersall\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether 2D:4D ratios (a putative measure of prenatal androgen exposure) could be determined using participant-submitted hand images. The secondary purpose was to examine whether 2D:4D ratio was associated with pro-environmental behaviors, attitudes, and empathy, given the recent literature linking sex to environmental attitudes and actions. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1065) were asked via an online survey to submit a clear photograph of their right hand, palm side up. Participants also completed a questionnaire to assess (a) demographics, (b) dispositional empathy, and (c) environmental attitudes and behavior. A 2D:4D ratio was calculated for each participant, and the quality of each image was classified as poor, moderate, or good. We then examined the reliability of the 2D:4D image measurements, and the relationship between 2D:4D and our environmental measures. 2D:4D ratios fell somewhat outside of previously reported ranges, but the measurements did show acceptable intra-rater consistency. Although we did not find a sex difference in 2D:4D, we did find a sex by ratio interaction for both empathy and the number of pro-environmental behaviors in which individuals had engaged. Specifically, as 2D:4D ratio increased, males reported lower empathy and less engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, whereas females reported more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors (but no differences in empathy). These findings were contrary to expectations, as we anticipated that greater digit ratios (i.e., feminized) would be associated with greater empathy and pro-environmental behaviors. Overall, the findings of this study present a preliminary examination of the utility of measuring digit ratio with online samples. Furthermore, our results provide information regarding the complex relationship between sex and pro-environmental behaviors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"acta ethologica\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"165 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"acta ethologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"acta ethologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的主要目的是检查2D:4D比率(产前雄激素暴露的假定测量)是否可以通过参与者提交的手部图像来确定。鉴于最近的文献将性别与环境态度和行动联系起来,第二个目的是研究2D:4D比例是否与亲环境行为、态度和同理心有关。参与者(N = 1065)被要求通过一项在线调查提交一张他们右手的清晰照片,手掌朝上。参与者还完成了一份调查问卷,以评估(a)人口统计,(b)性格同理心,(c)环境态度和行为。计算每位参与者的2D:4D比例,并将每张图像的质量分为差、中、好。然后,我们检查了2D:4D图像测量的可靠性,以及2D:4D与我们的环境测量之间的关系。2D:4D比率在一定程度上超出了先前报道的范围,但测量结果确实显示出可接受的内部一致性。虽然我们没有发现2D:4D的性别差异,但我们确实发现了同理心和个人参与的亲环境行为数量的性别比例互动。具体而言,随着2D:4D比的增加,男性的共情和亲环境行为参与度降低,而女性的亲环境行为参与度增加(但共情没有差异)。这些发现与我们的预期相反,因为我们预计更大的手指比例(即女性化)会与更大的同理心和亲环境行为有关。总体而言,本研究的结果提出了一个初步检查的效用测量数字比与在线样本。此外,我们的研究结果提供了关于性与亲环境行为之间复杂关系的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables

Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables

Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables

Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables

The primary purpose of this study was to examine whether 2D:4D ratios (a putative measure of prenatal androgen exposure) could be determined using participant-submitted hand images. The secondary purpose was to examine whether 2D:4D ratio was associated with pro-environmental behaviors, attitudes, and empathy, given the recent literature linking sex to environmental attitudes and actions. Participants (N = 1065) were asked via an online survey to submit a clear photograph of their right hand, palm side up. Participants also completed a questionnaire to assess (a) demographics, (b) dispositional empathy, and (c) environmental attitudes and behavior. A 2D:4D ratio was calculated for each participant, and the quality of each image was classified as poor, moderate, or good. We then examined the reliability of the 2D:4D image measurements, and the relationship between 2D:4D and our environmental measures. 2D:4D ratios fell somewhat outside of previously reported ranges, but the measurements did show acceptable intra-rater consistency. Although we did not find a sex difference in 2D:4D, we did find a sex by ratio interaction for both empathy and the number of pro-environmental behaviors in which individuals had engaged. Specifically, as 2D:4D ratio increased, males reported lower empathy and less engagement in pro-environmental behaviors, whereas females reported more engagement in pro-environmental behaviors (but no differences in empathy). These findings were contrary to expectations, as we anticipated that greater digit ratios (i.e., feminized) would be associated with greater empathy and pro-environmental behaviors. Overall, the findings of this study present a preliminary examination of the utility of measuring digit ratio with online samples. Furthermore, our results provide information regarding the complex relationship between sex and pro-environmental behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
acta ethologica
acta ethologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: acta ethologica publishes empirical and theoretical research papers, short communications, commentaries, reviews and book reviews as well as methods papers in the field of ethology and related disciplines, with a strong concentration on the behavior biology of humans and other animals. The journal places special emphasis on studies integrating proximate (mechanisms, development) and ultimate (function, evolution) levels in the analysis of behavior. Aspects of particular interest include: adaptive plasticity of behavior, inter-individual and geographic variations in behavior, mechanisms underlying behavior, evolutionary processes and functions of behavior, and many other topics. acta ethologica is an official journal of ISPA, CRL and the Portuguese Ethological Society (SPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信