[我院铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对碳青霉烯类抗生素的敏感性比较]。

The Japanese journal of antibiotics Pub Date : 2014-08-01
Hiroshi Kakeya, Koichi Yamada, Kiyotaka Nakaie, Etsuko Takizawa, Yasuyo Okada, Akiko Fujita, Yasutaka Nakamura, Junko Abe, Asao Hirose, Yukihiro Kaneko, Masayuki Hino
{"title":"[我院铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对碳青霉烯类抗生素的敏感性比较]。","authors":"Hiroshi Kakeya,&nbsp;Koichi Yamada,&nbsp;Kiyotaka Nakaie,&nbsp;Etsuko Takizawa,&nbsp;Yasuyo Okada,&nbsp;Akiko Fujita,&nbsp;Yasutaka Nakamura,&nbsp;Junko Abe,&nbsp;Asao Hirose,&nbsp;Yukihiro Kaneko,&nbsp;Masayuki Hino","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the susceptibility of 400 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) clinical isolates to 3 antipseudomonal carbapenems, namely, doripenem (DRPM), meropenem (MEPM), and imipenem (IPM). The test strains were isolated from the following specimens: respiratory (n = 194), urinary (n = 61), digestive (n = 38), pus (n = 36), skin (n = 21), blood (n = 9), upper respiratory tract and oral cavity (n = 8), and others (n = 33) at Osaka City University Hospital from July to October 2013. Test strains were categorized as susceptible, ≤ 2 μg/mL; intermediate, 4 μg/mL; and resistant, ≥ 8 μg/mL according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria (M100-S22), updated on January 2012. To compare the antimicrobial activities of these 3 carbapenems, the susceptibility rate for each agent was analyzed. Susceptibility to DRPM, MEPM, and IPM was 78.3%, 74.3%, and 64.8%, respectively, whereas resistance was 12.5%, 22.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. The frequency of strains resistant to DRPM was significantly lower than that for MEPM (p < 0.001) and IPM (p < 0.001). To compare the activities of the 3 carbapenems against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, we plotted the numbers of strains against each minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level. The MICs of DRPM were lower than those of MEPM in 19.8% of strains, and lower than those of IPM in 41.8% of strains, and the MICs of MEPM were lower than those of IPM in 33.0% of strains. Further, we found that 7.7% of the MEPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, 23.7% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, and 9.6% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to MEPM; however, none of the MEPM-resistant strains was susceptible to IPM, and none of the DRPM-resistant strains was susceptible to MEPM or IPM. In conclusion, the in vitro activity of DRPM against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates was superior to those of MEPM and IPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":22536,"journal":{"name":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","volume":"67 4","pages":"241-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A comparison of susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates to carbapenem antibiotics in our hospital].\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Kakeya,&nbsp;Koichi Yamada,&nbsp;Kiyotaka Nakaie,&nbsp;Etsuko Takizawa,&nbsp;Yasuyo Okada,&nbsp;Akiko Fujita,&nbsp;Yasutaka Nakamura,&nbsp;Junko Abe,&nbsp;Asao Hirose,&nbsp;Yukihiro Kaneko,&nbsp;Masayuki Hino\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the susceptibility of 400 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) clinical isolates to 3 antipseudomonal carbapenems, namely, doripenem (DRPM), meropenem (MEPM), and imipenem (IPM). The test strains were isolated from the following specimens: respiratory (n = 194), urinary (n = 61), digestive (n = 38), pus (n = 36), skin (n = 21), blood (n = 9), upper respiratory tract and oral cavity (n = 8), and others (n = 33) at Osaka City University Hospital from July to October 2013. Test strains were categorized as susceptible, ≤ 2 μg/mL; intermediate, 4 μg/mL; and resistant, ≥ 8 μg/mL according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria (M100-S22), updated on January 2012. To compare the antimicrobial activities of these 3 carbapenems, the susceptibility rate for each agent was analyzed. Susceptibility to DRPM, MEPM, and IPM was 78.3%, 74.3%, and 64.8%, respectively, whereas resistance was 12.5%, 22.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. The frequency of strains resistant to DRPM was significantly lower than that for MEPM (p < 0.001) and IPM (p < 0.001). To compare the activities of the 3 carbapenems against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, we plotted the numbers of strains against each minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level. The MICs of DRPM were lower than those of MEPM in 19.8% of strains, and lower than those of IPM in 41.8% of strains, and the MICs of MEPM were lower than those of IPM in 33.0% of strains. Further, we found that 7.7% of the MEPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, 23.7% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, and 9.6% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to MEPM; however, none of the MEPM-resistant strains was susceptible to IPM, and none of the DRPM-resistant strains was susceptible to MEPM or IPM. In conclusion, the in vitro activity of DRPM against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates was superior to those of MEPM and IPM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Japanese journal of antibiotics\",\"volume\":\"67 4\",\"pages\":\"241-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Japanese journal of antibiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Japanese journal of antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了400株铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)临床分离株对多利培南(DRPM)、美罗培南(MEPM)和亚胺培南(IPM) 3种抗假单胞菌碳青霉烯类药物的敏感性。试验菌株分离自2013年7 - 10月大阪市立大学医院呼吸道(194例)、尿液(61例)、消化道(38例)、脓液(36例)、皮肤(21例)、血液(9例)、上呼吸道和口腔(8例)及其他标本(33例)。试验菌株为敏感,≤2 μg/mL;中间体,4 μg/mL;耐药,≥8 μg/mL(根据2012年1月更新的临床和实验室标准协会标准(M100-S22))。为了比较这3种碳青霉烯类药物的抑菌活性,分析了每种药物的药敏率。对DRPM、MEPM和IPM的易感率分别为78.3%、74.3%和64.8%,耐药率分别为12.5%、22.8%和28.5%。DRPM耐药菌株频次显著低于MEPM (p < 0.001)和IPM (p < 0.001)。为了比较3种碳青霉烯类对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的活性,我们绘制了每种最低抑制浓度(MIC)水平下的菌株数量。DRPM的mic值低于MEPM的有19.8%,低于IPM的有41.8%,MEPM的mic值低于IPM的有33.0%。结果表明,MEPM耐药菌株对DRPM敏感的比例为7.7%,ipm耐药菌株对DRPM敏感的比例为23.7%,ipm耐药菌株对MEPM敏感的比例为9.6%;而MEPM耐药菌株对IPM均不敏感,drpm耐药菌株对MEPM和IPM均不敏感。综上所述,DRPM对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的体外活性优于MEPM和IPM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[A comparison of susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates to carbapenem antibiotics in our hospital].

We investigated the susceptibility of 400 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) clinical isolates to 3 antipseudomonal carbapenems, namely, doripenem (DRPM), meropenem (MEPM), and imipenem (IPM). The test strains were isolated from the following specimens: respiratory (n = 194), urinary (n = 61), digestive (n = 38), pus (n = 36), skin (n = 21), blood (n = 9), upper respiratory tract and oral cavity (n = 8), and others (n = 33) at Osaka City University Hospital from July to October 2013. Test strains were categorized as susceptible, ≤ 2 μg/mL; intermediate, 4 μg/mL; and resistant, ≥ 8 μg/mL according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria (M100-S22), updated on January 2012. To compare the antimicrobial activities of these 3 carbapenems, the susceptibility rate for each agent was analyzed. Susceptibility to DRPM, MEPM, and IPM was 78.3%, 74.3%, and 64.8%, respectively, whereas resistance was 12.5%, 22.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. The frequency of strains resistant to DRPM was significantly lower than that for MEPM (p < 0.001) and IPM (p < 0.001). To compare the activities of the 3 carbapenems against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, we plotted the numbers of strains against each minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) level. The MICs of DRPM were lower than those of MEPM in 19.8% of strains, and lower than those of IPM in 41.8% of strains, and the MICs of MEPM were lower than those of IPM in 33.0% of strains. Further, we found that 7.7% of the MEPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, 23.7% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to DRPM, and 9.6% of the IPM-resistant strains were susceptible to MEPM; however, none of the MEPM-resistant strains was susceptible to IPM, and none of the DRPM-resistant strains was susceptible to MEPM or IPM. In conclusion, the in vitro activity of DRPM against the P. aeruginosa clinical isolates was superior to those of MEPM and IPM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信