在轻度缺氧环境下,Protan对红灯的反应时间。

Jeffery K Hovis, Nelda J Milburn, Thomas E Nesthus
{"title":"在轻度缺氧环境下,Protan对红灯的反应时间。","authors":"Jeffery K Hovis,&nbsp;Nelda J Milburn,&nbsp;Thomas E Nesthus","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to determine whether protans have slower reaction times to red lights than individuals with normal color vision and to identify whether protan reaction times increase differentially in a mildly hypoxic environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Simple reaction times (SRT) to a red light-emitting diode (LED) display were measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at ground (1293 ft/394 m), simulated 12,400-ft (3780-m) altitude, and 20 min after returning to ground. Subjects were 13 individuals with normal color vision (NCV), 12 with a deutan color vision defect, and 4 with a protan color vision defect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reaction times increased by 8% with altitude and decreased after returning to ground for all groups. However, the reaction times of the protans were often faster than the NCV mean and never below the NCV 10(th) percentile. The only significant difference between color vision groups was the slowest mean reaction time of the NCV group was slower than both the pooled dichromats and pooled anomalous trichromats across all conditions by 23%. The number of lapses did not vary with altitude, but the dichromatic subjects had significantly fewer lapses than the trichromatic subjects across all conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although protans may be slower to respond to some red warning lights, this decrement in performance could not be demonstrated under the conditions of our experiment. Furthermore, the protan group's simple reaction times were not differentially affected by mild hypoxia. These results suggest that the red LEDs were sufficiently bright for these protan observers.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protan response times to red lights in a mildly hypoxic environment.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffery K Hovis,&nbsp;Nelda J Milburn,&nbsp;Thomas E Nesthus\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to determine whether protans have slower reaction times to red lights than individuals with normal color vision and to identify whether protan reaction times increase differentially in a mildly hypoxic environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Simple reaction times (SRT) to a red light-emitting diode (LED) display were measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at ground (1293 ft/394 m), simulated 12,400-ft (3780-m) altitude, and 20 min after returning to ground. Subjects were 13 individuals with normal color vision (NCV), 12 with a deutan color vision defect, and 4 with a protan color vision defect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean reaction times increased by 8% with altitude and decreased after returning to ground for all groups. However, the reaction times of the protans were often faster than the NCV mean and never below the NCV 10(th) percentile. The only significant difference between color vision groups was the slowest mean reaction time of the NCV group was slower than both the pooled dichromats and pooled anomalous trichromats across all conditions by 23%. The number of lapses did not vary with altitude, but the dichromatic subjects had significantly fewer lapses than the trichromatic subjects across all conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although protans may be slower to respond to some red warning lights, this decrement in performance could not be demonstrated under the conditions of our experiment. Furthermore, the protan group's simple reaction times were not differentially affected by mild hypoxia. These results suggest that the red LEDs were sufficiently bright for these protan observers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定蛋白对红灯的反应时间是否比色觉正常的个体慢,并确定在轻度缺氧环境下蛋白的反应时间是否有差异。方法:采用精神运动警戒任务(PVT)在地面(1293英尺/394米)、模拟海拔12400英尺(3780米)和返回地面后20分钟测量对红色发光二极管(LED)显示器的简单反应时间(SRT)。正常色觉(NCV)者13例,多肽色觉缺陷者12例,蛋白色觉缺陷者4例。结果:各组平均反应时间随海拔升高而增加8%,随返回地面而减少。然而,蛋白的反应时间通常比NCV平均值快,并且从未低于NCV的第10(th)个百分位数。色觉组之间的唯一显著差异是,在所有条件下,NCV组的最慢平均反应时间比混合二色者和混合异常三色者慢23%。失误次数不随海拔而变化,但在所有条件下,二色受试者的失误明显少于三色受试者。结论:虽然蛋白质对某些红色警示灯的反应可能会变慢,但在我们的实验条件下无法证明这种性能下降。此外,蛋白组的简单反应时间没有受到轻度缺氧的差异影响。这些结果表明,对于这些质子观察者来说,红色led足够亮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protan response times to red lights in a mildly hypoxic environment.

Purpose: This study was conducted to determine whether protans have slower reaction times to red lights than individuals with normal color vision and to identify whether protan reaction times increase differentially in a mildly hypoxic environment.

Methods: Simple reaction times (SRT) to a red light-emitting diode (LED) display were measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at ground (1293 ft/394 m), simulated 12,400-ft (3780-m) altitude, and 20 min after returning to ground. Subjects were 13 individuals with normal color vision (NCV), 12 with a deutan color vision defect, and 4 with a protan color vision defect.

Results: The mean reaction times increased by 8% with altitude and decreased after returning to ground for all groups. However, the reaction times of the protans were often faster than the NCV mean and never below the NCV 10(th) percentile. The only significant difference between color vision groups was the slowest mean reaction time of the NCV group was slower than both the pooled dichromats and pooled anomalous trichromats across all conditions by 23%. The number of lapses did not vary with altitude, but the dichromatic subjects had significantly fewer lapses than the trichromatic subjects across all conditions.

Conclusion: Although protans may be slower to respond to some red warning lights, this decrement in performance could not be demonstrated under the conditions of our experiment. Furthermore, the protan group's simple reaction times were not differentially affected by mild hypoxia. These results suggest that the red LEDs were sufficiently bright for these protan observers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信