微小的调整,大的改变:赋予麻醉人体研究伦理文化的另一种策略(台湾麻醉学学报台湾伦理审查工作组报告)

Hsiang-Ning Luk , John F. Ennever , Yuan-Ji Day , Chih-Shung Wong , Wei-Zen Sun
{"title":"微小的调整,大的改变:赋予麻醉人体研究伦理文化的另一种策略(台湾麻醉学学报台湾伦理审查工作组报告)","authors":"Hsiang-Ning Luk ,&nbsp;John F. Ennever ,&nbsp;Yuan-Ji Day ,&nbsp;Chih-Shung Wong ,&nbsp;Wei-Zen Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.aat.2015.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For this guidance article, the Ethics Review Task Force (ERTF) of the Journal reviewed and discussed the ethics issues related to publication of human research in the field of anesthesia. ERTF first introduced international ethics principles and minimal requirements of reporting of ethics practices, followed by discussing the universal problems of publication ethics. ERTF then compared the accountability and methodology of several medical journals in assuring authors' ethics compliance. Using the Taiwan Institutional Review Board system as an example, ERTF expressed the importance of institutional review board registration and accreditation to assure human participant protection. ERTF presented four major human research misconducts in the field of anesthesia in recent years. ERTF finally proposed a flow-chart to guide journal peer reviewers and editors in ethics review during the editorial process in publishing. Examples of template languages applied in the <em>Ethics statement</em> section in the manuscript are expected to strengthen the ethics compliance of the authors and to set an ethical culture for all the stakeholders involved in human research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87042,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","volume":"53 1","pages":"Pages 29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2015.03.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tiny tweaks, big changes: An alternative strategy to empower ethical culture of human research in anesthesia (A Taiwan Acta Anesthesiologica Taiwanica–Ethics Review Task Force Report)\",\"authors\":\"Hsiang-Ning Luk ,&nbsp;John F. Ennever ,&nbsp;Yuan-Ji Day ,&nbsp;Chih-Shung Wong ,&nbsp;Wei-Zen Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aat.2015.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For this guidance article, the Ethics Review Task Force (ERTF) of the Journal reviewed and discussed the ethics issues related to publication of human research in the field of anesthesia. ERTF first introduced international ethics principles and minimal requirements of reporting of ethics practices, followed by discussing the universal problems of publication ethics. ERTF then compared the accountability and methodology of several medical journals in assuring authors' ethics compliance. Using the Taiwan Institutional Review Board system as an example, ERTF expressed the importance of institutional review board registration and accreditation to assure human participant protection. ERTF presented four major human research misconducts in the field of anesthesia in recent years. ERTF finally proposed a flow-chart to guide journal peer reviewers and editors in ethics review during the editorial process in publishing. Examples of template languages applied in the <em>Ethics statement</em> section in the manuscript are expected to strengthen the ethics compliance of the authors and to set an ethical culture for all the stakeholders involved in human research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 29-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aat.2015.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459715000211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875459715000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在这篇指导文章中,该杂志的伦理审查工作组(ERTF)审查并讨论了与麻醉领域人类研究发表相关的伦理问题。ERTF首先介绍了国际伦理原则和伦理实践报告的最低要求,然后讨论了出版伦理的普遍问题。ERTF随后比较了几家医学期刊在确保作者道德合规方面的问责制和方法。ERTF以台湾机构审查委员会制度为例,表达了机构审查委员会注册和认证对确保人类参与者保护的重要性。ERTF是近年来麻醉领域的四大人类研究不端行为。ERTF最后提出了一个流程图,以指导期刊同行审稿人和编辑在出版编辑过程中进行伦理审查。在手稿的伦理声明部分中应用的模板语言的例子有望加强作者的伦理合规性,并为参与人类研究的所有利益相关者建立道德文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tiny tweaks, big changes: An alternative strategy to empower ethical culture of human research in anesthesia (A Taiwan Acta Anesthesiologica Taiwanica–Ethics Review Task Force Report)

For this guidance article, the Ethics Review Task Force (ERTF) of the Journal reviewed and discussed the ethics issues related to publication of human research in the field of anesthesia. ERTF first introduced international ethics principles and minimal requirements of reporting of ethics practices, followed by discussing the universal problems of publication ethics. ERTF then compared the accountability and methodology of several medical journals in assuring authors' ethics compliance. Using the Taiwan Institutional Review Board system as an example, ERTF expressed the importance of institutional review board registration and accreditation to assure human participant protection. ERTF presented four major human research misconducts in the field of anesthesia in recent years. ERTF finally proposed a flow-chart to guide journal peer reviewers and editors in ethics review during the editorial process in publishing. Examples of template languages applied in the Ethics statement section in the manuscript are expected to strengthen the ethics compliance of the authors and to set an ethical culture for all the stakeholders involved in human research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信