[中老年夫妻婚姻承诺量表的信度和效度]。

Q4 Psychology
Yuko Ito, Junko Sagara
{"title":"[中老年夫妻婚姻承诺量表的信度和效度]。","authors":"Yuko Ito,&nbsp;Junko Sagara","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A marital commitment scale was created to study marital relationships of middle-aged and elderly couples. This study examined the scale's reliability, and validity. A total of 840 middle-aged and elderly married participants ranged from 37 to 89 years completed the marital commitment questionnaire and answered questions regarding marital love, perception of the balance of power between spouses, and the concept of gender roles. The results showed that marital commitment consisted of personal commitment, resigned and instrumental commitment and normative commitment. Personal commitment was highly correlated with marital love. Resigned and instrumental commitment was correlated with perception of poorly balanced of power between spouses. Normative commitment was correlated with the concept of traditional gender roles. Thus the internal consistency as well as the construct and criterion-related validity of the marital commitment scale were confirmed. Gender differences were also identified. Men scored higher on,personal and normative commitment, and women, scored higher on resigned and instrumental commitment. The results are discussed in terms of gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reliability and validity of a marital commitment scale in middle-aged and elderly couples].\",\"authors\":\"Yuko Ito,&nbsp;Junko Sagara\",\"doi\":\"10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A marital commitment scale was created to study marital relationships of middle-aged and elderly couples. This study examined the scale's reliability, and validity. A total of 840 middle-aged and elderly married participants ranged from 37 to 89 years completed the marital commitment questionnaire and answered questions regarding marital love, perception of the balance of power between spouses, and the concept of gender roles. The results showed that marital commitment consisted of personal commitment, resigned and instrumental commitment and normative commitment. Personal commitment was highly correlated with marital love. Resigned and instrumental commitment was correlated with perception of poorly balanced of power between spouses. Normative commitment was correlated with the concept of traditional gender roles. Thus the internal consistency as well as the construct and criterion-related validity of the marital commitment scale were confirmed. Gender differences were also identified. Men scored higher on,personal and normative commitment, and women, scored higher on resigned and instrumental commitment. The results are discussed in terms of gender.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shinrigaku Kenkyu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.86.14201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

采用婚姻承诺量表对中老年夫妇的婚姻关系进行研究。本研究检验了量表的信度和效度。共有840名年龄在37岁到89岁之间的中老年已婚参与者完成了婚姻承诺问卷,并回答了有关婚姻爱情、夫妻之间权力平衡的感知以及性别角色概念的问题。结果表明,婚姻承诺包括个人承诺、辞职和工具承诺和规范性承诺。个人承诺与婚姻爱情高度相关。辞职和工具性承诺与夫妻之间权力不平衡的感知相关。规范性承诺与传统的性别角色概念相关。从而证实了婚姻承诺量表的内部一致性以及量表的结构和标准相关效度。性别差异也被确认。男性在个人承诺和规范性承诺上得分更高,而女性在顺从承诺和工具性承诺上得分更高。结果在性别方面进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reliability and validity of a marital commitment scale in middle-aged and elderly couples].

A marital commitment scale was created to study marital relationships of middle-aged and elderly couples. This study examined the scale's reliability, and validity. A total of 840 middle-aged and elderly married participants ranged from 37 to 89 years completed the marital commitment questionnaire and answered questions regarding marital love, perception of the balance of power between spouses, and the concept of gender roles. The results showed that marital commitment consisted of personal commitment, resigned and instrumental commitment and normative commitment. Personal commitment was highly correlated with marital love. Resigned and instrumental commitment was correlated with perception of poorly balanced of power between spouses. Normative commitment was correlated with the concept of traditional gender roles. Thus the internal consistency as well as the construct and criterion-related validity of the marital commitment scale were confirmed. Gender differences were also identified. Men scored higher on,personal and normative commitment, and women, scored higher on resigned and instrumental commitment. The results are discussed in terms of gender.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信