量化婴儿对词-物配对的触觉和视觉反应之间的关系。

Kristi Hendrickson, Margaret Friend
{"title":"量化婴儿对词-物配对的触觉和视觉反应之间的关系。","authors":"Kristi Hendrickson,&nbsp;Margaret Friend","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of visual and haptic measures as proxies for underlying cognitive abilities has a rich history in infant development research, and perhaps none more so than studies of early vocabulary comprehension. Although visual and haptic measures have displayed long-term predictive value, it remains unclear whether visual attention and haptic responses are analogous and substitutable measures of lexical knowledge. The goal of the current study was to assess the bidirectional relationship between vision and action, and to evaluate the underlying word representations that guide infants' visual and haptic responses. Two measures of visual attention, one macro-level (look accuracy) and one micro-level (proportion of gaze shifts), were measured concurrently with haptic performance during an intermodal word comprehension task. During the task, infants were presented with two images simultaneously on a touchscreen and asked to touch one of the images. Results revealed a somewhat discrepant view on how visual attention relates to haptic performance. Specifically, during trials where an incorrect haptic response was performed, looking-time was significantly greater to the incorrect visual referent, however infants displayed a more sophisticated visual attention style (greater proportion of gaze shifts) known to predict later intellectual functioning. Conversely, during trials where infants failed to perform a haptic response, looking-time to the target was significantly greater than chance however, infants performed significantly fewer gaze shifts. These results will help bridge the gap between literatures that use different response modalities and provide insight on the nature of children's developing knowledge about words.</p>","PeriodicalId":74511,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development","volume":"37 Suppl","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213854/pdf/nihms595475.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Relationship Between Infants' Haptic and Visual Response to Word-Object Pairings.\",\"authors\":\"Kristi Hendrickson,&nbsp;Margaret Friend\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of visual and haptic measures as proxies for underlying cognitive abilities has a rich history in infant development research, and perhaps none more so than studies of early vocabulary comprehension. Although visual and haptic measures have displayed long-term predictive value, it remains unclear whether visual attention and haptic responses are analogous and substitutable measures of lexical knowledge. The goal of the current study was to assess the bidirectional relationship between vision and action, and to evaluate the underlying word representations that guide infants' visual and haptic responses. Two measures of visual attention, one macro-level (look accuracy) and one micro-level (proportion of gaze shifts), were measured concurrently with haptic performance during an intermodal word comprehension task. During the task, infants were presented with two images simultaneously on a touchscreen and asked to touch one of the images. Results revealed a somewhat discrepant view on how visual attention relates to haptic performance. Specifically, during trials where an incorrect haptic response was performed, looking-time was significantly greater to the incorrect visual referent, however infants displayed a more sophisticated visual attention style (greater proportion of gaze shifts) known to predict later intellectual functioning. Conversely, during trials where infants failed to perform a haptic response, looking-time to the target was significantly greater than chance however, infants performed significantly fewer gaze shifts. These results will help bridge the gap between literatures that use different response modalities and provide insight on the nature of children's developing knowledge about words.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development\",\"volume\":\"37 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213854/pdf/nihms595475.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Boston University Conference on Language Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用视觉和触觉测量作为潜在认知能力的代理在婴儿发展研究中有着丰富的历史,也许没有比早期词汇理解的研究更重要。虽然视觉和触觉测量显示出长期的预测价值,但视觉注意和触觉反应是否是词汇知识的类似和可替代的测量方法尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估视觉和动作之间的双向关系,并评估指导婴儿视觉和触觉反应的潜在词语表征。在一个多模式文字理解任务中,我们同时测量了两种视觉注意力,一种是宏观水平(看的准确性),一种是微观水平(凝视移动的比例)。在这项任务中,婴儿们同时在触摸屏上看到两幅图像,并被要求触摸其中一幅图像。结果揭示了视觉注意与触觉表现之间的关系。具体来说,在进行不正确的触觉反应的试验中,对不正确的视觉参照物的注视时间显著增加,然而,婴儿表现出更复杂的视觉注意风格(更大比例的凝视转移),这可以预测后来的智力功能。相反,在婴儿没有做出触觉反应的实验中,婴儿对目标的注视时间明显大于偶然,然而,婴儿的注视转移明显更少。这些结果将有助于弥合使用不同反应方式的文献之间的差距,并为儿童发展单词知识的本质提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the Relationship Between Infants' Haptic and Visual Response to Word-Object Pairings.

The use of visual and haptic measures as proxies for underlying cognitive abilities has a rich history in infant development research, and perhaps none more so than studies of early vocabulary comprehension. Although visual and haptic measures have displayed long-term predictive value, it remains unclear whether visual attention and haptic responses are analogous and substitutable measures of lexical knowledge. The goal of the current study was to assess the bidirectional relationship between vision and action, and to evaluate the underlying word representations that guide infants' visual and haptic responses. Two measures of visual attention, one macro-level (look accuracy) and one micro-level (proportion of gaze shifts), were measured concurrently with haptic performance during an intermodal word comprehension task. During the task, infants were presented with two images simultaneously on a touchscreen and asked to touch one of the images. Results revealed a somewhat discrepant view on how visual attention relates to haptic performance. Specifically, during trials where an incorrect haptic response was performed, looking-time was significantly greater to the incorrect visual referent, however infants displayed a more sophisticated visual attention style (greater proportion of gaze shifts) known to predict later intellectual functioning. Conversely, during trials where infants failed to perform a haptic response, looking-time to the target was significantly greater than chance however, infants performed significantly fewer gaze shifts. These results will help bridge the gap between literatures that use different response modalities and provide insight on the nature of children's developing knowledge about words.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信